Sustainable Work Systems: A Challenge for Macroergonomics?

REFERENCES

• Alter, S. (2009). Service system fundamentals: Work system, value chain, and life cycle. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 223–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9490-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Occupational Health and Environment. (2005). Participatory action oriented training programme. Can Tho City, Vietnam: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Clothes Campaign. (2005). Looking for a quick fix. How weak social auditing is keeping workers in sweatshops. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A..B. (Rami). (2002). What the world needs now is sustainable work systems. In P. Docherty, M. Kira, & A.B..(Rami) Shani (Eds.), Creating sustainable work systems: Emerging perspectives and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A..B. (Rami). (2009). Creating sustainable work Systems: Developing social sustainability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzone, P., Marras, W..S., Wilson, J..R., & van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 5(4), 377–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and Environment, 11, 130–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (Eds.). (2014). Sustainability and human resource management. Developing sustainable business organizations. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eijnatten, F. M. V. (2000). From intensive to sustainable work systems: The quest for a new paradigm of work. In M. Sapir (Ed.), Working without limits? Re-organizing work and reconsidering workers' health (pp. 47–66). Brussels, Belgium: TUTB-SALTSA.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM(2011) 681 final. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., & Zink, K. J. (2012). Defining elements of sustainable work systems—A system-oriented approach. A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41(1): 3900–3905.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., Hobelsberger, C., & Zink, K. J. (2009). Human factors and sustainable development in global value creation. In: International Ergonomics Association (Ed.), 17th World Congress on Ergonomics of the IEA 2009. Bejing, China: IEA Press (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The State ofthe Art. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gesellschaft fuer Arbeitswissenschaft. (1999). Selbstverstaendnis der Gesellschaft fuer Arbeitswissenschaft e.V [Mission of the German Ergonomics and Human Factors Society]. Dortmund, Germany: GfA-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P..A., & Drury, C..G. (2011). Does human factors/ergonomics contribute to the quality of life? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 12(5), 416–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087
   Google Scholar
• Hauff, M. V. (2014). Nachhaltige Entwicklung—Grundlagen und Umsetzung [Sustainable development—Principles and implementation]. Oldenburg, Germany: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, H. W., & Kleiner, B..M. (2002). Macroergonomics: Theory, methods, and application. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hiß, S. (2006). Warum uebernehmen Unternehmen gesellschaftliche Verantwortung? [Why do companies take on social responsibility?] Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. (2004). Behind the brand names. Working conditions and labour rights in export processing zones. Retrieved from http://www.newunionism.net/library/internationalism/ICFTU%20-%20Working%20Conditions%20amd%20Labour%20Rights%20in%20Export%20Processiong%20Zones%20-%202004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Ergonomics Association. (2000). Ergonomics international news and information. London: Marshall Associates.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (1996). Ergonomics Checkpoints. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (1998). Declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work. Retrieved from: http://www.ilo.org/declaration/thedeclaration/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (2004). Work improvement in small enterprises (WISE): Package for trainers. Bangkok, Thailand: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kawakami, T., & Kogi, K. (2005). Ergonomics support for local initiative in improving safety and health at work: International Labour Organization experiences in industrially developing countries. Ergonomics, 48(5), 581–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, T., Kogi, K., Toyama, N., & Yoshikawa, T. (2004). Participatory approaches to improving safety and health under trade union initiative-experiences of positive training program Asia. Industrial Health, 42, 196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, B. M. (2006). Macro-ergonomics: Analysis and design of work systems. Ergonomics, 37, 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kron, M., & Fischer, K. (2012). Illegales Elektronikschrottrecycling: Beyond any governance? [Illegal electronic scrap recycling: Beyond any governance?] In K. J. Zink, K. Fischer, & C. Hobelsberger (Eds.), Nachhaltige Gestaltung internationaler Wertschoepfungsketten—Akteure und Governance-Systeme [Sustainable design of international value-added supply chains—Actors and governmental systems] (pp. 225–241). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, R., & Romis, M. (2006). Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization an labor standards in two Mexican Garment Factories. MIT Sloan working paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Christ, G. (2011). Sustainable management: Coping with the dilemmas of resource-oriented management. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlick, C..M., Bruder, R., & Luczak, H. (2010). Arbeitswissenschaften [Ergonomics]. Munich, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. A. (2008). Global inequality, and the challenge for ergonomics to take a more dynamic role to redress the situation. Applied Ergonomics, 39, 495–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steimle, U. (2008). Ressourcenabhaengigkeit und Nachhaltigkeitsorientierung von Unternehmen [Corporate resource dependency and sustainability orientation]. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L., &Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the long wall method of coal getting. Human Relations, 4, 3–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2009). Guidelines for social lifecycle assessment of products. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/pdf/DTIE_PDFS/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Global Compact. (2014). Corporate sustainability in the world economy. Retrieved from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/GC_brochure_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohland, J., & Zink, K. J. (2014). Social-life-cycle assessment (S-LCA): An instrument for Macro-ergonomics in a globalized world? In: O. Broberg, N. Fallentin, P. Hasle, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings 11th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organisational Design and Management & 46th Annual Nordic Ergonomics Society Conference (pp. 183–188). Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J. (Ed.). (2008). Corporate sustainability as a challenge for comprehensive management. Heidelberg, Germany: Physika-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J. (2009). Human factors and ergonomics in industrially developing countries: Necessity and contributions. In: P. A. Scott (Ed.), Ergonomics in developing countries. Needs and applications (pp. 15–27). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J. (2011). Produktentwicklung und Nachhaltigkeit: Notwendigkeit eines Paradigmenwechsels aus arbeitswissenschaftlicher Sicht. In: GfA (Eds.), Mensch, Technik, Organisation—Vernetzung im Produktentstehungs- und herstellungsprozess [Humans, technology, organization—Linkage during the process of product formation and production]. (pp. 181–185). Dortmund, Germany: GfA-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J. (2013). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 126–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar