The facilitators of interagency working in the context of European public service reform

References

• Atkinson, M., Jones, M., & Lamont, E. (2007). Multi-agency working and its implications for practice: A review of the literature. Reading: Centre for British Teachers (CfBT).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., Crociani, S., Daniel, S., Feyer, F., Giudici, C., Guerra, J. C., … Zachrisson, H. D. (2018). Comprehensive review of the literature on interagency working with young children, incorporating findings from case studies of good practice in interagency working with young children and their families within Europe. Report to the European Union under grant agreement No. 72706. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., Melhuish, E., Guerra, J. C., Karwowska-Struczyk, M., Petrogiannis, K., Wysłowska, O., & Zachrisson, H. D. (2017). Interagency coordination of services for children and families – Initial literature review. ISOTIS [Report]. Retrieved from: http://www.isotis.org/resources/publications/isotis-publications
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Interpreting British governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borosch, N., Kuhlmann, J., & Blum, S. (2016). Opening up opportunities and risks? Retrenchment, activation and targeting as main trends of recent welfare state reforms across Europe. In V. Schubert (Ed.), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 769–791). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Köster, F. (Eds.). (2016). Governing education in a complex world, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264255364-en
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A., Macdonald, G., Turner, W., & Lloyd, L. (2007). The challenges of joint working: Lessons from supporting people health pilot evaluation. International Journal of Integrated Care, 7, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. L. (2011). NPM in Asian countries. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate companion to new public management (pp. 131–144). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2015). Integrated governance: How? Where? For what? In Governação integrada: a experiência internacional e desafios para Portugal. Lisboa: GovInt. Retrieved from http://www.forumgovernacaointegrada.pt/
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. (2016). Contribution analysis as an approach to enable public managers to demonstrate public value: The Scottish context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29, 690–707. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J., Munro, A., McGillivray, D., Anderson, J., Gray, N., & Tomas, M. (2020). How co-production and co-creation is understood, implemented and sustained as part of improvement programme delivery within the health and social care context in Scotland. Final Report. Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, G., Bunting, L., & Webb, M. L. (2012). Families experiencing multiple adversities: A review of the international literature. Belfast: Barnardo’s Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Einbinder, S. D., Robertson, P. J., Garcia, A., Vuckovic, G., & Patti, R. J. (2000). Interorganizational collabortion in social service organizations: A study of the prerequisites to success. Journal of Children and Poverty, 6(2), 119–140. doi: 10.1080/713675966
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C. (2006). Public management reform in Denmark. Public Management Review, 8, 1. doi: 10.1080/14719030500518956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, J., Leitão, C., Barata, C., Anders, Y., Barnes, J., Barzaghi, A., … Zachrisson, H. D. (2019). Interview study of service providers and coordinators on interagency coordination for children and families. Policies and practices in nine European countries. Report to the European Union under grant agreement No. 72706. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2011). NPM in Anglo-Saxon countries. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate companion to new public management (pp. 83–96). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. F. (2011). NPM in Scandinavia. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate companion to new public management (pp. 113–129). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Heenan, D., & Birrell, D. (2006). The integration of health and social care: The lessons from Northern Ireland. Social Policy & Administration, 40(1), 47–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00476.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. J. (Ed.). (1993). Administrative transformation in central and Eastern Europe: Toward public sector reform in post-communist societies. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2004). Children act 2004. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, S., Nesman, T., & Hernandez, M. (1999). Promising practices: Building collaboration in systems of care. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children’s Mental Health, 1998 Series, Volume VI. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from: https://www.tapartnership.org/SOC/catalogue/docs/BuildingCollaborationinSystemsofCareVolVI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G., & Themessl-Huber, M. (2005). Professional perceptions of joint working in primary care and social care services for older people in Scotland. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(4), 371–385. doi: 10.1080/13561820500165167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz, I., & Valentine, K. (2009). Lessons for Australia from the UK sure start programme, SPRC report 2/09, prepared for department of families, housing, community services and indigenous affairs. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. (Ed.). (1997). Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2011). Public management reform in continental Europe: National distinctiveness. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate companion to new public management (pp. 97–112). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). The shift toward network governance: Drivers, characteristics and manifestations. In S. de Walle & S. Groeneveld (Eds.), Theory and practice of public sector reform (pp. 158). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2020). How do network characteristics influence network managers’ choice of strategies? Public Money & Management, 40(2), 149–159. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1665828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P. (2011). Public policy analysis. Oxford: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded edition. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, J. S. (1998). Catalytic leadership. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, M., Collins, C., Connolly, J., Doyle, M., & McCartney, G. (2017). Working-class discourses of politics, policy and health: I don’t smoke; I don’t drink. The only thing wrong with me is my health. Policy & Politics, 45(2), 231–249. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14534640177927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslin-Prothero, S., & Bennion, A. (2010). Integrated team working: A literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 19, 371–385.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, A. (2007). Context is everything. Public, July 20.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, A., & Pyper, R. (2005). Public management and modernisation in Britain. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. (2018). Rethinking wicked problems as political problems and policy problems. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, C. (2020). Challenging the necessity of new public governance: Co-production by third sector organizations under different models of public management. Public Administration. doi: 10.1111/padm.12672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales (NSW). (2010). Interagency collaboration: Making it work. Sydney: Community Services, Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2001). Clarifying convergence: Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review, 3, 4. doi: 10.1080/14616670110071847
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2002). The new public management in international perspective. An analysis of impacts and effects. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management. Current trends and future prospects (pp. 274–292). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2007). One size does not fit all. Public, June 22.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckhart, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyper, R. (2015). Public administration, public management and governance. In A. Massey & K. Johnston Miller (Eds.), International handbook of public administration and governance (pp. 13–34). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L., & Araújo, L. (2016). Modelos de análise das políticas públicas. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas [Online], 83. Retrieved from http://spp.revues.org/2662
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (2005). From elections to democracy. Building accountable government in Hungary and Poland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00003846
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, P. (2009). Improving development outcomes for children through effective practice in integrating early years services. London: Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Children and Young People’s Services (C4EO).
   Google Scholar
• Slay, J., & Stephens, L. (2013). Co-production in mental health: A literature review. London: New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., Sylva, K., Smith, T., Sammons, P., & Omonigho, A. (2018). Stop start. Survival, decline or closure? Children’s centres in England. London: The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Statham, J. (2011). Working together for children. A review of international evidence on interagency working, to inform development of children’s services committees in Ireland. Dublin: Department of Child and Youth Affairs, Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2016). Introduction: Trends in West European local government. In R. Batley & G. Stoker (Eds.), Local government in Europe: Trends and developments (pp. 1–20). Hampshire: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (2006). From commitment to consequences. Comparative experiences of decentralisation in the Philippines, Indonesia and Cambodia. Public Management Review, 8, 2. doi: 10.1080/14719030600587471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmington, P., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Brown, S., Leadbetter, J., Martin, D., & Middleton, D. (2004). Interagency collaboration: A review of the literature. Bath: University of Bath.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103–124. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, O., Sarre, S., Papoulias, S. C., Knowles, S., Robert, G., Beresford, P., & Palmer, V. J. (2020). Lost in the shadows: Reflections on the dark side of co-production. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar