Dahl’s feminism?

References

• Allen, A., 2010. Recognizing domination: recognition and power in Honneth’s critical theory. Journal of Power, 3 (1), 21–32.10.1080/17540291003630338
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1997. The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, M.L. and Messing-Mathie, A., 2013. Gender quotas and comparative politics: past, present, and future research agendas. Politics & Gender, 9 (3), 299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1940. Socialist programs and democratic politics: an analysis. Dissertation (PhD). Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1947. The science of public administration: three problems. Public Administration Review, 7 (1), 1–11.10.2307/972349
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1955. The science of politics: new and old. World Politics, 7 (3), 479–489 ( review of David Easton, The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, and Eric Voegelin, The New Science of Politics: An Introductory Essay).10.2307/2009004
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1963. Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1967. Pluralist democracy in the United States: conflict and consent. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1970. After the revolution? Authority in a good society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1971. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1980. Political equality and political rights. Il Politico: Rivista Italiana di Scienze Politiche, XLV (4), 557–570.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1985. Controlling nuclear weapons: democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse, NJ: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1986. Democracy, liberty and equality. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1989a. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1989b. The pseudodemocratization of the American presidency. In: S. McMurrin, ed. The Tanner lectures on human values delivered at Harvard University, 11–12 April 1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–71.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1991. Reflections on a preface to democratic theory. Government and Opposition, 26 (3), 292–301.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1994. The new American political (dis)order. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1996. Equality versus inequality. PS. Political Science & Politics, 29 (4), 639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1997. Toward democracy – a journey: reflections, 1940–1997. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view. In: I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon, eds. Democracy’s edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2001. How democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2002. For a more democratic union the sad fact is that the US Constitution falls woefully short of being the model document for a modern republic, a constitutional overhaul, within the framers’ guidelines. Boston Globe, 21 July, p. D.1.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2005a. After the gold rush: growing up in Skagway. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2005b. What political institutions does large-scale democracy require? Political Science Quarterly, 120 (2), 187–197.10.1002/j.1538-165X.2005.tb00543.x
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2006a. On political equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2006b. Political equality, then and now. The Tocqueville Review, 27 (2), 461–475.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2006c. Reflections on human nature and politics: from genes to political institutions. In: L. Berman, ed. The art of political leadership: essays in honor of Fred I. Greenstein. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. and Brown, R.S., Jr., 1951. Domestic control of atomic energy. New York: Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. and Lindblom, C.E., 1953. Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. and Tufte, E.R., 1973. Size and democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, P., 1975. !Kung women: contrasts in sexual egalitarianism in foraging and sedentary contexts. In: R.R. Reiter, ed. Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 77–109.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Y., 2006. Bringing women in: global strategies for gender parity in political representation. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 6 (2), 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, M., 2007. Current issues and future directions in hunter-gatherer studies. Anthropos, 102, 371–388.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54.10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R.B., 1992. Art, science or politics? The crisis in hunter-gatherer studies. American Anthropologist, 94 (1), 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Leacock, E., 1978. Women’s status in egalitarian society: implications for social evolution. Current Anthropology, 19 (2), 247–275.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C.A., 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C.A., 2001/2007. Sex equality. New York: Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C.A., 2007. Women’s status, men’s states. In: C.A. MacKinnon, ed. Are women human? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C.A., 2012. Gender in world constitutions. In: M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajo, eds. Handbook on comparative constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 418.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, G.S. and Widerquist, K., 2015. The evolution of equality: rethinking variability and egalitarianism among modern forager societies. Ethnoarchaeology, 7 (1), 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Millett, K., 1969. Sexual politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, M.Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., 1974. Woman, culture and society. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ruiz, B. and Rubio-Marin, R., 2009. Constitutional justification of parity democracy. Alabama Law Review, 60 (5), 1171–1195.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D.E.H., 1983. The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of female children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7 (2), 133–146.
   Google Scholar