Brexit, Europe and othering

References

• Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Arnorsson, A., & Zoega, G. (2016). On the causes of Brexit, Working paper 6056. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., & Budd, L. (2019). Brexit and beyond: A Pandora’s box? Contemporary Social Science, 14(2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/21582041.2019.1621365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. (2005). Islands of the mind: New Labour's defensive engagement with the European Union. Political Quarterly, 76(1), 22–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis, Working Paper 6438. Munich: Leibniz Institute for Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. (2017). Brexit, Trump and “methodological whiteness”: on the misrecognition of race and class. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), 214–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, P. (1991). Ethnicity and nationalism: Theory and comparison. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, I. (2017). Neo-liberalism, identity and Brexit. Romanian Review of Political Science and International Relations, 14(1), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bruter, M. (2003). Winning hearts and minds for Europe: The impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural identity. Comparative Political Studies, 36(10), 1149–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruter, M. (2004). On what citizens mean by feeling “European”: perceptions of news, symbols and borderless-ness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(1), 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The emergence of a mass European identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bruter, M. (2009). Time bomb? The dynamic effect of news and symbols on the political identity of European citizens. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1498–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSA. (2016). Key findings: A kind-hearted but not soft-hearted country, report 34. Retrieved from https://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspx
   Google Scholar
• BSA. (2019). Post-Brexit public policy: How should Britain use its newly acquired sovereignty? Public attitudes towards post-Brexit public policy, report 37. Retrieved from https://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/39375/bsa37_post-brexit-public-policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2017). Populism, nationalism and Brexit. In W. Outhwaite (Ed.), Brexit: Sociological responses (pp. 56–76). London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2002). Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387–413.
   Google Scholar
• Cinnirella, M. (1996). A social identity perspective on European integration. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 253–274). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cinnirella, M. (1997). Towards a European identity? Interactions between the national and European social identities manifested by university students in Britain and Italy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. (2016). A demographic rationale for Brexit. Population and Development Review, 42(4), 681–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtice, J. (2017). ‘The vote to leave the EU: litmus test or lightning rod?’ in British Social Attitudes Survey, London: Natcen. Retrieved from http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/39149/bsa34_brexit_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daddow, O. (2013). Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Eurosceptic tradition in Britain. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15(2), 210–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, N. (1999). The Isles: a History. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10(2), 149–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, P. (2016). The truth about Brexit. Retrieved from https://www.globalchange.com/truth-about-brexit-what-next-in-the-uk-v-eu-divorce-short-term-and-long-term.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2016). Brexit: The decision of a divided country. British Medical Journal, 354, i3697.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dustmann, C., & Frattini, T. (2014). The fiscal effects of immigration to the UK. Economic Journal, 124(580), 593–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2000). Eurobarometer survey Report 52. Brussels: EC.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer survey Report 71: The future of Europe. Brussels: EC.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Strengthening European identity through education and culture. EC contribution to Leaders’ meeting, Gothenburg, 17 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Eurobarometer survey Report 89: European citizenship. Brussels: EC.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Mellon, J. (2019). Immigration, Euroscepticism and the rise and fall of UKIP. Party Politics, 25(1), 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, C., & Parsons, C. (2015). One woman’s prejudice?’ Did Margaret Thatcher cause Britain’s anti-Europeanism? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(1), 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, R. (2019). “Cry God for Harry, England and Saint George”: Europe and the limits of integrating identity. Global Discourse, 9(1), 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., & Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate level analysis of the result. Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., & Milazzo, C. (2017). Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(3), 450–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, C. (2008). Why is Britain Eurosceptic? London: Centre for European Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, P., & Morris, M. (2017). An immigration strategy for the UK. London: IPPR.
   Google Scholar
• Hänska, M., & Bauchowitz, S. (2017). Tweeting for Brexit: how social media influenced the referendum. LSE Research Online eprints.lse.ac.uk/84614/1/Hanska-Ahy__tweeting-for-brexit.pdf (Accessed 12 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, E. (2009). Degrees of independence: SNP thinking in an international context, The modern SNP: from protest to power (pp. 180–203). Edinburgh University Press
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, M., Morgan, S., Walter, B., & Bradley, J. (2005). The limitations of whiteness and the boundaries of Englishness. Ethnicities, 5(2), 160–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, A. (2018). Brit(ish): on race, identity and belonging. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichijo, A. (2004). Scottish nationalism and the idea of Europe: Concepts of Europe and the nation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, M. (2015). The rise of a political Englishness. Political Insight, 6(2), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lammy, D. (2020). Tribes: How our need to belong can make or break the good society. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Legrain, P. (2006). Immigrants: Your country needs them. London: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, M., & Soule, D. (2012). Political discourse and national identity in Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. (2004). The cognitive origins of Bourdieu’s habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 375–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, S. (2017). Breaking point? An examination of the politics of othering in Brexit Britain, TLI think! Paper 69/2017. London: Kings College.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). “A phantom menace and the new apartheid”: the social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse and Society, 14(4), 425–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccaferri, M. (2017). British intellectuals and the European idea after the Suez crisis (1956): narrating Europe between history and politics. Journal of British Identities, 1, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., & Bialasiewicz, L. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Europe and its others. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 107(2), 129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2003). National identity and support for European integration, Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/11155/ssoar-2003-marks_et_al-national_identity_and_support_for.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, D. (1998). The sociology of nationalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2016). European identity and citizen attitudes to cohesion policy: What do we know? Glasgow: Cohesify Research Paper 1.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, A., & Wager, A. (2020). Taking back control: Sovereignty as strategy in Brexit politics. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(2), 279–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics 2020. Migration statistics quarterly report. ONS.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, T. (2015). Europe’s British question: The UK–EU relationship in a changing Europe and multipolar world. Global Society, 29(3), 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormston, R. (2015). Disunited kingdom: Attitudes to the EU across the UK, NatCen. Retrieved from https://whatukthinks.org/eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Analysis-paper-3-Disunited-kingdom.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, F. (2020). Three years in Hell: The Brexit chronicles. London: Head of Zeus.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, S. (1963). Dark strangers: Sociological study of the absorption of a recent West Indian migrant group in Brixton, South London. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, T., & Phillips, M. (1998). Windrush: The irresistible rise of multi-racial Britain. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (2017). Us vs them: the sinister techniques of “othering” – and how to avoid them. Guardian 8 November. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/08/us-vs-them-the-sinister-techniques-of-othering-and-how-to-avoid-them
   Google Scholar
• Ramley, Z., Rossiter, L., & Harris, M. (2019). The European elections: How the Brexit Party won the online battle in the UK. London: 89up.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., & Grabowsky, J. K. (2008). European identity formation in the public sphere and in foreign policy. RECON online working paper 2008/04. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2001). A European identity? Europeanization and the evolution of nation-state identities. In M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe (pp. 198–216). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2003). The Euro between national and European identity. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2014). No demos? Identities and public spheres in the Euro crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1207–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. (2004). “Europe”, national identities and multiple others. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(4), 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiering, M. (2015). A cultural history of British Euroscepticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Startin, N. (2016). The Brexit referendum and the future of the EU, University of Bath blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/iprblog/2016/07/18/the-brexit-referendum-and-the-future-of-the-eu/
   Google Scholar
• Swales, K. (2016). Understanding the leave vote. London: NatCen Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, J., & Zuo, L. (2018). Othering the European Union through constructing moral panics over “im/migrant(s)” in the coverage of migration in three British newspapers, 2011-2016. International Communication Gazette, doi:10.1177/1748048518802237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournier-Sol, K. (2015). Reworking the Eurosceptic and conservative traditions into a populist narrative: UKIP’s winning formula? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(1), 140–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, O. (2019). Global Britain and the narrative of empire. Political Quarterly, 90(4), 727–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrrell, N., Sime, D., Kelly, C., & McMellon, C. (2018). Belonging in Brexit Britain: Central and Eastern European 1.5 generation young people’s experiences. Population Space and Place, 25(1). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/psp.2205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Zwet, A., Bucken-Knapp, G., & Cox, R. (2015). European integration and mainstreaming stateless, nationalist and regionalist parties. In U. Korkut & K. Mahendran (Eds.), Discursive governance in politics, policy and the public sphere (pp. 163–177). New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wintle, M. (2016). Islam as Europe’s “other” in the long term: Some discontinuities. History, 101(344), 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar