On the social evolution of power to/over

References

• Alexander, R.D., 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325–383.10.1146/ecolsys.1974.5.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1969. On violence. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, S., 1999. The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blute, M., 2010. Darwinian sociocultural evolution: solutions to dilemmas in cultural and social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804755
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, V., 1999. Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H., 1978. The Whig interpretation of history. New York: AMS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R., 2009. Conflict sociology: a sociological classic updated, abridged and updated by S. K. Sanderson. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Cowgill, G., 1997. State and society at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 129–161.10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2 (3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2000. On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darmon, I., 2011. No ‘new spirit’? Max Weber’s account if the dynamic of contemporary capitalism through ‘pure adaptation’ and the shaping of adequate subjects. Max Weber Studies, 11 (2), 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R., 1989. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D.C., 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meaning of life. New York: Simon Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Domhoff, G.W., 1983. Who rules America now? New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., 1986. How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., 2006. Setting the people free: the story of democracy. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, W.H., 1991. Coevolution: genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2000. Power, essential works of Michel Foucault, 1854–1984. J.D. Faubion, ed., R. Hurley and others, trans. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, M.H., 1967. The evolution of political society: an essay in political anthropology. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D.J., 2013. Evolution. 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gomory, R. and Sylla, R., 2013. The American corporation. Daedalus, 142 (2), 102–118.10.1162/DAED_a_00207
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.A., 2013. The importance of being civil: the struggle for political decency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2011. The strength of weak legitimacy: a cultural analysis of legitimacy in capitalist, liberal, democratic nation-states. Journal of Political Power, 4 (2), 199–216.10.1080/2158379X.2011.589179
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2012. Theorizing power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2014. Competition as ritual and the legitimation of the liberal nation-state. In: R. Tsang and E.T. Woods, eds. The cultural politics of nationalism and nation-building: ritual and performance in the forging of nations. London: Routledge, 68–83.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., 1987. Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G.M. and Knudsen, T., 2010. Darwin’s conjecture: the search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226346922.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D.L., 1988. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D.L., 2001. Science and selection: essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, A.L., 1917. The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19 (2), 163–213.10.1525/aa.1917.19.2.02a00010
   Google Scholar
• Lewins, T., 2007. Darwin. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. 1st ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1986. The sources of social power. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570896
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1993. The sources of social power. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570902
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2012. The sources of social power. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2013. The sources of social power. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E., 1995. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, A., 2011. Cultural evolution: how Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Micklethwaite, J. and Woolridge, A., 2005. The company: a short history of a revolutionary idea. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S., 1986. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, P. and Lenski, G., 2006. Human societies: an introduction to macrosociology. 10th ed. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1977. The evolution of societies. J. Toby, ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 2002[1963]. On the concept of political power. M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R., 2005. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman, W.G., 2009. The theory of cultural and social selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819889
   Google Scholar
• Ruse, M., 1997. Monad to man: the concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E., 1917. Do we need a “superorganic”? American Anthropologist, 19 (3), 441–447.10.1525/aa.1917.19.3.02a00150
   Google Scholar
• Service, E. R., 1975. Origins of the state and civilization: the process of cultural evolution. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Spruyt, H., 1994. The sovereign state and its competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, J.H., 1972. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 1984. Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wenke, R.J. and Olszewski, D.I., 2007. Patterns in prehistory: humankind’s first three million years. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D.H., 2002. Power: its forms, bases and uses. 2nd ed. New Brunswicke: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R., 1987. Meaning and moral order: explorations in cultural analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar