Towards a path-transformative heuristic in inclusive innovation initiatives: an exploratory case in rural communities in Colombia

References

• Alcaldía Municipal de Cumbal-Nariño. 2017. Alcaldía Municipal de Cumbal-Nariño. Retrieved November 14, 2019, from Municipio. https://bit.ly/32Peqau.
   Google Scholar
• Alcaldía Municipal de Cumbal-Nariño. S.F. Esquema de Ordenamiento Territorial: Fase diagnóstica. Cumbal: Alcaldía Municipal de Cumbal-Nariño.
   Google Scholar
• Alvial Palavicino, C. 2016. Mindful Anticipation: a Practice Approach to the Study of Expectations in Emerging Technologies. Enschede: Gildeprint Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, R., and J. Sutz. 2017. “Science, Technology and Innovation for What? Exploring the Democratization of Knowledge as an Answer.” In Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies, edited by S. Kuhlmann, and G. Ordoñez-Matamoros, 377–404. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Balanzó, A., C. Nupia, and J. Centeno. 2020. “Conocimiento Científico, Conocimientos Heterogéneos y Construcción de paz: Hacia una Agenda de Investigación Sobre Políticas y Gobernanza del Conocimiento en Transiciones Hacia la paz.” OPERA 27: 13–44.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., B. Leca, and E. Boxenbaum. 2009. “How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” The Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 65–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. 2012. "The Social Construction of Bakelite: Toward a Theory of Invention." In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Anniversary ed, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 155–182. London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortagaray, I., and G. Ordoñez-Matamoros. 2012. “Introduction to the Special Issue of the Review of Policy Research: Innovation, Innovation Policy, and Social Inclusion in Developing Countries.” Review of Policy Research 29 (6): 669–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. M. 2015. “Agency in Institutional Reform: Creating the Ethiopia Commodities Exchange.” Public Administration and Development 35: 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. R., M. A. Farrelly, and D. A. Loorbach. 2013. “Actors Working the Institutions in Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Melbourne’s Stormwater Management.” Global Environmental Change 23: 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E. and A. Powell, eds. 2018. La Hora del Crecimiento: Informe Macroeconómico de América Latina y el Caribe. Washington, D.C.: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Chataway, J., C. Daniels, L. Kanger, M. Ramirez, J. Schot, and E. Steinmueller. 2017. Developing and enacting Transformative Innovation Policy: A Comparative Study. Paper prepared for 8th International Sustainability Transitions Conference, 1–27. Gothenburg: Science Policy Research Unit, School of Business, Management and Economics, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Chataway, J., R. Hanlin, and R. Kaplinsky. 2014. “Inclusive Innovation: an Architecture for Policy Development.” Innovation and Development 4 (1): 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cámara de Comercio de Ipiales. 2020. Cámara de Comercio de Ipiales. Obtenido de Consultas y Transacciones. https://sii2.confecamaras.co/vista/plantilla/home.php
   Google Scholar
• COLCIENCIAS. 2015a. A Ciencia Cierta 2015. ID de Postulación: 557. Bogotá D.C.
   Google Scholar
• COLCIENCIAS. 2015b. A Ciencia Cierta. Recuperado el 7 de May de 2020, de Bases del concurso. https://acienciacierta.minciencias.gov.co/index.php/bases-del-concurso.
   Google Scholar
• COLCIENCIAS. 2016. Archivo. Expediente 201653004504000013E. Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• COLCIENCIAS. 2018a. Apropiate. Recuperado el 2 de May de 2019, de Asociación Indígena La Kumba cultiva fresa con criterios agroecológicos. https://bit.ly/33YsOPr
   Google Scholar
• COLCIENCIAS. 2018b. Fórmulas de Cambio T02/Capítulo 18: Agricultura ancestral. Accessed November 18, 2019. Video file. https://bit.ly/2puRQ9D.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., and R. B. Collier. 2002. Shaping The Political Arena: Critical Juncture, Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Consorcio dit. 2017. LA KUMBA Cultivo de fresa con criterios agroecológicos aplicando conocimientos ancestrales. (Consorcio para el Desarrollo) Accessed November 14, 2019. Video file. https://bit.ly/2XfsZD5.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2012. “Transversality and Transition: Green Innovation and New Regional Path Creation.” European Planning Studies 20 (5): 817–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S., and J. Sutz. 2014. “Innovation in Informal Settings: Reflections and Proposals for a Research Agenda.” Innovation and Develpment 4 (1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• DANE. 2019. DANE. Recuperado el 14 de November de 2019, de Pobreza Monetaria y Multidimensional en Colombia 2018. https://bit.ly/2CFJWxh
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 2007. “Path Dependence: a Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science.” Cliometrica 1 (2): 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. 2013. “Creating New Paths? Offshore Wind, Policy Activism, and Peripheral Region Development.” Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., D. Mackinnon, A. Cumbers, and A. Pike. 2015. “Policy Activism and Regional Path Creation: the Promotion of Offshore Wind in North East England and Scotland.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, F. J., and J. Rotmans. 2018. “A Proposed Theoretical Framework for Actors in Transformative Change.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 128: 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by L. G. Zucker, 3–21. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• DNP. n.d. TerriData. Accessed November 13, 2019. Cumbal, Nariño. https://bit.ly/2qMGhuW.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N. 1980. “Cultural Orientations, Institutional Entrepreneurs, and Social Change: ComparativeAnalysis of Traditional Civilizations.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (4): 840–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. 2014. El Tiempo. Sigue el temor de indígenas en zona de volcanes. https://bit.ly/2qU6ck5
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79: 991–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, L.-B., and J. Newig. 2016. “Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature.” Sustainability 8 (476): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 1997. “Social Skill and Institutional Theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (4): 397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C., and R. Heeks. 2013. “Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffussion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers.” European Journal of Development and Research 25 (3): 333–355.
   Google Scholar
• Fressoli, M., E. Arond, D. Abrol, A. Smith, A. Ely, and R. Dias. 2014. “When Grassroots Innovation Movements Encounter Mainstream Institutions: Implications for Models of Inclusive Innovation.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe. 2010. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 760–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• George, G., A. M. McGahan, and J. Prabhu. 2012. “Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framwework and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 661–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Sotarauta. 2019. “Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsh, Matthew, Thomas S. Woodson, Susan Cozzens, Jameson. M. Wetmore, Ogundiran Soumonni, and Rodrigo Cortes 2017. "The Role of Emerging Technologies in Inclusive Innovation: the Case of Nanotechnology in South Africa." Science and Public Policy 45 (5): 597–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., M. Amalia, R. Kinty, and N. Shah. 2013. Inclusive Innovation: Definition, Conceptualisation and future Research Priorities. University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management. Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics. Accessed April 4, 2018. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/publications/workingpapers/di/di_wp53.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., C. Foster, and Y. Nugroho. 2014. “New Models of Inclusive Innovation for Development.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, M., E. Stam, and R. Wenting. 2013. “Path Dependence Research in Regional Economic Development: Cacophony or Knowledge Accumulation?” Regional Studies 47 (8): 1348–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaaa, P., W. Boonc, S. Hyysalod, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A T Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48: 1062–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and A. Rip. 2018. “Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 448–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., P. Stegmaier, and K. Konrad. 2019. “The Tentative Governance of Emerging Science and Technology—A Conceptual Introduction.” Research Policy 48 (5): 1091–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leca, B., J. Battilana, and E. Boxenbaum. 2008. Agency and Institutions: A Review of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Obtenido de Harvard Business School Working Paper. https://hbs.me/2S2fLcA.
   Google Scholar
• Leca, B., and P. Naccache. 2006. “A Critical Realist Approach to Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Organization 13 (5): 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. 1997. "A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis." In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure, edited by M. I. Lichbach and A. S. Zucjerman, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López Córtes, O. A. 2018. “Significados y Representaciones de la Minga Para el Pueblo Indígena Pastos de Colombia.” Psicoperspectivas 3 (17): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution.” Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• MinAgricultura. s.f. Programa Oportunidades Rurales. Recuperado el 28 de 06 de 2020, de SlidePlayer. https://slideplayer.es/slide/3384122/.
   Google Scholar
• MinCiencias. 2020. ¿De qué se trata? Recuperado el 28 de June de 2020, de A Ciencia Cierta. https://acienciacierta.minciencias.gov.co/index.php/que-es-a-ciencia-cierta/que-es.
   Google Scholar
• Munir, K. A., and N. Phillips. 2005. “The Birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies.” Organization Studies 26 (11): 1665–1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Making Innovation Benefit All: Policies for Inclusive Growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, D. F., J. G. York, T. J. Dean, and S. D. Sarasvathy. 2010. “The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories.” Journal of Management 36 (4): 974–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2018. “Framing Inclusive Innovation Within the Discourse of Development: Insights From Case Studies in India.” Research Policy 47: 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, T. 2014. “How Inclusive can Innovation and Development be in the Twenty-First Century?” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, A. N. 2008. “Talent in the Cold? Creative Capital and the Economic Future of the Canadian North.” Artic 61 (2): 162–176.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzón-Camargo, & Ordóñez-Matamoros. 2018. A study of innovation policies and governance structures in emerging economies under the path-dependence framework. The case of Colombia. Manuscript sumbitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Rennkamp, B. 2011. Innovation for all? Legitimizing Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Unequal Societies. Enschede, The Netherlands: Ipskamp drukkers BV.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and J.-P. Voß. 2013. “Umbrella Terms as Mediators in the Governance of Emerging Science and Technology.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2): 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and R. Kemp. 2001. “More Evolution Than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight (los Angeles, Calif ) 3 (1): 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• RTVC. 2016. Noticias. Obtenido de RTVC. https://www.rtvc.gov.co/noticia/la-paz-exige-formar-y-construir-advierten-lideres-de-convivencia.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, F. M. 2007. Path Dependence and Institutional Reform: A Case Study on the Reform of Italian Telecommunications Institutions – 1979-2007. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Government Department.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47 (1): 1554–1567.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G., J. Sydow, and P. Holtmann. 2011. “How History Matters in Organisations: The Case of Path Dependence.” Management & Organizational History 6 (1): 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, and H. Thomas. 2014. “Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and R. Pulkkinen. 2011. “Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: in Search of a Fresh set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies.” C: Government and Policy 29: 96–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaans, K., B. Boogaard, R. Bendapudi, H. Taye, S. Hendrickx, and L. Klerkx. 2014. “Operationalizing Inclusive Innovation: Lessons From Innovation Platforms in Livestock Value Chains in India and Mozambique.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., G. Schreyögg, and J. Koch. 2005. Organizational Paths: Path Dependency and Beyond. 21st EGOS Colloquium, 1–42. Berlin: Free University of Berlin, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., G. Schreyögg, and J. Koch. 2009. “Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box.” Academy of Management Review 34 (4): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., N. Philips, and O. Jarvis. 2011. “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model.” Organizatioin Science 22 (1): 60–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weik, E. 2011. “Institutional Entrepreneurship and Agency.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4): 466–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, Frances, Per Olsson, Carl Folke, Thomas Homer-Dixon, Harrie Vredenburg, Derk Loorbach, John Thompson, et al. 2011. “Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation.” AMBIO 40 (7): 762–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar