From agency to root causes: addressing structural Barriers to transformative justice in transitional and post-conflict settings

References

• Andrieu, K., Ferchichi, W., Robins, S., Aloui, A., & Ben Hamza, H. (2015). “To Participate is to have hope”: Victim participation in Tunisia’s transitional justice process. Tunis: Transitional Justice Barometer.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayeb, H. (2012). The marginalization of the small peasantry: Egypt and Tunisia. In R. Bush & H. Ayeb (Eds.), Marginality and Exclusion in Egypt (pp. 72–96). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bargaoui, Z., Tramblay, Y., Lawin, E. A., & Servat, E. (2014). Seasonal precipitation variability in regional climate simulations over Northern basins of Tunisia. International Journal of Climatology, 34(1), 235–248. doi: 10.1002/joc.3683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. (2010). Class dynamics of agrarian change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B., & Price, L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boesten, J., & Wilding, P. (2015). Transformative gender justice: Setting an agenda. Women's Studies International Forum, 51, 75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. (2007). Poverty and neoliberalism: Persistence and reproduction in the global south. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2016). Women's empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359. doi: 10.1002/jid.3210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waardt, M., & Weber, S. (2019). Beyond Victims’ Mere presence: An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 11(1), 209–228. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbach, A., Chappell, L., & Williams, S. (2017). Foreword: Special issue on ‘transformative reparations for sexual violence post-conflict: Prospects and problems’. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(9), 1185–1192. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2017.1366622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elloumi, M. (2013). Trois ans après: Retour sur les origines rurales de la révolution tunisienne. Confluences Méditerranée, 87, 193–203. doi: 10.3917/come.087.0193
   Google Scholar
• Ensor, J., Park, S., Hoddy, E., & Ratner, B. (2015). A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 31, 38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (ed.). (2019). Transitional and transformative justice: Critical and international perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FTDES (Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights). (2018). Rapport annuel des mouvements sociaux 2016-2017. Tunis: FTDES.
   Google Scholar
• Gana, A. (2011). Agriculteurs et paysans, nouveaux acteurs de la société civile et de la transition démocratique en Tunisie. In Observatoire Tunisien de la Transition Démocratique (pp. 273–293). Diwan: Tunis.
   Google Scholar
• Gana, A. (2012). The rural and agricultural roots of the Tunisian Revolution: When food security matters. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(2), 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P. (2019). Introduction. In P. Gready & S. Robins (Eds.), From transitional to transformative justice (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Ensor, J. (2005). Reinventing development?: Translating rights-based approaches from theory into practice. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2014). From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(3), 339–361. doi: 10.1093/ijtj/iju013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2017). Rethinking civil society and transitional justice: Lessons from social movements and ‘new’ civil society. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(7), 956–975. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2017.1313237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2019). From transitional to transformative justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2020). Transitional justice and theories of change: Towards evaluation as understanding. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(2), 280–299. doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddy, E. (in press). Peasants’ rights and agrarian violence: From transitional justice to transformative agrarian justice. Journal of Human Rights.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddy, E. T. (2018). The needs of labour in times of transition: A case study of sharecroppers in Tunisia. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Hoddy, E.T. (2019). Critical realism in empirical research: Employing techniques from grounded theory methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(1), 111–124. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1503400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2001). Critical systems thinking and practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 233–244. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00067-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen, C., Iles, A., & Bacon, C. (2012). Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 17(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambourne, W., & Carreon, V. R. (2016). Engendering transitional justice: A transformative approach to building peace and Attaining human rights for women. Human Rights Review, 17(1), 71–93. doi: 10.1007/s12142-015-0376-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjoo, R. (2017). Introduction: Reflections on the concept and implementation of transformative reparations. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(9), 1130–1203. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2017.1366666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, G., & Wright, J. (2019). Agroecology as a practice-based tool for peacebuilding in Fragile environments? Three stories from rural Zimbabwe. Sustainability, 11(3), 790. doi: 10.3390/su11030790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2014). Systems thinking, critical realism and philosophy: A confluence of ideas. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, P., Vinck, P., Balthazard, M., Hean, S., & Stover, E. (2009). So We will Never Forget: A Population-based Survey on attitudes about social Reconstruction and the Extraordinary Chambers in the courts of Cambodia. Berkeley: Human Rights Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, S. (2011a). Towards victim-centred transitional justice: Understanding the needs of families of the disappeared in postconflict Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5, 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, S. (2011b). “To live as other Kenyans do”: A study of the reparative demands of Kenyan Victims of human rights violations. New York: International Centre of Transitional Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, S. (2012). Challenging the therapeutic ethic: A victim-centred evaluation of transitional justice process in Timor-Leste. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6, 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., & Altieri, M. A. (2017). Agroecology: Science and politics. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rylko-Bauer, B., & Farmer, P. (2016). Structural violence, poverty, and social suffering. The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty, 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Edelman, M., Borras Jr, S. M., Hall, R., Wolford, W., & White, B. (2018). Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethom, H. (1977a). Les Fellahs de la Presqu’ile du Cap Bon (Tunisie). Tunis: Publications de L’Universite de Tunis.
   Google Scholar
• Sethom, H. (1977b). L'agriculture de la presqu'ile du Cap Bon (Tunisie). Tunis: Publications de L’Universite de Tunis.
   Google Scholar
• Sethom, H. (1992). Pouvoir Urbain et Paysannerie en Tunisie. Tunis: Ceres Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2011). What is a person?: Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Walker, M. (2015). Transformative reparations? A critical look at a current trend in thinking about gender-just reparations. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 108–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck, P., & Pham, P. (2014). Searching for lasting peace: Population-based survey on perceptions and attitudes about peace, security and justice in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Vinck, P., Pham, P. N., & Kreutzer, T. (2011). Talking peace: A population-based Survey on attitudes about security, dispute resolution, and post-conflict reconstruction in Liberia. Berkeley: Human Rights Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Waldorf, L. (2019). Afterwords on Aftermaths. In M. Evans (Ed.), Transitional and transformative justice (pp. 161–164). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2017). From victims and mothers to citizens: Gender-just transformative reparations and the need for public and private transitions. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(1), 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Geof. (2003). Staying secure, staying poor: The “Faustian Bargain”. World Development, 31(3), 455–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar