Recognition and ideology: assessing justice and injustice in the case of child domestic labor

References

• Agência de Notícias dos Direitos da Infância, 2003. Crianças invisíveis: o enfoque da imprensa sobre o trabalho infantil doméstico e outras formas de exploração [Invisible Children: press coverage on child domestic labor and other forms of exploitation]. São Paulo: Cortez.
   Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L.M., 1991. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.10.2307/1354221
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., 2007. Misrecognition, power and democracy. In: B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen, eds. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 238–269.10.1017/CBO9780511498732
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. and Kitzinger, J., 2001. Developing focus group research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Black, M., 2002. A handbook on advocacy: child domestic workers finding a voice. Horsham: Printed Word/Anti-Slavery International.
   Google Scholar
• Blagbrough, J., 2008. Child domestic labor: a modern form of slavery. Children & Society, 22, 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2000. “When the water chokes”: ideology, communication, and practical rationality. Constellations, 7 (3), 382–392.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2007. Beyond distributive justice and struggles for recognition freedom, democracy, and critical theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 6 (3), 267–276.10.1177/1474885107077310
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Boyden, J., 1997. Childhood and the policy makers: a comparative perspective on the globalization of childhood. In: A. James and A. Prout, eds. Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: UK Falmer Press, 187–226.
   Google Scholar
• Cal, D., 2007. Entre o privado e o público: contextos comunicativos, deliberação e trabalho infantil doméstico [Between the private and the public: communicative contexts, deliberation and child domestic labor]. Dissertation (M.Phil.). Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da UFMG, Belo Horizonte.
   Google Scholar
• Cal, D. and Maia, R.C.M., 2012. Making sense about child domestic labor: between diplomatic or agonistic deliberation. In: R.C.M. Maia, ed. Media, deliberation and political talk. New York: Hampton Press, 255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro, M.T. and Rocha, E., 2009. Do fundo do buraco: o drama social das empregadas domésticas [The bottom of the hole: the social drama of domestic workers]. In: J. Souza, ed. org. A ralé brasileira: quem é e como vive [The Brazilian “ralé”: who are they and how do they live?]? Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Deranty, J.-P., 2012. Expression and cooperation as norms of contemporary work. In: N.H. Smith and J.-P. Deranty, eds. New philosophies of labor: work and the social bond. Leiden, HO: Brill, 151–180.
   Google Scholar
• Duchesne, S. and Haegel, F., 2010. What political discussion means and how do the French and (French-Speaking) Belgians deal with it? In: K. Ikeda, M.R. Wolf, and L. Morales, eds. Political discussion in modern democracies: a comparative perspective. New York: Routledge, 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Earls, F., ed., 2011. The child as citizen. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 6–16.10.1177/0002716210383637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2007. First things first: redistribution, recognition and justification. European Journal of Political Theory, 6 (3), 291–304.10.1177/1474885107077318
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W.A., 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R., 1981. The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Gomberg-Muñoz, R., 2010. Willing to work: agency and vulnerability in an undocumented immigrant network. American Anthropologist, 112 (2), 295–307.10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R.E., 1985. Protecting the vulnerable. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M. and Honneth, A., 2006. Paradoxes of capitalism. Constellations, 13 (1), 41–58.10.1111/cons.2006.13.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2010. Power: a ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13 (4), 419–438.10.1177/1367549410377152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 1996. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2002. Grounding recognition: a rejoinder to critical questions. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 45 (4), 499–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2003. Redistribution as recognition: a response to Nancy Fraser. In: N. Fraser and A. Honneth, eds. Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso, 110–197.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2004. Organized self-realization. Some paradoxes of individualization. European Journal of Social Theory, 7, 463–478.10.1177/1368431004046703
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2007. Recognition as ideology. In: B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen, eds. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 323–347.10.1017/CBO9780511498732
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2010. Work and recognition: a redefinition. In: H.-C.S. Busch and C.F. Zurn, eds. The philosophy of recognition: historical and contemporary perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 223–239.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2012. The I in we – studies in the theory of recognition. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyos, S., 2000. Y quién la mandó a ser niña? El trabajo infantil doméstico desde una perspectiva de género [Who asked her to be a girl? Child domestic labor from a gender perspective]. In: G.A. Vargas, E. García-Méndez, and S. Hoyos, eds. Trabajo infantil doméstico: quién la mandó a ser niña [Child domestic labor: Who asked her to be a girl?]? TM Editores/UNICEF: Bogotá, 109–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ikäheimo, H., 2009. A vital human need: recognition as inclusion in personhood. European Journal of Political Theory, 8 (1), 31–45.10.1177/1474885108096958
   Google Scholar
• International Labor Organization., 2013. Ending child labor in domestic work and protecting young workers from abusive working conditions. Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Kompridis, N., 2007. Struggling over the meaning of recognition: a matter of identity, justice, or freedom? European Journal of Political Theory, 6 (3), 277–289.10.1177/1474885107077311
   Google Scholar
• Lamarão, M.L.N., 2008. A constituição das relações sociais de poder no trabalho infanto-juvenil doméstico: estudo sobre estigma e subalternidade [The constitution of social power relations in child domestic labor: a study on stigma and subordination]. Dissertation (PhD). Universidade Federal do Pará.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarão, M.L.N., Menezes, S.M.L. and Ferreira, W.B., 2000. O trabalho doméstico de meninas em Belém [The domestic labor of girls in Belem]. Belém: Cedeca-Emaús.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maia, R.C.M., 2012a. Deliberation, the media and political talk. New York: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maia, R.C.M., 2012b. Non-electoral political representation: expanding discursive domains. Representation, 48, 429–443.10.1080/00344893.2012.712547
   Google Scholar
• Maia, R.C.M and Garcêz, R.L.O, 2013. Recognition, feelings of injustice and claim justification: a case study of deaf people’s storytelling on the internet. European Political Science Review, 1–24, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000143 [Accessed 10 September 2013].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, R.C.M. and Vimieiro, A.C, 2013. Recognition and moral progress: a case study about discourses on disability in the media. Political Studies, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12083[Accessed 10 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Molinier, P., 2012. Care as work: mutual vulnerabilities and discrete knowledge. In: N.H. Smith and J.-P. Deranty, eds. New philosophies of labor: work and the social bond. Leiden, HO: Brill, 251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L., 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B., 2008. On public deliberation and public culture. In: H. Wessler, ed. Public deliberation and public culture: the writings of Bernhard peters, 1993–2005. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 68–118.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A. and James, A., 1997. A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In: A. James and A. Prout, eds. Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: UK Falmer Press, 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Renault, E., 2010. Taking on the inheritance of critical theory: saving Marx by recognition? In: H.-C.S. Busch and C.F. Zurn, eds. The philosophy of recognition: historical and contemporary perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 241–257.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M.L., 2009. Rereading Honneth: exodus politics and the paradox of recognition. European Journal of Political Theory, 8 (2), 183–206.10.1177/1474885108100852
   Google Scholar
• Rössler, B., 2007. Work, recognition, emancipation. In: B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen, eds. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 135–163.10.1017/CBO9780511498732
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C.F., 2008. Deliberative freedom: deliberative democracy as critical theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, J., 2007. Accountability in an unequal world. The Journal of Politics, 69 (3), 616–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, T., 2003. Ideology, racism and critical social theory. The Pilosophical Forum, 34 (2), 153–188.10.1111/phil.2003.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N.H., 2009. Work and the struggle for recognition. European Journal of Political Theory, 8 (1), 46–60.10.1177/1474885108096959
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N.H., 2012. Work as a sphere of norms, paradoxes, and ideologies of recognition. In: S. O’Neill and N.H. Smith, eds. Recognition theory as social research: investigating the dynamics of social conflict. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, NY, 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N.H. and Deranty, J.P., 2012. New philosophies of labour: work and social bond. Leiden, HO: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, J., org, 2006. A invisibilidade da desigualdade brasileira [The invisibility of Brazilian inequality]. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, J., org, 2009. A ralé brasileira: quem é e como vive [The Brazilian “ralé”: who are they and how do they live?]? Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P., 1989. A formação da classe operária inglesa: a força dos trabalhadores [The formation of the British working class: the force of workers]. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., 2009. Bridging the divide between the press and civic society: civic media advocacy as “media movement” in Latin America. Nordicon Review, 30, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2007. Recognition of love’s labor: considering Axel Honneth’s feminism. In: B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen, eds. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 189–212.10.1017/CBO9780511498732
   Google Scholar