Reflection on action by activation workers as professional learning strategy

References

• Altrichter, H., S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, and O. Zuber-Skerritt. 2002. “The Concept of Action Research.” The Learning Organization 9 (3): 125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470210428840.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A., and S. Natland. 2020. “The Meaning of Professionalism in Activation Work: Frontline managers’ Perspectives.” European Journal of Social Work 25 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1783212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., D. Culver, and W. Gilbert. 2016. “Using Appreciative Inquiry to Create High- Impact Coach Learning: Insights from a Decade of Applied Research.” Ai Practitioner 59–65. https://doi.org/10.12781/978-1-907549-27-4-9.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., and T. Dall. 2022. “Using Conversation Analysis to Develop Reflective Practice in Social Work.” Qualitative Social Work 21 (6): 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall, T., and S. Danneris. 2019. “Reconsidering ‘What Works’ in Welfare-To-Work with the Vulnerable Unemployed: The Potential of Relational Causality as an Alternative Approach.” Social Policy and Society, Early View 18 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenaar, T., A. Rijk, and A. Meershoek. 2016. “What’s in a Frame? How Professionals Assess Clients in D Utch Work Reintegration Practice.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (7): 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, L., L. van der Laan, and S. Baker. 2019. “Reflective Practice and Work-Based Research: A Description of Micro- and Macro-Reflective Cycles.” Reflective Practice 20 (2): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1591945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J., ed. 2022. Practicing Critical Reflection in Social Care Organisations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., and F. Gardner. 2007. Practising Critical Reflection, a Resource Handbook. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuertes, V., and C. Lindsay. 2016. “Personalisation and Street‐Level Practice in Activation: The Case of the Uk’s Work Programme.” Public Administration 94 (2): 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 1988. Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. 2007. “Thematic Coding and Categorizing. “ In Analyzing Qualitative Data, 38–56. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hagelund, A. 2016. “The Activating Profession: Coaching and Coercing in the Welfare Services.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (7): 725–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2016-0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. C., and S. Natland. 2017. “The Working Relationship Between Social Worker and Service User in an Activation Policy Context.” Nordic Social Work Research 7 (2): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1221850.
   Google Scholar
• Kampen, T., and E. Tonkens. 2018. “A Personalised Approach in Activation. Workfare volunteers’ Experiences with Activation Practitioners.” European Journal of Social Work 22 (6): 1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. 2009. “Promises and Pressures of Critical Reflection for Social Work Coping in Change.” European Journal of Social Work 12 (3): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903090771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ken, M. 2019. Postmodern Social Work : Reflective Practice and Edu Cation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. 2005. “Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality: the challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy Mellom profesjonsetikk og byråkratisk rasjonalitet: Sosialarbeideres utfordrende etiske posisjon ved iverksetting av arbeidslinjen.” European Journal of Social Work 8 (4): 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500314459.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T., S. Keville, A. Cain, and J. R. Adler. 2022. “Facilitating Reflection: A Review and Synthesis of the Factors Enabling Effective Facilitation of Reflective Practice.” Reflective Practice 23 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2064444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masselink, R., J. D. Haan, N. Hugenholtz, M. van Rossum, and R. P. Schwippert. 2020. Veranderen met appreciative inquiry : waarderend actieonderzoek in de praktijk. Amsterdam: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H., and M. Monrad. 2023. “Client Participation and Conditionality: Navigating Conflicting Normative Demands in Employment Services.” Administration & Society 55 (5): 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231157750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U. 2016. “The Street-Level Delivery of Activation Policies: Constraints and Possibilities for a Practice of Citizenship.” European Journal of Social Work 19 (3–4): 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P., and D. Dierckx. 2012. “To Work or Not to Work? The Role of the Organisational Context for Social Workers’ Perceptions on Activation.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (6): 1170–1189. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. 2000. “Self and Social Work: Towards an Integrated Model of Learning.” Journal of Social Work Practice 14 (2): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530020020500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., and A. Lees. 2022. “Reflective Practice Editorial.” Journal of Social Work Practice 36 (2): 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2066904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T., and S. B. Fekjær. 2018. “Frontline workers’ Competency in Activation Work.” International Journal of Social Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12320. 28 (1) 77–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T., and L. I. Terum. 2022. “Dedication to Work: Social Workers in a Norwegian Activation Work Context.” European Journal of Social Work 26 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. 2022. “Learning from Experience – Anxiety, Defence and Leadership in Group Supervision: The Implications for Supervision and Reflective Practice.” Journal of Social Work Practice 36 (2): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2057939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solvang, I. 2017. “Discretionary Approaches to Social workers’ Personalisation of Activation Services for Long-Term Welfare Recipients.” European Journal of Social Work 20 (4): 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1188777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., and V. Borghi. 2008. “Review Article: The Governance of Activation.” Social Policy & Society 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746408004351.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., D. Caswell, P. Kupka, and F. Larsen, Eds. 2017. Frontline Delivery of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed. Oxford: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., F. Larsen, and D. Caswell. 2018. “Introduction: Frontline Delivery of Welfare‐To‐Work in Different European Contexts.” International Social Security Review 71 (4): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12186.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., J. Penning de Vries, and E. Knies. 2021. “Managing Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Performance by Promoting Professional Behavior Through HRM.” Public Personnel Management 51 (2): 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260211046554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., and P. van der Aa. 2013. “Control of Front-Line Workers in Welfare Agencies. Towards Professionalism Professionals Under Pressure: The Reconfiguration of Professional Work in Changing Public Services, edited byM. Noordegraaf and B. Steijn, 193–209. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., P. van der Aa, and N. van Gestel. 2010. “Professionals without a Profession? Redesigning Case Management in Dutch Local Welfare Agencies.” European Journal of Social Work 13 (4): 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691451003603455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R., and S. Jennings. 2022. “Creating the Conditions for Collective Curiosity and Containment: Insights from Developing and Delivering Reflective Groups with Social Work Supervisors.” Journal of Social Work Practice 36 (2): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2058922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. 2017. When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar