Increasing the Effective Span of Control: Advanced Graphics for Proactive, Trend-Based Monitoring

REFERENCES

• Andre, A. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). When users want what's NOT best for them. Ergonomics in Design, 3, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. W. (1993). Performance vs. preference (pp. 282–286). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. B., & Fritz, H. I. (2005).Objects and mappings: Incompatible principles of display design—a critique of Marino and Mahan. Human Factors, 47, 131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. B., Payne, M., Calcaterra, J., & Nittoli, B. (2000). An empirical comparison of alternative methodologies for the evaluation of configural displays. Human Factors, 42, 287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. B., Payne, M., & Walters, B. (2005). An evaluation of a “time tunnel” display format for the presentation of temporal information. Human Factors, 47, 342–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. B., & Zimmerman, J. (2001). A preliminary investigation of the time tunnels display design technique. Displays, 22, 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braseth, A. O., Nurmilaukas, V., & Laarni, J. (2009). Realizing the information rich design for the Loviisa nuclear power plant. American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies. Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, S. (1983). Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. M. (2006). Towards proactive monitoring in the petrochemical industry. Safety Science, 44, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. M., Skraaning Jr. G., Jamieson, G. A., Lau, N., Kwok, J., Welch, R., & Andresen, G. (2008). Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: Situation awareness effects. Human Factors, 50, 663–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1985). Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science, 229, 828–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, E., & Bullemer, P. (1996). Abnormal situation management: not by new technology alone. American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICHE) Conference on Plant Safety, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Coekin, J. A. (1969). A versatile presentation of parameters for rapid recognition of total state (58-MMS 4; conference record 69). International Symposium on Man-Machine Systems. New York: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. B., & Smallman, H. S. (2013). Human-centered command and control of future autonomous systems. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington, J., Reising, D., & Burns, C. (2009). Effective alarm management practices. Minneapolis, MN: Abnormal Situation Management Consortium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guerlain, S., Jamieson, G. A., Bullemer, P., & Blair, R. (2002). The MPC elucidator: A case study in the design for human-automation interaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 32, 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajdukiewicz, J., & Wu, P. (2004). Beyond trends: A framework for mapping time-based requirements and display formats for process operations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting September 2004, 48, 1885–1889.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. P. (1995). An experimental investigation of configural, digital, and temporal information on process displays. Human Factors, 37, 539–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., & Stull, A. T. (2012). Choosing and using geospatial displays: Effects of design on performance and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L., & Weitzman, L. (1984). STEAMER: An interactive inspectable simulation-based training system. AI Magazine, 5, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, B. (2012). The high performance HMI: process graphics to maximize operator effectiveness. InTech, Nov/Dec. http://www.isa.org/intech/20121204.
   Google Scholar
• International Society of Automation (ISA). (2010). Human machine interfaces for process automation systems. Research Triangle Park, NC: International Society of Automation (ISA).
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, S. (1971). Test for colour-blindness. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G. A., & Vicente, K. J. (2001). Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: Supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25, 1055–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessa, M., & Burns, C. M. (2007). Visual sensitivities to dynamic graphical displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 206–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, N., Jamieson, G. A., Skraaning Jr. G., & Burns, C. M. (2008). Ecological interface design in the nuclear domain: An empirical evaluation of ecological displays for the secondary subsystems of a boiling water reactor plant simulator. IEEE Transactions Nuclear Science, 55, 3597–3610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge, G. E., Gu, Y., & Luebker, A. (1989). Efficiency of graphical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 365–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1997). Human factors in process control. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics ( 2nd ed.; pp. 1944–1971). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mumaw, R. J., Roth, E. M., Vicente, K. J., & Burns, C. M. (2000). There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plan than meets the eye. Human Factors, 42, 36–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo, I. (1995). Adequately address abnormal situation management. Chemical Engineering Progress, 91, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. A. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, W. S., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). Inducing effective operator control through ecological interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 653–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32(1), 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human–machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Reising, D. V. C., & Bullemer, P. T. (2008). A direct perception, span-of-control overview display to support a process control operator's situation awareness: A practice-oriented design process (pp. 267–271). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Rensink, R., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, E., & Mason, J. F. (1979). The accident that shouldn't have happened: An analysis of Three Mile Island. IEE Spectrum, 16, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schons, V. W., & Wickens, C.D. (1993). Visual separation and information access in aircraft display layout (Report No. ARL-93-7/NASA-AI-93-1). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (2006). Supervisory control. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics ( 3rd ed.; pp. 1025–1052). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & Cook, M. B. (2011). Naïve realism: Folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 579–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & Cook, M. B. (2013). Proactive supervisory decision support from trend-based monitoring of autonomous and automated systems: A tale of two domains (pp. 320–329). In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Systems and Applications. Proceedings of Human Computer International (HCII) 2013, Part II, LNCS 8022. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. S. (2003). CHEX (change history explicit): New HCI concepts for change awareness (pp. 528–532). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting. Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. S. (2005). NaïverRealism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Spenkelink, G. P. J. (1990). Aiding the operator's anticipatory behaviour: The design of process state information. Applied Ergonomics, 21, 199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. John, M., & Smallman, H. S. (2008). Staying up to speed: Four design principles for maintaining and recovering situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 118–139.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, M., Smallman, H. S., Manes, D. I., Feher, B. A., & Morrison, J. G. (2005a). Heuristic automation for decluttering tactical displays. Human Factors, 47, 509–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. John, M. F., Smallman, H. S., & Manes, D. I. (2005b). Recovery from interruptions to a dynamic monitoring task: The beguiling utility of instant replay (pp. 473–477). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J., Mumaw, R. J., & Roth, E. M. (2004). Operator monitoring in complex dynamic work environment: A qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5(5), 359–384.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-22, 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. (2008). Applied attention theory. Boca-Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O’Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 34–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D., Wise, J., & Hanes, L. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems (pp. 110–114). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 25th Annual Meeting. Rochester, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D. (1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371–2393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D., & Roth, E. M. (1988). Cognitive systems engineering (pp. 1–41). In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human–computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar