Correlation between above-ground and below-ground biomass of 13-year-old Pinus densiflora S. et Z. planted in a post-fire area in Samcheok

References

• Alban DH, Pelata DA, Schlaegel BE. 1978. Biomass and nutrient distribution in aspen, pine and spruce stands on the same soil type in Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 8:290–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan W, Ian A. 2003. Landscape-scale species richness of earthworms in the Porongurup range, Western Australia: influence of aspect, soil fertility, and vegetation type. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 39(2):94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atsushi O, Tomomi N, Michihiro W. 1993. Relationship between root growth angle of seedlings and vertical distribution of roots in the field in wheat cultivars. Japanese Journal Crop Science. 62(4):565–570.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelink HH. 1998. A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. Tree Physiology. 18:91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun JG, Lee WK, Nor DK, Kim SH, Choi JK, Lee YJ. 2010. The relationship between tree radial growth and topographic and climatic factors in red pine and oak in central regions of Korea. Journal of Forest Research 99(6): 908–913.
   Google Scholar
• Cho MG, Chung JM, Jung HR, Moon HS, Kang MY. 2012. Vegetation structure of Picea jezoensis communities in Mt. Deogyu and Mt. Gyebang. Institute of Agriculture & Life Science. 46(6): 33–41. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Drexhage M, Gruber F. 1999. Above- and below stump relationships for Picea abies –estimation root system biomass from breast height diameter-. Scanadinavian Journal of Forest Research. 14:328–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber F. 1994. Morphology of coniferous trees: possible effects of soil acidification on the morphology of Norway spruce and Silver fir. Effects of Acid Rain on forest Processes. 8:265–324.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington G. 1979. Estimation of above-ground biomass of trees and shrubs in a Eucalyptus populnea F. Muell. woodland by regression of mass on trunk diameter and plant height. Australian Journal of Botany. 27(2): 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo HK, Kim JY, Park HM. 2013. Carbon storage and uptake by evergreen trees for urban landscape for Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 27(5): 571–578. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Kim IS, Ryu KO, Lee JW. 2012. Climatic factors affecting bud flush timing of Pinus densiflora provenances. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 14(4): 229–235. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Lee DG. 2000. Growth characteristics and physiological adaptation of Pinus densiflroa seedling in the canopy gap. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 89(3): 452–460. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Kong WS, Lim JH. 2008. Distinctive distribution of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and thermal condition. The Korean Geographical Society. 43(4): 495–510. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Köstler JN, Bruckner E, Bibelriether E. 1968. Die Wurzeln der Waldbaume. hamburg, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey. 284 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kutiel P. 1992. Slope aspect effect on soil and vegetation in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 47(4–6):243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Lacointe A. 2000. Carbon allocation among tree organs: A review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Science. 57:521–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Goff N, Ottorini JM. 2001. Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France. Annals of Forest Science. 58:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledig FT, Borman FH, Wenger KF. 1970. The distribution of dry matter growth between shoot and roots in Loblolly Pine. Botanical Gazette. 131(4):349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DH. 2004a. Estimation above- and below-ground biomass from diameter of breast height and height for the Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 93(3):242–250. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DH. 2004b. Estimation above- and below-ground biomass for Norway Spruce (Picea abies): Estimating root system biomass from breast height diameter. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 90(3):338–345. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DH, Yon JH, Woo KS. 2007. Studies on biomass for young Abies koreana Wilson. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 96(2):138–144. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Kim DG, Bea KH, Suh HM. 2005. The growth characteristics of the main afforestation species using the change of the annual ring in Uiseong area. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 7(4): 274–281. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KJ, Kim KD, Kim JS, Park IH. 1985. Distribution of biomass and production of Pinus rigida and Pinus rigida × teaeda plantation in Kwangju district. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 69:28–35. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SD, Lee KJ, Choi JW. 2009. Management plan to consider ecological characteristic of Pinus densiflora community in Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(3): 258–271. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SW. 1981. Studies on forest soils in Korea (II). Journal of Korea Forest Society. 54:25–35. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Wilis D. 1996. Chemical or air root pruning containers improve carambola. Logan and mongo seedling root morphology and initial root growth after transplanting. Journal of Environment Horticulture. 14(2):47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Na SJ, Kim CS, Woo KS, Kim HJ, Lee DH. 2011. Correlation of above- and below-ground biomass between natural and planted stands of Pinus densiflora for. erecta of one age-class in Gangwon Province. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 100(1):42–51. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Park IH, Chae KS, Kim KS, Kim MS. 2010. Biomass expansion factors and biomass equations of Pinus densiflora in Suncheon, Jeollanam-do. Proceeding of the Korean Forest Society of spring 2010 in Changwon, Korea. 66–68. In Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Park IH, Lee SM. 1990. Biomass and net production of Pinus densiflora natural forests of four local forms in Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 79(2):196–204. In Korean with English abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Qishui Z, John CZ. 1995. Effect of gap size on litter decomposition and microbial activity in a subtropical forest. Ecological Society of America Ecology. 76(7):2196–2204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhrig E. 1966. Die Wurzelentwicklung der Waldbäume in Abhängigkeit von den Ökologischen Verhältnissen. Forstarchiv 34: 217–227, 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Santantonio D. 1990. Modeling growth and production of tree roots. Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Timber, Portland, Ore:124–141.
   Google Scholar
• Seo YO, Lee YJ, Pyo JK, Kim RH, Son YM, Lee KH. 2010. Above- and below-ground biomass and net primary production for Pinus densiflora stands of Cheongyang and Boryeong regions in Chungnam. Journal of Forest Research 99(6): 914–921.
   Google Scholar
• Scott GD, Hawkins CDB. 2005. Competitive interactions in sub-boreal birch-spruce forests differ on opposing slope aspects. Forest Ecology and Management. 214:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage AR. 1976. Notes: an expression for the effect of aspect, slope, and habitat type on tree growth. Forest Science 22(4):457–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH, Marks PL. 1975. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH, editors. Primary productivity of the biosphere. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 55–118.
   Google Scholar