The concept of power in the analysis of organisations with social and political goals

References

• Allen, A., 1998. Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13 (1), 21–40.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1999. The power of feminist theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On violence. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S., 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, T., 1992. New Faces of Power. In: T. Wartenberg, ed. Rethinking power. Albany: State University of New York Press, 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., 1988. The nature of power. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446279267
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., and Phillips, N., 2006. Power and organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2, 463–469.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54 (4), 977–1007.10.2307/2132105
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 1991. Rational choice and political power. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 1996. Power. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A., 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M., 1959. Political parties: their organisation and activity in the modern state (B. North and R. North, Trans.). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1979. The will to knowledge: the history of sexuality. Vol. I. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, W., 2008. The changing patterns of group politics in Britain. British Politics, 3 (2), 204–222.10.1057/bp.2008.3
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1), 87–113.10.1177/1368431003006001562
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54.10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• McDaid, S., 2010. Redefining empowerment in mental health: an analysis using Hannah Arendt’s power concept. Journal of Power, 3 (2), 209–225.10.1080/17540291.2010.493701
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, R., 1955. British political parties: the distribution of power within the conservative and labour parties. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R., [1915] 1962. Political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchal tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkin, L., 1978. The labour party conference: a study in the politics of intra-party democracy. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, A., 1988. Political parties: organisation and power (M. Silver, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. Power to and power over : two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89.10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1963. On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107 (3), 232–262.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., 1997. New directions for organization theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N., 1978. Political power and social classes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, D., 2014a. Political parties and power: a new framework for analysis. Political Studies, doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12143.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, D., 2014b. Political parties and the concept of power. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137331601
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 1976. Parties and party systems: a framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S., 1996. Parties and their members. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198279183.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 1987. Organizations: rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. and Davis, G.F., 2007. Organization and organizing: rational, natural and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E.E., 1960. The semi-sovereign people: a realists view of democracy in America. London: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E., 1988. Discipline and discord in the labour party: the politics of managerial control in the labour party 1951–87. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shil, R., 2000. The foundations of eclecticism: the epistemological status of agency. Culture, and Structure in Social Theory’ in Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12 (3), 353–387.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., 2006. Why politics matters: making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T.E., 1990. The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1948. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. (H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D., 2002. Power: its forms, bases, and uses. 3rd ed. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar