The identification of macro nutrient status of superior teak plantation (Tectona grandis Lin.F) by means of DRIS norms (Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System) in Indonesia

References

• Abod SALI, Siddiqui MT. 1995. Fertilizer requirements of newly planted teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) seedlings. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 25(2):121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Abod SALI, Siddiqui MT. 1998. Growth response of teak (Tectona Grandis L. F.) seedlings to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 25(2):107–113. doi:10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60078-5.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2009. Bibit unggul dan upaya silvikultur intensif (online), http://www.jatiteak.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/bibit-unggul-dan-upaya-silvikultur-intensif-silin/. Retrieved on June 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey JS, Cushnahan A, Beattie JAM. 1997. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) for diagnosing the nutrient status of grassland swards: II. Model calibration and validation. Plant Soil. 197(1):137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard TM. 1985. Foliar analysis for deficiency diagnosis and fertilizer prescription in forestry: variability considerations. In: Luttmerding HA, Lowe LE, Ballard TM, editors. The role of soil analysis in resource management. B.C. Ministry of Environment Tech. Rep. p. 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard TM, Carter RE. 1986. Evaluating forest stand nutrient status. B.C. Min. For., Victoria, Land Manage. Rep. 20. p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Bangroo S, Bhat MI, Ali T, Aziz M, Bhat MA, Wani MA. 2010. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) – a review. Int J Curr Res. 10:84–97.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Liu E, Tian Q, Yan C, Zhang Y. 2014. Soil nitrogen dynamics and crop residues. A review. Agron Sustainable Dev. 34(2):429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0207-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drechsel P, Zech W. 1994. DRIS evaluation of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) mineral nutrition and effects of nutrition and site quality on teak growth in West Africa. Forest Ecol Manage. 70(1–3):121–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Moya J, Murillo R, Portuguez E, Fallas JL, Rios V, Kottman F, Verjansl JM. 2013. Nutrient concentration age dynamics of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). For Syst. 22(1):123–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follett RF. 2008. Transformation and transport processes of nitrogen in agricultural systems. In: Hatfield JL, Follett RF, editors. Nitrogen in the environment. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374347-3.00002-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gama-Rodrigues AC. 2011. Soil organic matter, nutrient cycling and biological dinitrogen-fixation in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 81(3):191–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopikumar K, Varghese V. 2004. Sand culture studies of teak (Tectona grandis) in relation to nutritional deficiency symptoms, growth and vigour. J Trop For Sci. 16:46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardiwinoto S, Sukirno DP, Widiyatno, Chanan M. 2013. Identifikasi Faktor Pembatas Pertumbuhan Jati Ungggul. Laporan Akhir Penelitian DPP. Fakultas Kehutanan UGM. Yogyakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AF, Xu G. 1986. Review of nitrogen distribution and cycling in forest ecosystems. In: Haynes RJ, editor. Mineral Nitrogen in the Plant-Soil System. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; p. 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix PF, Coleman DC, Crossley DA. 1992. Using knowledge of soil nutrient cycling processes to design sustainable agriculture. J Sustainable Agric. 2(3):63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser LC, Fox TR, Carlson CA. 2013. Foliage and litter chemistry, decomposition, and nutrient release in Pinus taeda. Forests. 4(3):595–612. https://doi.org/10.3390/f4030595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchmann H, Bergström L, Kätterer T, Mattsson L, Gesslein S. 2007. Comparison of long-term organic and conventional crop–livestock systems on a previously nutrient-depleted soil in Sweden. Agron J. 99(4):960–972. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence D, Foster D. 2002. Changes in forest biomass, litter dynamics and soils following shifting cultivation in Southern Mexico: an overview. Interciencia. 27(8):400–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison IK. 1974. Mineral nutrition of conifers with special reference to nutrient status interpretation: a review of literature. Can For Serv Publ. 1343:74.
   Google Scholar
• Millkuri CR, Rajendra MP. 2016. Influence of teak plantations on different soil chemical properties in Southern India. Int J Agric Sci Res. 6(6):203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mirasol P. 2016. Optimising fertilizer formulations for smallholders in Asia and Africa. Fertilizer Focus. July/August 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nemecek T, Dubois D, Huguenin-Elie O, Gaillard G. 2011. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Agric Syst. 104(3):217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno T, Griffin T, Liebman M, Porter G. 2005. Chemical characterization of soil phosphorus and organic matter in different cropping systems in Maine, U.S.A. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 105(4):625–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldroyd GED, Dixon R. 2014. Biotechnological solutions to the nitrogen problem. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 26:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviv M, Medina S, Krasnovsky A, Ziadna H. 2004. Organic matter and nitrogen conservation in manure compost for organic agriculture. Compost Sci Utilizat. 12(1):6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroth G, Sinclair FL, editors. 2003. Trees, crops and soil fertility concepts and research methods. Wallingford Oxon (UK): CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz CJ, de Villiers JM. 1987. 6. Foliar diagnosis and fertiliser prescription in forestry—The DRIS system and its potential. South Afr For J. 141(1):6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MT, Shah AH, Yaqoob S. 2009. Chronosequence and crown strata effects on foliar nutrient concentrations in teak (Tectona grandis L.f) plantations. Pak J Bot. 41(6):3023–3034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson GA, Kimberley MO. 1988. Can DRIS improve diagnosis of nutrient deficiency in Pinus radiata? New Zealand J For Sci. 18(1):33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir S, Muhammad, Abod SA, Tariq MA. 2007. Root nutrient concentrations in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantations as influenced by fertilization and age. Can J Pure Appl Sci. 1(1):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka N, Hamazaki T, Vacharangkura T. 1998. Distribution, growth and site requirements of teak. Jpn Agric Res Q. 32(1):65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tewari VP, Gabriel Álvarez-González J, García O. 2014. Developing a dynamic growth model for teak plantations in India. For Ecosyst. 1(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Walworth JL, Sumner ME. 1987. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Soil Sci. 6:149–188.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Owusu-sekyere E, Masunaga T, Buri MM, Oladele OI, Wakatsuki T. 2010. Teak (Tectona grandis) growth as influenced by soil physicochemical properties and other site conditions in Ashanti region, Ghana. J Food Agric Environ. 8:1040–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Liang K, Xu D, Zhang Y, Huang G, Ma H. 2011. Effects of calcium, boron and nitrogen fertilization on the growth of teak (Tectona grandis) seedlings and chemical property of acidic soil substrate. New For. 43(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-011-9276-6.
   Google Scholar