Proceduralisation of decision-making processes: a case study of child welfare practice

References

• Almklov, P. G., G. Ulset, and J. Røyrvik. 2017. “Standardisering Og Måling I Barnevernet [Standardisation and Measurement in Child Welfare.” In Trangen Til Å Telle: Objektivering, Måling Og Standardisering Som Samfunnspraksis [The Need to Count: Objectification, Measurement and Standardisation as a Societal Practice], edited by T. Larsen and E. Røyrvik, 153–183. Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelink, C., T. A. Van Yperen, and I. J. Ten Berge. 2015. “Deciding on Child Maltreatment: A Literature Review on Methods that Improve decision-making.” Child Abuse & Neglect 49: 142–153. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., R. Osmo, and N. Gold. 2003. “Rationales Provided for Risk Assessments and for Recommended Interventions in Child Protection: A Comparison between Canadian and Israeli Professionals.” British Journal of Social Work 33 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.2.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, A., and T. Lundström. 2011. “Guided or Independent? Social Workers, Central Bureaucracy and evidence-based Practice.” European Journal of Social Work 14 (3): 323–337. doi:10.1080/13691451003744325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren, M., and K. Sahlin. 2017. “Quests for Transparency: Signs of a New Institutional Era in the Health Care Field.” In Transcending New Public Management, edited by P. Lægreid and T. Christensen, 167–190. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., C. Hall, D. Wastell, S. White, and A. Pithouse. 2010. “Risk, Instrumentalism and the Humane Project in Social Work: Identifying the Informal Logics of Risk Management in Children’s Statutory Services.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1046–1064. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2008. “Accountability in street-level Organizations.” International Journal of Public Administration 31 (3): 317–336. doi:10.1080/01900690701590587.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., and B. Jacobsson. 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, K., and N. Brunsson. 2015. Beslutninger [Decisions]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., L. Bradt, and R. Roose. 2018. “Creating Transparency through Electronic Information Systems: Opportunities and Pitfalls.” The British Journal of Social Work 48 (3): 734–750. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., and P. Gillingham. 2020. “Transparency in Social Work: A Critical Exploration and Reflection.” The British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaa166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluke, J. D., M. López López, R. Benbenishty, E. J. Knorth, and D. J. Baumann. 2020. “Advancing the Field of decision-making and Judgment in Child Welfare and Protection: A Look Back and Forward.” In Decision-making and Judgment in Child Welfare and Protection. Theory, Research, and Practice, edited by J. D. Fluke, M. L. López, R. Benbenishty, E. J. Knorth, and D. J. Baumann, 301–317. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. D. 2005. “Decision Making in Child Welfare: Errors and Their Context.” Children and Youth Services Review 27 (4): 347–352. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., P. Harnett, K. Healy, D. Lynch, and M. Tower. 2017. “Decision Making in Child and Family Welfare: The Role of Tools and Practice Frameworks.” Children Australia 42 (1): 49–56. doi:10.1017/cha.2016.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2019. “Can Predictive Algorithms Assist decision-making in Social Work with Children and Families?” Child Abuse Review 28 (2): 114–126. doi:10.1002/car.2547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. 1996. Human Judgement and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havnen, K., S. Fossum, C. Lauritzen, and S. A. Vis. 2021. “How Does the Kvello Assessment Framework Attend to Important Dimensions of the Children’s Needs and Welfare? A Comparison with the BBIC and the ICS Frameworks for Child Welfare Investigations.” Nordic Social Work Research 1–13. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2021.1891959.
   Google Scholar
• Kjær, A.-K. B. 2019. “Risikovurderinger I Barnevernet – Hva Innebærer Det Og Når Trengs Det? [Risk Assessments in Child Welfare - What Do They Mean and When are They Needed?].” Tidsskrift for familierett, arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmål 17 (2): 131–149. doi:10.18261/.0809-9553-2019-02-0.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2019. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Krutzinna, J., and M. Skivenes. 2021. “Judging Parental Competence: A cross-country Analysis of Judicial Decision Makers’ Written Assessment of Mothers’ Parenting Capacities in Newborn Removal Cases.” Child & Family Social Work 26 (1): 50–60. doi:10.1111/cfs.12788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvello, Ø. 2015. Barn I Risiko: Skadelige Omsorgssituasjoner [Children at Risk: Harmful Care Situations]. 2nd ed. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MCF 2020. Informasjonsskriv om behandlingen av barnevernssaker - nye avgjørelser fra Høyesterett [Information letter on the processing of child welfare cases: new decisions by the Supreme Court], Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Children and Families. file:///N:/Artikler/informasjonsskriv-om-barnevernssaker—nye-retningslinjer-fra-hoyesteretts-om-saksbehandling_BLD_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A. 2016. Discretion in the Welfare State: Social Rights and Professional Judgment. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2011. The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report, a child-centered System. Vol. 8062. London, UK: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., and J. Hardie. 2018. “Why We Should Stop Talking about Objectivity and Subjectivity in Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 49 (2): 411–427. doi:10.1093/social/bcy054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, A. M. 2021. “Deliberation and Deliberative Organizational Routines in Frontline decision-making.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (3): 471–488. doi:10.1093/jopart/muaa060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2015. Public Management: Performance, Professionalism and Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M., and A. Sen. 2009. [1966] The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponnert, L., and K. Svensson. 2016. “Standardisation—the End of Professional Discretion?” European Journal of Social Work 19 (3–4): 586–599. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1074551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., M. Bell, I. Sinclair, P. Sloper, W. Mitchell, P. Dyson, J. Clayden, and J. Rafferty. 2009. “An Exemplary Scheme? An Evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System.” The British Journal of Social Work 39 (4): 613–626. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., and L. Oscarsson. 2020. “Applying Standardisation Tools in Social Work Practice from the Perspectives of Social Workers, Managers, and Politicians: A Swedish Case Study.” European Journal of Social Work 23 (2): 265–276. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1540409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletten, M. S., and C. Bjørkquist. 2020. “Professionals’ Tinkering with Standardised Tools: Dynamics Involving Actors and Tools in Child Welfare Practices.” European Journal of Social Work 1–12. doi:10.1080/13691457.2020.1793114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletten, M. S., and I. T. Ellingsen. 2020. “When Standardization Becomes the Lens of Professional Practice in Child Welfare Services.” Child & Family Social Work 25 (3): 714–722. doi:10.1111/cfs.12748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 2016. The Ethnographic Interview. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. 2013. “‘Our Tariff Will Rise’: Risk, Probabilities and Child Protection.” Health, Risk & Society 15 (1): 67–83. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.753416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. M. 2018. “A Comparative Study of the Use of Different risk-assessment Models in Danish Municipalities.” British Journal of Social Work 48 (1): 195–214. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoburn, J. 2010. “Achieving Safety, Stability and Belonging for Children in out-of-home Care: The Search for ‘What Works’ across National Boundaries.” International Journal of Child and Family Welfare 13 (1): 34–49. Retrieved from: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055407863&origin=inward
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. The Gold Standard. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and S. Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but Not A Standard World: Toward A Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., C. Lauritzen, and S. Fossum. 2019. “Systematic Approaches to Assessment in Child Protection Investigations: A Literature Review.” International Social Work 0020872819828333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819828333
   Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., Ø. Christiansen, K. J. S. Havnen, C. Lauritzen, A. C. Iversen, and T. Tjelflaat. 2020. Barnevernets undersøkelsesarbeid-fra Bekymring Til Beslutning. Samlede Resultater Og Anbefalinger [The Investigative Work of the Child Welfare Service: From Concerns to Decisions. Overall Results and Recommendations]. Tromsø, Norway: UiT The Arctic University of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., J. Fook, and F. Gardner 2006. Critical reflection in health and social care, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hiof-ebooks/detail.action?docID=295530
   Google Scholar
• White, S., C. Hall, and S. Peckover. 2008. “The Descriptive Tyranny of the Common Assessment Framework: Technologies of Categorization and Professional Practice in Child Welfare.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (7): 1197–1217. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar