Evaluating Alternate Visualization Techniques for Overview Displays in Process Control

REFERENCES

• Beck, M. R., Lohrenz, M. C., & Trafton, J. G. (2010). Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: Global and local clutter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Braseth, A. O., & ritsland, T. A. (2013). Visualizing complex processes on large screen displays: Design principles based on the information rich design concept. Displays, 34(3), 215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braseth, A. O., Veland, ., & Welch, R. (2004). Information rich display design. In Proceedings of the Fourth American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation. Columbus, OH: Controls and Human-Machine Interface Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bullemer, P., Reising, D.V., Burns, C., Hajdukiewicz, J., & Andrzejewski, J. (2008). Effective operator display design. Houston, TX: Honeywell International Inc./ASM Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. M., & Hajdukiewicz, J. (2013). Ecological interface design. New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, A., Chintamani, K. K., Pandya, A. K., & Ellis, R. D. (2009). NASA TLX: Software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 113–117. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W..S. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallimonti, R. (1972). Future operator consoles for improved decision-making and safety Instrumentation Technology, 19(8), 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. doi: 10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2000). Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Garland, D. J. (Eds.). (2000). Situation awareness analysis and measurement. New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Jones, D. G. (2012). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Errington, J., Dal Vernon, C. R., Bullemer, P., DeMaere, T., Coppard, D., Doe, K., & Bloom, C. (2005). Establishing human performance improvements and economic benefit for a human-centered operator interface: An industrial evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(23), 2036–2040.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, B., Habibi, E., Nimmo, I., & Oliver, D. (2008). The high performance HMI handbook. Houston, TX: Plant Automation Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, D. N., Follesø, K., Strand-Volden, F., & Torralba, B. (1995). Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms. Ergonomics, 38(11), 2394–2413. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G. A., & Vicente, K. J. (2001). Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: Supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25, 1055–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00678-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessa, M., & Burns, C. M. (2007). Visual sensitivities of dynamic graphical displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 206–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller Jr., W..D. (2010). The US Air Force-developed adaptation of the multi-attribute task battery for the assessment of human operator workload and strategic behavior. Arlington, VA: Consortium Research and Fellows Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-13(3), 257–266. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, R. (2007). Information visualization: Design for interaction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A. (Ed.). (1994). Human factors in alarm design. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis
   Google Scholar
• Tharanathan, A., Bullemer, P., Laberge, J., Reising, D. V., & Mclain, R. (2012). Impact of functional and schematic overview displays on console operators' situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(2), 141–164. doi: 10.1177/1555343412440694
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. doi: 10.1080/14639220210123806
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & Andre, A. D. (1990). Proximity compatibility and information display: Effects of color, space, and objectness on information integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 32(1), 61–77. doi: 10.1177/001872089003200105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(3), 473–494. doi: 10.1518/001872095779049408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar