Saving time for activation or relationships? The legitimation and performance of automated decision-making for time efficiency in two street-level bureaucracies serving poor and unemployed clients

References

• Bernhard, I., and E. Wihlborg. 2022. “Bringing All Clients into the System–Professional Digital Discretion to Enhance Inclusion When Services are Automated.” Information Polity 27 (3): 373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. “From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer, J. 2022. Labour Market Policies: Structure and Content, Space and Time. Örebro: Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbooks in Psychology. APA Handbook of Research Methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
   Google Scholar
• Breit, E., C. Egeland, I. B. Løberg, and M. T. Røhnebæk. 2021. “Digital Coping: How Frontline Workers Cope with Digital Service Encounters.” Social Policy & Administration 55 (5): 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffat, A. 2015. “Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government.” Public Management Review 17 (1): 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. B. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy.” The American Review of Public Administration 49 (7): 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019856123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. A. 2019. Digital Discretion Acceptance and Impact in Street-Level Bureaucracy. Oslo: University of Agder.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, P. A., and H. Z. Henriksen. 2018. “Digital Discretion: A Systematic Literature Review of ICT and Street-Level Discretion.” Information Polity 23 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-170050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino, C., K. Randolph, M. Gross, D. Latham, M. Rooney, and E. Preshia. 2021. “The Subjective Experience of Information Communication Technology Use Among Child Welfare Workers.” Children & Youth Services Review 121: 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, N. 2021. “Automation and Discretion: Explaining the Effect of Automation on How Street-Level Bureaucrats Enforce.” Public Management Review 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denvall, V., K. Nordesjö, and R. Ulmestig. 2020. “Dunderhonung för socialt arbete? : En studie av MI:s användbarhet inom försörjningsstöd [article].” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 27 (3–4): 227–248. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2020.27.3-4.3663.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., R. Roose, and T. Evans. 2020. “Managing the Electronic Turn.” European Journal of Social Work 23 (5): 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1582009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslund, A., W. Pello-Esso, R. Ulmestig, U. Vikman, I. Waernbaum, A. Westerberg, and J. Zetterqvist. 2019. Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik. Vad och för vem? En beskrivning utifrån ett unikt datamaterial. Uppsala: IFAU Rapport 2019:5.
   Google Scholar
• Germundsson, N. 2022. “Promoting the Digital Future: The Construction of Digital Automation in Swedish Policy Discourse on Social Assistance.” Critical Policy Studies 16 (4): 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.2022507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender, L. 2023. “Crumbs from the Rich Man’s Table? A Study About Labour Market Policies and Recognition of Welfare Recipients in Sweden.” Dissertaion in Social Work. Växjö: Linneus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 2010. “The Attributes of Human Service Organizations.” In Human Services as Complex Organizations, edited by Y. Hasenfeld, 9–32. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B., and H. Johansson. 2007. Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States: Dynamics of Choice, Duties and Participation in a Changing Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933527.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A. 2021. “Suing the Algorithm: The Mundanization of Automated Decision-Making in Public Services Through Litigation.” INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY 25 (14): 2046–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C., and G. Marston. 2006. “Room to Move? Professional Discretion at the Frontline of Welfare‐To‐Work.” The Australian Journal of Social Issues 41 (2): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2006.tb00004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K., G. Scaramuzzino, and R. Ulmestig. 2022. “The Social Worker-Client Relationship in the Digital Era: A Configurative Literature Review.” European Journal of Social Work 25 (2): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1964445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K., R. Ulmestig, and V. Denvall. 2020. “Coping with Tensions Between Standardization and Individualization in Social Assistance.” Nordic Social Work Research 12 (4): 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1835696.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., L. R. Christensen, and T. T. Hildebrandt. 2020. “The Role of Discretion in the Age of Automation.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29 (3): 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09371-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranerup, A., and H. Z. Henriksen. 2022. “Digital Discretion: Unpacking Human and Technological Agency in Automated Decision Making in Sweden’s Social Services.” Social Science Computer Review 40 (2): 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranerup, A., and L. Svensson. 2022. “Value Positions in the Implementation of Automated Decision-Making in Social Assistance.” Nordic Social Work Research 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2022.2062040.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., J. S. Persson, and L. T. Heeager. 2015. “How E-Government Managers Prioritise Rival Value Positions: The Efficiency Imperative.” Information Polity 20 (1): 35–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150349.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, T., and R. Ulmestig. 2018. “Försörjningsstöd mellan individuella brister och samhällsproblem.” In Manifest: för ett socialt arbete i tiden, edited by M. Dahlstedt and P. Lalander, 71–84. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Scaramuzzino, G. 2019. Socialarbetare om automatisering i socialt arbete: En webbenkätundersökning. Lund: Lunds universitet.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 2001:453 Social Services Act [Socialtjänstlagen]. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/socialtjanstlag-2001453_sfs-2001-453.
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2021. Kommunal arbetsmarknadsstatistik 2021. Kolada – statistik och databank . [Municipal labor market statistics 2021. Kolada – statistics and data bank]. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Accessed through www.skr.se
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R. 2007. På gränsen till fattigvård: En studie om arbetsmarknadspolitik och socialbidrag. Lund: Lunds universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., and G. Marston. 2015. “Street‐Level Perceptions of Procedural Rights for Young Unemployed People–A Comparative Study Between Sweden and Australia.” Social Policy & Administration 49 (3): 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., and K. Nordesjö, Fronesis. Byråkrati. 2019. Roboten i försörjningsstödsbyråkratin. Malmö: Tidskriftsföreningen Fronesis.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aerschot, P. 2016. Activation Policies and the Protection of Individual Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Situation in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., D. Caswell, P. Kupka, F. Larsen, R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, and F. Larsen. 2017. Frontline Delivery of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694474.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., and P. Van der Aa. 2012. “Activation Work: Policy Programme Administration or Professional Service Provision?” Journal of Social Policy 41 (3): 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, M., and I. Brass. 2019. “Administration by Algorithm? Public Management Meets Public Sector Machine Learning.” In Algorithmic Regulation, edited by K. Yeung and M. Lodge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vikman, U., and A. Westerberg. (2017). Arbetar kommunerna på samma sätt. Om kommunal variation inom arbetsmarknadspolitiken. Rapport 2017:7. Uppsala: IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Zouridis, S., M. van Eck, and M. Bovens. 2020. “Automated discretion.” In Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom, edited by T. Evans and P. Hupe, 313–329. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_20.
   Google Scholar