Key success factors of collaborative planning processes

References

• AIA (2009) Experiences in Collaboration: On the Path to IPD, American Institute of Architects California Council, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• van Aken, J. (2003) On the Design of Design Process in Architecture and Engineering: Technological Rules and the Principle of Minimal Specification, Working Paper, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Alshuwaikhat, H.M. and Abubakar, I. (2008) An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1777–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anumba, C.J., Baugh, C. and Khalfan, M.M.A. (2002) Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5), 260–270. doi: 10.1108/02635570210428294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T., Jr. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J.N. (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, G. and Kadefors, A. (2012) Collaboration in public construction—contractual incentives, partnering schemes and trust. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(4), 240–250. doi: 10.1080/21573727.2012.684876
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J.E., Hogan, R. and Salas, E. (1987) Personality and group performance, in Hendrick, C. (ed.) Group Process and Intergroup Relations, Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Faniran, O.O., Love, P.E.D., Treloar, G. and Anumba, C.J. (2001) Methodological issues in design-construction integration. Logistics Information Management, 14(5/6), 421–428. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006254
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. and Bresnen, M. (2011) The emergence of partnering in construction practice: an activity theory perspective. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(1), 41–52. doi: 10.1080/21573727.2010.549609
   Google Scholar
• Heiselberg, P., Brohus, H., Hesselholt, A., Rasmussen, H., Seinre, E. and Thomas, S. (2009) Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings. Renewable Energy, 34(9), 2030–2036. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, W. and Liu, B. (2000) Conceptual design: issues and challenges. Computer-Aided Design, 32(14), 849–850.
   Google Scholar
• IWHBD (2008) Integrated Whole Building Design Guidelines, New Zealand Government, Ministry for the Environment, available at www.mfe.govt.nz (accessed 26 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jassawalla, A.R. and Sashittal, H.C. (1998) An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00080-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfan, M.M.A., Anumba, C.J., Siemieniuch, C.E. and Sinclair, M.A. (2001) Readiness assessment of the construction supply chain for concurrent engineering. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2), 141–153. doi: 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00023-X
   Google Scholar
• Kichuk, S.L. and Wiesner, W.H. (1997) The Big Five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(3–4), 195–221. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacic, I. and Müller, C. (2011) Collaborative planning practice for sustainable buildings—a case study research, in People, Buildings and Environment, Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2, Lednice, Czech Republic, 7–9 November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacic, I. and Sreckovic, M. (2012) Designing the planning processes for sustainable buildings: from experiment towards implementation. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 3(1), 51–63. doi: 10.1080/21573727.2012.760155
   Google Scholar
• Kovacic, I., Filzmoser, M., Faatz, S. and Koeszegi, S.T. (2011) Costs and benefits of integrated planning: first experiment results. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 3(1), 254–263.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P. (2012) Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Mistry, D. and Davis, P.R. (2010) Price competitive alliance projects: identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 947–956. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nofera, W. and Korkmaz, S. (2010) Design process integration for sustainable, high performance buildings, in Working Paper Proceedings Engineering Project Organizations Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 4–7 November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pennell, J.P. and Winner, R.I. (1989) Concurrent engineering: practices and prospects, in Global Telecommunications Conference, 1989, and Exhibition. Communications Technology for the 1990s and Beyond, GLOBECOM '89, IEEE, Vol. 1, pp. 647–655.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, M. and Owen, R. (2010) Integrated design and delivery solutions. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(4), 227–231. doi: 10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS0
   Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H. (2001) Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: a socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(1), 137–150. doi: 10.1080/09537320120040491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell-Smith, S.V., Lepech, M.D., Fruchter, R. and Meyer, Y.B. (2014) Sustainable target value design: integrating life cycle assessment and target value design to improve building energy and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.025
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.P. and Eppinger, S.D. (1998) Deciding between sequential and concurrent tasks in engineering design. CE (Concurrent Engineering): Research and Application, 6(1), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturts Dossick, C. and Neff, G. (2011) Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using building information modelling. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(2), 83–93. doi: 10.1080/21573727.2011.569929
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J. and Pardasani, A. (2002) Collaborative conceptual design—state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34(13), 981–996. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00157-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar