6,683
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Non-timber forest product utilization under community forest management in northern Thailand

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 1-15 | Received 21 Sep 2020, Accepted 07 Dec 2020, Published online: 26 Dec 2020

References

  • Amgrose-Oji B. 2003. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the ‘forest poor’: evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. Int Rev. 5:106–117.
  • Aminu SA, Ibrahim Y, Ismail HA. 2017. Assessment of economic benefits of NTFPs in Southern Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria. J Sci Environ. 2:30–35.
  • Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Börner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev. 64(Suppl 1):S12–S28.
  • Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. World Bank Res Obs. 14(1):73–98.
  • ANSAB. 2010. Participatory inventory of non-timber forest products. Kathmandu: ANSAB.
  • Apipoonyanon C, Kuwornu JKM, Szabo S, Shrestha RP. 2020. Factors influencing household participation in community forest management: evidence from Udon Thani Province, Thailand. J Sustain For. 39(2):184–206.
  • Asrat Z, Tesfaye Y. 2013. Training manual on: forest inventory and management in the context of SFM and REDD+. Wondo Genet: Hawassa University.
  • Atmiş E, Daşdemir İ, Lise W, Yıldıran Ö. 2007. Factors affecting women’s participation in forestry in Turkey. Ecol Econ. 60(4):787–796.
  • Avery TE, Burkhart HE. 1983. Forest measurements. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E. 2008. Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agric Syst. 98(2):147–155.
  • Bahdur B, Chhetri K, Johnsen FH, Yoshimoto A. 2013. Community forestry in the hills of Nepal: determinants of user participation in forest management. Forest Policy Econ. 30:6–13.
  • Blair HW, Olpadwala PD. 1988. Forestry in development planning: lessons from the rural experience. London: Westview Press.
  • Chaiyo U, Garivait S, Wanthongchai K. 2011. Carbon storage in above-ground biomass of tropical deciduous forest in Ratchaburi Province. Thailand. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 58:239–260.
  • Chechina M, Neveux Y, Parkins JR, Hamann A. 2018. Balancing conservation and livelihoods: a study of forest-dependent communities in the Philippines. Conservat Soc. 16(4):420–430.
  • Chen H, Zhu T, Krott M, Maddox D. 2013. Community forestry management and livelihood development in northwest China: integration of governance, project design, and community participation. Reg Environ Change. 13(1):67–75.
  • Coulibaly-Lingani P, Savadogo P, Tigabu M, Oden P-C. 2011. Factors influencing people’s participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Forest Policy Econ. 13(4):292–302.
  • DNP. 2014. Thai plant names Tem Smittinand. Bangkok (in Thai): Forest Herbarium, DNP.
  • DNP. 2017. Threatened plants in Thailand. Bangkok: Forest Herbarium, DNP
  • Dolisca F, Carter DR, McDaniel JM, Shannon DA, Jolly CM. 2006. Factors influencing farmers’ participation in forestry management programs: a case study from Haiti. For Ecol Manag. 236(2–3):324–331.
  • Ezebilo EE, Mattsson L. 2010. Contribution of non-timber forest products to livelihoods of communities in Southeast Nigeria. Int J Sust Dev World. 17(3):231–235.
  • Gilmour D, Malla Y, Nurse M. 2004. Linkages between community forestry and poverty. Bangkok: RECOFTC.
  • Heubach K, Wittig R, Nuppenau E-A, Hahn K. 2011. The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: a case study from Northern Benin. Ecol Econ. 70(11):1991–2001.
  • ITTO. 2006. Achieving the ITTO objective 2000 and sustainable forest management in Thailand: Report of the diagnostic mission. ITTO. [accessed 2018 June 20]. https://www.itto.int/direct/topics/topics_pdf_download/topics_id=3,12,70,000&no=1&disp=inline
  • Jarernsuk S, Petchsri S, Poolprasert P, Wattanadumrong B. 2015. Economic value of non-timber forest products used by the largest Hmong community in Thailand. NU Int J Sci. 12:38–51.
  • Jumbe CBL, Angelsen A. 2007. Forest dependence and participation in CPR management: empirical evidence from forest co-management in Malawi. Ecol Econ. 62(3–4):661–672.
  • Kabir ME, Webb EL. 2006. Saving a forest: the composition and structure of a deciduous forest under community management in Northeast Thailand. Nat Hist Bull Siam Soc. 54:239–260.
  • Kar SP, Jacobson MG. 2012. NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: lesson from Bangladesh. Forest Policy Econ. 14(1):136–142.
  • Kim S, Sasaki N, Koike M. 2008. Assessment of non-timber forest products in Phnom Kok community forest, Cambodia. Asia Europe J. 6(2):345–354.
  • Kumar V. 2015. Impact of non timber forest produces (NTFPs) on food and livelihood security: an economic study of tribal economy in Dang’s District of Gujarat. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 8(2):387–404.
  • Larpkerna P, Eriksen MH, Waiboonya P. 2017. Diversity and uses of tree species in the deciduous dipterocarp forest, Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. NUJST. 25:43–55.
  • Lestari S, Kotani K, Kakinaka M. 2015. Enhancing voluntary participation in community collaborative forest management: a case of Central Java, Indonesia. J Environ Manage. 150:299–309.
  • Liang J, Crowther TW, Picard N, Wiser S, Zhou M, Alberti G, Schulze E-D, McGuire AD, Bozzato F, Pretzsch H, et al. 2016. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science. 354(6309):aaf8957.
  • Lise W. 2000. Factors influencing people’s participation in forest management in India. Ecol Econ. 34(3):379–392.
  • Liu J, Moe KT. 2016. Economic contribution of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to rural livelihoods in the Tharawady District of Myanmar. Int J Sci. 5:12–21.
  • Melaku E, Ewnetu Z, Teketay D. 2014. Non-timber forest products and household incomes in Bonga forest area, Southwestern Ethiopia. J Res. 25(1):215–223.
  • Mianmit N, Jintana V, Sunthornhao P, Kanhasin P, Takeda S. 2017. Contribution of NTFPs to local livelihood: a case study of Nong Sai Sub-district of Nang Rong District under Buriram Province in Northeast Thailand. J Agrofor Environ. 11:123–128.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.
  • MPSAO. 2018. Population in the Mae Phrik Subdistrict Administrative Organization. Lampang (in Thai): MPSAO.
  • Mulenga B, Richardson R, Mapemba L, Tembo G. 2011. The contribution of non-timber forest products to rural household income in Zambia. East Lansing, MI: Department of Agriculture, Food, Resource and Economics, Michigan State University.
  • Murali KS, Shankar U, Shaanker RU, Ganeshaiah KN, Bawa KS. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure, and species composition. Econ Bot. 50(3):252–269.
  • Musyoki JK, Mugwe J, Mutundu K, Muchiri M. 2016. Factors influencing level of participation of community forest associations in management forests in Kenya. J Sustain Forest. 35(3):205–216.
  • Mutenje MJ, Ortmann GF, Ferrer SRD. 2011. Management of non-timber forestry products extraction: local institutions, ecological knowledge and market structure in South-Eastern Zimbabwe. Ecol Econ. 70(3):454–461.
  • Negi S, Pham TT, Karky B, Garcia C. 2018. Role of community and user attributes in collective action: case study of community-based forest management in Nepal. Forests. 9:136.
  • Okumu B, Muchapondwa E. 2017. Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations. South Africa: Working paper 698, Economic Research Southern Africa.
  • ONEP. 2004. Thailand environment monitor series. Bangkok: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
  • ONEP. 2009. Thailand: National report on the implementation of the convention on biological diversity. Bangkok: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
  • Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J. 1994. Rules, games and common-pool resources. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  • Popradit A, Srisatit T, Kiratiprayoon S, Yoshimura J, Ishida A, Shiyomi M, Murayama T, Chantaranothai P, Outtaranakorn S, Phromma I, et al. 2015. Anthropogenic effects on a tropical forest according to the distance from human settlements. Sci Rep. 5:14689.
  • Pragtong K. 1995. Community forestry in Thailand. Bangkok: RFD.
  • R Development Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
  • RECOFTC. 2007. Sharing the wealth, improving the distribution of benefits and costs from community forestry: policy and legal frameworks, synthesis of discussions at the second community forestry forum. Bangkok: RECOFTC, FAO and SNV.
  • Rew LJ, Medd RW, Van de Ven R, Gavin JJ, Robinson GR, Tuitee M, Barnes J, Walker S. 2005. Weed species richness, density and relative abundance on farms in the subtropical grain region of Australia. Aust J Exp Agric. 45(6):711–723.
  • RFD. 2000. Community forest project approval between 2000-present. RFD. [Accessed 30 January 2020]. http://www.forest.go.th/community-extension/2017/02/02/.
  • RFD. 2014. Implementation guidelines for community forest projects of the Royal Forest Department. Bangkok (in Thai): RFD.
  • RFD. 2017. Study of carbon sequestration and biodiversity in the Ban Mae Chiang Rai Community Forest, Northern Thailand. Bangkok (in Thai): RFD.
  • RFD. 2019. Executive summary. Bangkok (in Thai): RFD.
  • Rijal S, Adhikari S, Pant RR. 2019. Non-timber forest products and livelihood linkages: a case of Lamabagar. Nepal. IJMSIR. 13:326–331.
  • Royal Thai Government. 2019. Community Forest Act B.E. 2562. pp. 71–103. Bangkok (in Thai): Royal Thai Government.
  • Sagar R, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS. 2003. Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India. For Ecol Manag. 186(1–3):61–71.
  • Saifullah MK, Kari FB, Othman A. 2018. Income dependency on non-timber forest products: an empirical evidence of the indigenous people in Peninsular Malaysia. Soc Indic Res. 135(1):215–231.
  • Salam MA, Noguchi T, Pothitan R. 2006. Community forest management in Thailand: current situation and dynamics in the context of sustainable development. New Forest. 31(2):273–291.
  • Schaafsma M, Morse-Jones S, Posen P, Swetnam RD, Balmford A, Bateman IJ, Burgess ND, Chamshama SAO, Fisher B, Freeman T, et al. 2014. The importance of local forest benefits: economic valuation of non-timber forest products in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania. Glob Environ Change. 24:295–305.
  • Shanley P, Luz L, Swingland IR. 2002. The faint promise of a distant market: a survey of Belém’s trade in non-timber forest products. Biodivers Conserv. 11(4):615–636.
  • Sharma D, Tiwari BK, Chaturvedi SS, Diengdoh E. 2015. Status, utilization and economic valuation of non-timber forest products of Arunachal Pradesh, India. JFES. 31:24–37.
  • Soe KT, Yeo-Chang Y. 2019a. Livelihood dependency on non-timber forest products: implications for REDD+. Forests. 10:427.
  • Soe KT, Yeo-Chang Y. 2019b. Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: a case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar. For Policy Econ. 100:129–141.
  • Suleiman MS, Wasonga VO, Mbau JS, Suleiman A, Elhadi YA. 2017. Non-timber forest products and their contribution to households income around Falgore Game Reserve in Kano. Ecol Process. 6(1):23.
  • Sunderlin WD. 2006. Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: an assessment of the potential. Forest Policy Econ. 8(4):386–396.
  • Tejaswi PB. 2008. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for food and livelihood security: an economic study of tribal economy in Western Ghats of Karnataka, India [Dissertation]. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University.
  • Thammanu S, Caihong Z. 2014. The growing stock and sustainable utilization of white bamboo, Bambusa membranacea (Munro) C.M.A. Stapleton &N.H. Xia in the natural mixed deciduous forest with teak in Thailand: a case study of Huay Mae Hin Community Forest, Ngao District, Lampang Province. Int J Sci. 3:23–30.
  • Thapa S, Chapman DS. 2010. Impacts of resource extraction on forest structure and diversity in Bardia National Park. Nepal. For Ecol Manag. 259(3):641–649.
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [Accessed 2019 Sept 29]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/.
  • The World Bank. 2001. Sustaining forest: a development strategy. Washington (DC): The World Bank.
  • Tugume P, Buyinza M, Namaalwa J, K. Kakudidi E, Mucunguzi P, Kalema J, Kamatenesi M. 2015. Socio-economic predictors of dependence on non-timber forest products: lessons from Mabira Central Forest Reserve Communities. JAES. 4(2):195–214.
  • Witchawutipong J. 2005. Thailand community forestry. Bangkok: RFD.
  • Yamane T. 1967. Statistics: an introductory analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Zang L, Araral E, Wang Y. 2019. Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China. Land Use Policy. 82:518–527.
  • Zhang D, Owiredu EA. 2007. Land tenure, market, and the establishment of forest plantations in Ghana. For Policy Econ. 9(6):602–610.