Professional responses to exogenous change: the social work profession and the jurisdictional domain opened up by the Norwegian welfare-to-work reform

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackroyd, S., I. Kirkpatrick, and R. M. Walker. 2007. “Public Management Reform in the UK and Its Consequences for Professional Organization: A Comparative Analysis.” Public Administration 85 (1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00631.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2007. “Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development.” The Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. 2011. ““Kommunale” oppgaver og brukere - en lukkende representasjon av sosialt arbeid i NAV-kontoret.” Fontene Forskning, no. (2/11): 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. 2015. “Reforming Social Services: The Institutional and Organizational Context of the HUSK Program [Special Issue: Enhancing the Quality of Public Social Services Through the Involvement of Service Users].” Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work 12 (1): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.954941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A., and K. Fossestøl. 2011. “Hvor går NAV-reformen? Hva blir NAV-kontorene som velferdstjeneste?” In NAV ved et veiskille. Organisasjonsendring som velferdsreform, edited by T. A. Andreassen and K. Fossestøl, 240–260. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A., S. Legard, and A. Lie. 2011. Forvaltningsenheter i NAV. Etableringsprosess og konsekvenser for oppgaveløsningen, 5. Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., and G. E. Kreiner. 1999. ““How Can You Do it?”: Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity.” Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 413–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. M., H. Heen, and S. Hovde. 2003. Kvalitetsbyråkratiet - mellom autonomi og kontroll. Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Breit, E. 2014. “Discursive Practices of Remedial Organizational Identity Work: A Study of the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (2): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit, E., T. A. Andreassen, and K. Fossestøl. 2022. “Development of Hybrid Professionalism: Street-Level managers’ Work and the Enabling Conditions of Public Reform.” Public Management Review 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2095004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit, E., K. Fossestøl, and T. A. Andreassen. 2018. “From pure to hybrid professionalism in post-NPM activation reform: The institutional work of frontline managers.” Journal of Professions and Organization 5 (1): 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit, E., K. Fossestøl, and E. Pedersen. 2018. “A Knowledge Hierarchy in Labour and Welfare Services? Evidence‐Based and Practice‐Based Knowledge in Frontline Service Innovation.” International Social Security Review 71 (4): 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodtkorb, E. 2017. Individualisering av tjenester i et aktiveringsprogram-en studie av veilederfellesskapet i kvalifiseringsprogrammet. Oslo: Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., and A. K. Innjord. 2011. “Inklusjonsorientert NAV-praksis?” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 14 (1): 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., and F. Larsen. 2017. “Frontline Work in the Delivery of Danish Activation Policies.” In Frontline Delivery of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed, edited by R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, and L. Flemming, 163–180, New York - London: Routhledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2012. “Competing Principles of Agency Organization – the Reorganization of a Reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (4): 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312455306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., A. Lockett, R. Finn, G. Martin, and J. Waring. 2012. “Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism.” Organization Studies 33 (7): 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612445116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalen, H., M. N. Ranger, and K. Rytter. 2014. Sosialt arbeid i NAV : høgskoleklinikk som bro mellom teori og praksis. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Daudigeos, T. 2013. “In Their Profession’s Service: How Staff Professionals Exert Influence in Their Organization.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (5): 722–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depraetere, J., C. Vandeviver, I. Keygnaert, and T. V. Beken. 2021. “The Critical Interpretive Synthesis: An Assessment of Reporting Practices.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24 (6): 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1799637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. “Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1020-1940.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, 267–292. Chicago - London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., D. Cavers, S. Agarwal, E. Annandale, A. Arthur, J. Harvey, R. Hsu, S. Katbamna, R. Olsen, and L. Smith. 2006. “Conducting a Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature on Access to Healthcare by Vulnerable Groups.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 6 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobbin, F. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. B., and C. Jones. 2010. “Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1): 114–149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlien, T. H. 2016. Sosialt arbeid. En begrepshistorisk undersøkelse. Bergen: University of Bergen].
   Google Scholar
• Erlien, T. H. 2017. “Nav-reformen som politisk prosjekt: Bedre enn sitt rykte, men dømt til å mislykkes?” Nytt norsk tidsskrift 34 (4): 366–378. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3053-2017-04-04.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2010. “Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy.” The British Journal of Social Work 41 (2): 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., and J. Harris. 2004. “Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (6): 871–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2002. “New Directions in State and International Professional Occupations: Discretionary Decision-Making and Acquired Regulation.” Work, Employment and Society 16 (2): 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/095001702400426875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2003. “The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Occupational Change in the Modern World.” International Sociology 18 (2): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2011. “A New Professionalism? Challenges and Opportunities.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., and P. Lægreid. 2009. “Reorganizing the Welfare State Administration.” Public Management Review 11 (3): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldheim, S., I. Levin, and E. Engebretsen. 2015. “The Theoretical Foundation of Social Case Work.” Nordic Social Work Research 5 (sup1): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2015.1067900.
   Google Scholar
• FO. 2014. Det positive navet – ei reiseskildring. Oslo: Fellesorganisasjonen.
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, B. 2019. “Ethics, Knowledge and Ambivalence in Social workers’ Professional Self-Understanding.” The British Journal of Social Work 49 (7): 1968–1986. https://doi.org/10.1093/social/bcy113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., E. Breit, T. Alm Andreassen, and L. Klemsdal. 2015. “Managing Institutional Complexity in Public Sector Reform: Hybridization in Front-Line Service Organizations.” Public Administration 93 (2): 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 1985. “The Reorganization of the Medical Profession.” Medical Care Review 42 (1): 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/107755878504200103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The Third Logic. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glemmestad, H. 2011. Sosialt arbeid i en ny tid: hvordan forstå sosialt arbeids rolle i NAV kontoret?. Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Innlandet.
   Google Scholar
• Glemmestad, H., and L. Kleppe. 2019. Arbeidsinkludering i sosialt arbeid. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. 2002. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, E., I. Harsløf, and I. Lødemel. 2014. “Norwegian Activation Reform on a Wave of Wider Welfare State Change: A Critical Assessment.” In Activation or Workfare : Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence, edited by I. Lødemel and A. Moreira, 19–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halås, C. T. 2010. “Balansekunst i NAV.” In Hvem var vi - hvem er vi - hvem blir vi : å bygge en profesjon, edited by J. Gjedrem and C. T. Halås, 137–148. Oslo: Fellesorganisasjonen.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, B., and J. Cornelissen. 2022. “Rigor with or without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Organizational Research Methods 25 (2): 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120937786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, E., E. Berg, J. Barry, and J. Chandler. 2013. “Neoliberalism, Managerialism and the Reconfiguring of Social Work in Sweden and the United Kingdom.” Organization 20 (4): 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 1999. “Social Services and Welfare-To-Work: Prospects for the Social Work Profession.” Administration in Social Work 23 (3–4): 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K. 2009. “A Case of Mistaken Identity: The Social Welfare Professions and New Public Management.” Journal of Sociology 45 (4): 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783309346476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K., and G. Meagher. 2004. “The Reprofessionalization of Social Work: Collaborative Approaches for Achieving Professional Recognition.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (2): 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrikx, W., and N. van Gestel. 2017. “The Emergence of Hybrid Professional Roles: GPs and Secondary School Teachers in a Context of Public Sector Reform.” Public Management Review 19 (8): 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1257062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. C. 1984. The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jantz, B., T. Christensen, and P. Lægreid. 2015. “Performance Management and Accountability: The Welfare Administration Reform in Norway and Germany.” International Journal of Public Administration 38 (13–14): 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1069838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen, J. T. 2015. “Public Governance-Constraints and Challenges for Social Work Practice.” Journal of Comparative Social Work 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v10i2.127. http://journal.uia.no/index.php/JCSW/article/view/344. Available at.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, A., S. Natland, and A. M. Støkken. 2011. Samarbeidsforskning i praksis: erfaringer fra HUSK-prosjektet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. 2005. “Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality: the challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy Mellom profesjonsetikk og byråkratisk rasjonalitet: Sosialarbeideres utfordrende etiske posisjon ved iverksetting av arbeidslinjen.” European Journal of Social Work 8 (4): 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500314459.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” The Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liodden, T. M. 2021. “On Guard Against Bureaucracy: Depictions of the Social Work Bureaucrat in Syllabi Texts.” Social Work Education 40 (5): 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1841154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, L., E. Granter, P. Hyde, and J. Hassard. 2013. “Still Blue‐Collar After All These Years? An Ethnography of the Professionalization of Emergency Ambulance Work.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (5): 750–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messel, J. 2013. I velferdsstatens frontlinje: barnevernspedagogers, sosionomers og vernepleieres historie. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Messel, J. 2014. “Sosialarbeiderne. I velferdsstatens frontlinje.” In Profesjonshistorier, edited by J. Messel and R. Slagstad, 526–565. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, L. 2017. “Being Seconded to a Mental Health Trust: The (In) Visibility of Mental Health Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 47 (5): 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzicant, A., and E. Peled. 2018. “Home Visits in Social Work: From Disembodiment to Embodied Presence.” The British Journal of Social Work 48 (3): 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., D. M. Brock, and R. Suddaby. 2013. “Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (5): 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., and I. Kirkpatrick. 2011. “Introduction: Professions and Organizations-A Conceptual Framework.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2011. “Risky Business: How Professionals and Professional Fields (Must) Deal with Organizational Issues.” Organization Studies 32 (10): 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611416748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., and B. Steijn. 2014. Professionals Under Pressure: The Reconfiguration of Professional Work in Changing Public Services. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U. 2016. “The Street-Level Delivery of Activation Policies: Constraints and Possibilities for a Practice of Citizenship.” European Journal of Social Work 19 (3–4): 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., and S. P. Olesen. 2017. “Activation Work as Professional Practice: Complexities and Professional Boundaries at the Street Level of Employment Policy Implementation.” In Social and Caring Professions in European Welfare States, 237–252. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Numerato, D., D. Salvatore, and G. Fattore. 2012. “The Impact of Management on Medical Professionalism: A Review.” Sociology of Health & Illness 34 (4): 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01393.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øyehaugen, M. A. 2006. “En ny og bedre tjeneste.” Fontene no.
   Google Scholar
• Rambøll. 2010. “Utredning av hvordan tilbud innenfor høyere utdanning kan bidra til å dekke langsiktig kompetansebehov i arbeids- og velferdsforvaltningen.”
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., K. Golden-Biddle, and K. Germann. 2006. “Legitimizing a New Role: Small Wins and Microprocesses of Change.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (5): 977–998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., E. Goodrick, S. B. Waldorff, and A. Casebeer. 2017. “Getting Leopards to Change Their Spots: Co-Creating a New Professional Role Identity.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (3): 1043–1070. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2009a. “Er NAV framtidens arena for sosionomene?” In Sosialt arbeid : tilbakeblikk, utfordringer, visjoner, edited by A. B. Grønningsæter, 67–78. Oslo: Fellesorganisasjonen FO.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2009b. “Ulike forståelser av helhetlig oppfølging i NAV.” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 12 (3): 192–206.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2010. “NAV-reformen: Sosialarbeidernes profesjon utfordres.” Fontene Forskning 1 (1): 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2013. “The Reform of the Welfare Services in Norway: One Office–One Way of Thinking?” European Journal of Social Work 16 (5): 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.722982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2014. “Ubehaget ved å forenkle det komplekse.” In Ubehaget i sosialt arbeid, edited by A. Ohnstad, M. Rugkåsa, and S. Ylvisaker, 141–159. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2017. “‘How’we do social work, not ‘what’we do.” Nordic Social Work Research 7 (2): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2017.1284150.
   Google Scholar
• Rytter, K. 2008. Oppfølgings- og tiltaksarbeid i NAV : med case fra sosialtjenesten i NAV Sagene. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Schafft, A., and Ø. Spjelkavik. 2006. På vei til jobb? Evaluering av arbeidsmarkedssatsingen for sosialhjelpsmottakere.Spjelkavik. Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2008. “Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents.” Organization Studies 29 (2): 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjefstad, N. 2013. “Er det rom for sosialt arbeid i Nav?” Fontene Forskning 1 (13): 76–88.
   Google Scholar
• Skjefstad, N. S., R. Kiik, and H. Sandoval. 2018. “The Role of Social Workers Under Neoliberal Ideology at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (NAV).” In Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work, 137–147. Milton: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skjefstad, N. S., and E. Marthinsen. 2007. Tiltaksarbeid i sosialtjeneste og NAV : tett på!. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Stolanowski, P. A. 2009. “Er det plass til sosialfaglig arbeid i NAV?” In Sosialt arbeid : tilbakeblikk, utfordringer, visjoner, edited by A. B. Grønningsæter, 54–66. Oslo: Fellesorganisasjonen FO.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., and T. Viale. 2011. “Professionals and Field-Level Change: Institutional Work and the Professional Project.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terum, L. I. 2014. NAV, arbeidslinja og sosialarbeiderutdanningene. Oslo: Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.
   Google Scholar
• Terum, L. I., and J. T. Jessen. 2015. “Den tvetydige aktiveringen: en studie av veiledere ved lokale NAV-kontor.” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 18 (2): 96–109.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2011. “Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (3): 555–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311407364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, and B. Steijn. 2009. “Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: Application in a New Public Management Context.” Public Management Review 11 (5): 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R. 2017. “State of the Art in Frontline Studies of Welfare-To-Work.” In Frontline Delivery of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed, edited by R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, and F. Larsen, 12–35. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., and P. van der Aa. 2012. “Activation Work: Policy Programme Administration or Professional Service Provision?” Journal of Social Policy 41 (3): 493–510. 10.1017/S0047279412000062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. 2016. “Professional Identity and Social Work.” In The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism, edited by M. Dent, I. L. Bourgeault, J.-L. Denis, and E. Kuhlmann, 355–370. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar