Knowledge stocks, government R&D, institutional factors and innovation: evidence from biotechnology patent data

References

• Adams, J. D. 1990. “Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, V., and L. Diaz-Serrano. 2009. “Political Institutions and Telecommunications.” Journal of Development Economics 89: 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. 1989. “A Failure-inducement Model of Research and Development Expenditure.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12: 159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arantes-Oliveira, N. 2007. “A Case Study on Obstacles to the Growth of Biotechnology.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnskov, C., and N. J. Foss. 2008. “Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurial Activity: Some Cross-country Evidence.” Public Choice 134: 307–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boskin, M., and L. Lau. 1996. “Contribution of R&D to Economic Growth.” In Technology, R&D and the Economy, edited by B. Smith and C. Barfield, 75–107. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F., and J. M. Natera. 2013. “The Dynamics of National Innovation Systems: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Coevolution Between Innovative Capability and Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 42: 579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., B. Hall, and A. A. Toole. 2000. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.” Research Policy 29: 497–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duysters, G., and B. Lokshin. 2011. “Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and Its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28: 570–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-government Relations.” Social Science Information 42: 293–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and J. Dzisah. 2007. “The Triple Helix of Innovation: Towards a University-led Development Strategy for Africa.” ATDF Journal 4 (2): 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, M. 2007. “R&D Spending in the High-Tech Sector and Economic Growth.” Research in Economics 61: 140–147.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, X., and Q. G. Yang. 2009. “Exploring the Cross-country Gap in Patenting: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.” Research Policy 38: 1203–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J., and R. Hayes. 2004. “Catching up or Standing Still?.” Research Policy 33: 1329–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J., M. E. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31: 899–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, G., D. Roland-Holst, and D. Zilberman. 2006. “Agricultural Biotechnology and Poverty Reduction in Low-income Countries.” World Development 34: 1430–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, H., and A. Pyka. 2006. “Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage Foundation. 2018. 2018 Index of Economic Freedom. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. D., J. Moon, H. G. Kang, S. C. Lee, and Y. G. Choe. 2012. “Mapping the Dynamics of Knowledge Base of Innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: Triple Helix Perspective.” Scientometrics 90: 57–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., and J. A. Mathews. 2005. “National Innovative Capacity in East Asia.” Research Policy 34: 1322–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., H. Shih, and Y. C. Wu. 2011. “Contagion Effects of National Innovative Capacity: Comparing Structural Equivalence and Cohesion Models.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78: 244–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic Research.” American Economic Review 79: 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, K., and H. Park. 2012. “Influence of Government R&D Support and Inter-firm Collaborations on Innovation in Korean Biotechnology SMEs.” Technovation 32: 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. Y. 2012. “Strategic R&D Alliance Factors That Impact Innovation Success in the Biotechnology Industry.” International Journal of Technology Management 59: 116–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and H.-W. Park. 2012. “Measuring Twitter-based Political Participation and Deliberation in the South Korean Context by Using Social Network and Triple Helix Indicators.” Scientometrics 90: 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer, S. 2009. “Drivers of National Innovation in Transition: Evidence from a Panel of Eastern European Countries.” Research Policy 38: 845–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2011. “The Differential Effects of Public R&D Support on Firm R&D: Theory and Evidence from Multi-country Data.” Technovation 31: 256–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, D. P., and A. N. Link. 1991. “Why are Governmental R&D and Private R&D Complements?” Applied Economics 23: 1673–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 2006. The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal-Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, F. R. 1988. “The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions.” American Economic Review 78: 550–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. Y. 2014. “Effects on Diversity of R&D Sources and Human Capital on Industrial Performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 85: 168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mamuneas, T., and M. Ishaq Nadiri. 1996. “Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the US Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Public Economics 63: 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, P. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, M. 2014. “Research Policy and Endogenous Growth.” Spanish Economic Review 6: 179–209.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, Y., and G. A. Barnett. 2011. “Globalization of Technology: Network Analysis of Global Patents and Trademarks.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78: 1471–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström, K. 2008. “The Institutions of Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Panel Data.” Public Choice 136: 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. OECD Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Biotechnology for Sustainable Growth and Development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2009a. OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2009b. OECD Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. OECD Statistics. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., and C. A. Benavides-Velasco. 2004. “Cooperation, Competition, and Innovative Capability: A Panel Data of European Dedicated Biotechnology Firms.” Technovation 24: 927–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., and N. Hewitt-Dundas. 2015. “Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and Innovation: Evidence from Matched Patents and Innovation Panel Data.” Research Policy 44: 1327–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A. 2010. “What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?” The European Journal of Development Research 22: 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varsakelis, N. C. 2006. “Education, Political Institutions and Innovative Activity: A Cross-country Empirical Investigation.” Research Policy 35: 1083–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization. 2019. WIPO Biotechnology Statistics. Geneva: WIPO.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998. “Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises.” The American Economic Review 88: 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar