Remote sensing based forest canopy opening and their spatial representation

References

• Alkama R, Cescatti A. 2016. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science. 351(6273):600–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya J, Londoño RAD, Hernández GMV. 2008. Análisis de textura en imágenes de satélite en el ámbito de la biodiversidad y la estructura en un bosque de los Andes Colombianos. [Texture analysis in satellite images in the field of biodiversity and structure in a forest in the Colombian Andes]. Gestión y Ambiente. 11(3):137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Baig MHA, Zhang L, Shuai T, Tong Q. 2014. Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance. Remote Sens Lett. 5(5):423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannari A, Morin D, Bonn F, Huete AR. 1995. A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sens Rev. 13(1–2):95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop J, Pagiola S, Landell-Mills N. 2006. La venta de servicios ambientales forestales. [The sale of forest environmental services]. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología.
   Google Scholar
• Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 320(5882):1444–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzai GD, Humacata L, Lanzelotti SL, Montes Galbán E, Principi N. 2019. Teoría y métodos de la Geografía Cuantitativa Libro 2: Por una Geografía empírica. [Theory and methods of Quantitative Geography Book 2: For an empirical Geography]. Instituto de Investigaciones Geográficas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Universidad Nacional de Luján.
   Google Scholar
• Castro MR. 2014. Modelo espacial de probabilidad a la deforestación en bosques para el estado de Oaxaca.” [Probability spatial model of deforestation in forests for the state of Oaxaca]. Master's thesis. Posgrado en Geografía, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernández F. 2000. Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Comput Geosci. 26(4):373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark PE, Hardegree SP. 2005. Quantifying vegetation change by point sampling landscape photography time series. Rangeland Ecol Manage. 58(6):588–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn CA, Roberts AC. 2004. A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification. Int J Remote Sens. 25(20):4287–4308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbert PD, Pidgeon AM, Louis VS, Bash D, Radeloff VC. 2009. The impact of phenological variation on texture measures of remotely sensed imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 2(4):299–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkerley D. 2020. A review of the effects of throughfall and stemflow on soil properties and soil erosion. In: Van Stan IIJT, Gutmann E, Friesen J, editors. Precipitation partitioning by vegetation. Cham: Springer, p. 183–214.
   Google Scholar
• ENVI. 2012. On-line software user’s manual. Boulder (CO): ITT Visual Information Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin SE, Hall RJ, Moskal LM, Maudie AJ, Lavigne MB. 2000. Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images. Int J Remote Sens. 21(1):61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP. 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, user’s manual and program documentation. New York: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, p. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller DO. 2006. Tropical forest monitoring and remote sensing: a new era of transparency in forest governance? Singapore J Trop Geo. 27(1):15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert MA, González-Piqueras J, García-Haro J. 1997. Acerca de los índices de vegetación. [About vegetation indices]. Revista de Teledetección. 8(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1999. Análisis multivariante. [Multivariate analysis]. Vol. 491. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IHak. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern. SMC-3(6):610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey D, Rodrigo GL. 1983. Teorías, leyes y modelos en geografía. [Theories, laws and models in geography]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Huete AR. 1988. A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ. 25(3):295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt ER, Jr, Rock BN. 1989. Detection of changes in leaf water content using near-and middle-infrared reflectances. Remote Sens Environ. 30(1):43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaizumi F, Sidle RC, Kamei R. 2008. Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 33(6):827–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2005. Cuaderno estadístico del estado de Oaxaca. [Statistical notebook of the state of Oaxaca]. México: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2010. Censo de Población y Vivienda. [Census of population and housing]. México: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2017a. Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano versión 3.0 (CEM). [Continuous Mexican elevations]. México: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2017b. Conjunto de datos vectoriales de uso de suelo y vegetación escala 1:250,000, Serie VI (Capa unión). [Vegetation and land use vector data set]. México: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• INTERGRAPH. 2012. Erdas versión 13.0. https://download.hexagongeospatial.com/en/search
   Google Scholar
• Jenks GF. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearbk Cartogr. 7:186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jones HG, Vaughan RA. 2010. Remote sensing of vegetation: principles, techniques, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauth RJ, Thomas GS. 1976. The tasseled cap–a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. LARS Symposia, 159.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Abbott AL, Clark NA, Araman PA. 2005. Active contours on statistical manifolds and texture segmentation. Image Processing, 2005. ICIP 2005. IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 3, p. III–828. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2005.1530520.
   Google Scholar
• Mas JF, Velázquez A, Castro R, Schmitt A. 2002. Una evaluación de los efectos del aislamiento, la topografía, los suelos y el estatus de protección sobre las tasas de deforestación en México. [An assessment of the effects of isolation, topography, soils, and protected status on deforestation rates in Mexico]. R. Raega - O Espaço Geográfico em Análise (RAEGA). 6:61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez Pastor I, Navarro Pedraño J, Gómez I, Koch M. 2009. Análisis de series temporales de vegetación obtenidas mediante teledetección como herramienta para el seguimiento de procesos de desertificación. [Analysis of vegetation time series obtained by remote sensing as a tool for monitoring desertification processes]. Congreso Internacional Sobre Desertificación en Memoria Del Profesor John B. Thornes, 339–342.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz CAC. 2013. Use of satellite images to assess the effects of land cover change on direct runoff from an Andean basin [doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Norman M. 1984. The primary source: tropical forests and our future. Vol. xxxii. New York: W. W. Norton, p. 416, p: ill., maps.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo A, Ruiz MÁ. 2002. SPSS 11: guide for data analysis. New York: McGrawHill.
   Google Scholar
• PAWS Statistics 21 (Release 21.0.0). 2010. Nikiski (AK): Polar Engineering and Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Percy KE. 1989. Vegetation, soils, and ion transfer through the forest canopy in two Nova Scotia lake basins. Water Air Soil Pollut. 46(1–4):73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapov P, Turubanova S, Hansen MC. 2011. Regional-scale boreal forest cover and change mapping using Landsat data composites for European Russia. Remote Sens Environ. 115(2):548–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyatos R, Latron J, Llorens P. 2003. Land use and land cover change after agricultural abandonment. Mt Res Dev. 23(4):362–369.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH, Sorooshian S. 1994. A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ. 48(2):119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi J, Huete AR, Moran MS, Chehbouni A, Jackson RD. 1993. Interpretation of vegetation indices derived from multi-temporal SPOT images. Remote Sens Environ. 44(1):89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman S, Mesev V. 2019. Change vector analysis, tasseled cap, and NDVI-NDMI for measuring land use/cover changes caused by a sudden short-term severe drought: 2011 Texas event. Remote Sens. 11(19):2217.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez JG. 2008. Estado Actual de la Representación y Análisis de Textura en Imágenes. Reporte Técnico. [Current State of the Representation and Analysis of Texture in Images. Technical report]. Reconocimiento de patrones. Habana (Cuba): Centro de Aplicaciones de Tecnología Avanzada (CENATAV).
   Google Scholar
• Rouse J, Jr, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Remote sensing. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Schanda E. 2012. Physical fundamentals of remote sensing. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder TA, Cohen WB, Song C, Canty MJ, Yang Z. 2006. Radiometric correction of multi-temporal Landsat data for characterization of early successional forest patterns in western Oregon. Remote Sens Environ. 103(1):16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvidenko A, Barber CV, Persson R, González P, Hassan R. 2005. Forest and woodland systems. In: R. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, Vol. 1, findings of the condition and trends working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press, p. 587–614.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker CJ. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ. 8(2):127–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2019. Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook. Version 5.0. Reston (VA): USGS.
   Google Scholar
• Welles JM, Cohen S. 1996. Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation. J Exp Bot. 47(9):1335–1342.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder M. 1998. Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog Phys Geogr. 22(4):449–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Liu D. 2014. Accurate mapping of forest types using dense seasonal Landsat time-series. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 96:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar