1,800
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power

References

  • Abdenur, A. , 2015. Brazil as a rising power: coexistence through universalism. In: C. Coning , T. Mandrup , and L. Odgaard , eds. The BRICS and coexistence: an alternative vision of world order . Abingdon: Routledge, 49–74.
  • Abdenur, A. and Gama, C.F.S. , 2015. Triggering the norms cascade: Brazil’s initiatives for curbing electronic espionage. Global Governance , 21, 455–474.
  • Abdenur, A. and Souza Neto, D. , 2013. Brazil’s maritime strategy in the South Atlantic: the nexus between security and resources. SAIIA Occasional Paper , 161, 1–14.
  • Abdenur, A. and Souza Neto, D. , 2014a. Region-building by rising powers: the South Atlantic and Indian Ocean rims compared. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region , 10 (1), 1–17.10.1080/19480881.2014.896103
  • Abdenur, A. and Souza Neto, D. , 2014b. Rising powers and the security–development nexus: Brazil’s engagement with Guinea-Bissau. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development , 9 (2), 1–16.10.1080/15423166.2014.950118
  • Adams, S. , 2013. O Brasil poderá salvar a ONU? [Will Brazil save the UN?] Estadão . Available from: http://internacional.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,o-brasil-podera-salvar-a-onu,1060748 [Accessed 6 August 2014].
  • Aguilar, S. , 2012. Uma cultura brasileira de missões de paz [A Brazilian culture of peace missions]. In: C. Brigagão and F. Fernandes , eds. Diplomacia brasileira para a Paz . Brasília: FUNAG, 215–241.
  • Almeida, P.R. , 2007. Brazil as a regional player and an emerging global power. FES Briefing Paper. Available from: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/global/04709.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2016].
  • Almeida, P.W. , 2014. Brazilian view of responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect , 6, 29–63.10.1163/1875984X-00601003
  • Alsina, J.P. , 2009. O poder militar como instrumento da política externa brasileira contemporânea [Military power as an instrument of contemporary Brazilian foreign policy]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional , 52 (2), 173–191.10.1590/S0034-73292009000200010
  • Amorim, C. , 2010. Brazilian foreign policy under President Lula (2003–2010): an overview. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional , 53, 214–240.10.1590/S0034-73292010000300013
  • Amorim, C. , 2013. Brasil, um país provedor de paz [Brazil, a country provider of peace]. estudos internacionais , 1 (2), 127–137.
  • Amorim, C. , 2015. Teerã, Ramalá e Doha memórias da política externa ativa e altiva [Tehran, Ramallah and Doha memories of a active and affirmative foreign policy]. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Armijo, L. and Sotero, P. , 2007. Brazil: to be or not to be a BRIC? Asian Perspective , 31 (4), 43–70.
  • Azambuja, M.C. , 2009. A Brazilian perspective on nuclear disarmament. In: B.M. Blechman , ed. Brazil, Japan, and Turkey . Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, 5–14.
  • Battaglino, J. , 2012. The coexistence of peace and conflict in South America: toward a new conceptualization of types of peace. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional , 55 (2), 131–151.10.1590/S0034-73292012000200008
  • BBC , 2010. Brasil quer crescer e deixar de ser ‘anão militar’, diz ‘El Mundo’ [Brazil wants to grow and stop being a ‘military dwarf’ says ‘El Mundo’]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/noticias/2010/04/100408_pressdefesa_ba.shtml [Accessed 15 August 2012].
  • Bello, W. , 2005. The real meaning of Hong-Kong: Brazil and India join the big boys. Focus on the Global South . Available from: http://focusweb.org/node/795 [ Accessed 30 June 2014].
  • Bertonha, J.F. , 2010. Brazil: an emerging military power? The problem of the use of force in Brazilian international relations in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional , 53 (2), 107–124.
  • Bertonha, J.F. , 2013. A Estrategia Nacional de Defesa do Brasil e a dos BRICs em perspectiva [Brazil's National Defence Strategy and that of the BRICs in perspective]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional , 56 (2), 112–130.10.1590/S0034-73292013000200007
  • Bertonha, J.F. , 2015. Brasil: uma potência militar emergente? A questão do uso da força nas relações internacionais brasileiras [Brazil: an emerging military power? The question of the use of force in Brazilian international relations]. ADN , 102, 4–20.
  • Bosco, D. and Stuenkel, O. , 2015. The rhetoric and reality of Brazil’s mulatileralism. In: O. Stuenkel and M. Taylor , eds. Brazil on the global stage: power, ideas, and the liberal international order . New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 17–33.10.1057/9781137491657
  • Bratman, E.Z. , 2015. Brazil’s ambivalent challenge to global environmental norms. In: O. Stuenkel and M. Taylor , eds. Brazil on the global stage: power, ideas, and the liberal international order . New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 95–115.10.1057/9781137491657
  • Brazil , 2015. Ministry of foreign affairs – Republic of Iraq. Available from: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11107:republic-ofiraq&catid=155&lang=en&Itemid=478 [Accessed 29 February 2016].
  • Brimmer, E. , 2014. Is Brazil a ‘Responsible Stakeholder’ or a naysayer? The Washington Quarterly , 37 (3), 135–151.10.1080/0163660X.2014.978440
  • Bruk, B. , 2013. Attract and rule? Lessons of soft power from BRICS countries. IMR . Available from: http://imrussia.org/en/politics/439-attract-and-rule-lessons-of-soft-power-from-brics [Accessed 21 April 2016].
  • Bry, S. , 2014. South–South development cooperation and soft power. The case of Brazil’s foreign policy and technical cooperation . Thesis (PhD). DTU.
  • Burges, S. , 2013. Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers? International Affairs , 89 (3), 577–594.10.1111/inta.2013.89.issue-3
  • Burges, S. , 2014. Mistaking Brazil for a middle power. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research , 19 (2), 286–302.
  • Burges, S. and Daudelin, J. , 2011. Moving in, carving, proliferating: the many faces of Brazil’s multilateralism since 1989. Pensamiento Propio , 33 (16), 35–64.
  • Cabral, L. and Shankland, A. , 2013. Narratives of Brazil-Africa cooperation for agricultural development: new paradigms? Future Agricultures Briefings, Working Paper 51, 1–27. Brighton: Future Agricultures Consortium.
  • Cabral, L. , and Weinstock, J. , 2010. Brazilian technical cooperation for development: drivers, mechanics and future prospects. Overseas Development Institute. Available from: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/6137.pdf [Accessed 20 May 2016].
  • Calasans, W. and Maranhão, R. , 2012. Brasil pode ser potência mundial da paz, diz ex-chefe nuclear da ONU [Brazil can be a world power of peace, says former UN Head for nuclear]. R7 Notícias . Available from: http://noticias.r7.com/internacional/noticias/brasil-pode-ser-depotencia-mundial-da-paz-diz-ex-chefe-nuclear-da-onu-20120619.html [Accessed 12 May 2016].
  • Canineu, M.L. and Donahoe, E. , 2014. Brazil as global guardian of internet freedom? In: T. Lindert , and L. Troost , eds. Shifting power and human rights diplomacy . Amsterdam: Amnesty International Netherlands, 33–39.
  • Cardoso, F.H. , 2011. A soma e o resto um olhar sobre a vida aos 80 anos [The sum and the rest a view on life at 80 years old]. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
  • Casanova, L. and Kassum, J. , 2014. The political economy of an emerging global power: in search of the Brazil dream . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137352361
  • Casarões, G. , 2015. O que o Brasil tem a dizer ao mundo? Uma análise dos discursos de Dilma Rousseff [What does Brazil have to say to the world? A analysis of Dilma Rousseff's speeches]. Revista Sapientia , 25 (4), 32–42.
  • Casarões, G. , 2016. Precisamos falar sobre o Conselho de Segurança [We need to talk about the Security Council]. Estadão . Avaialable from: http://politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/gestao-politica-e-sociedade/precisamos-falar-sobre-o-conselho-de-seguranca/ [Accessed 4 July 2016].
  • Chagas, C. , 2010. MINUSTAH and the security environment in Haiti: Brazil and South American cooperation in the field. International Peacekeeping , 17 (5), 711–722.
  • Chatin, M. , 2013. Brazil: a new powerhouse without military strength? BRICS Policy Center , Working Paper, 1–25.
  • Christensen, S. , 2013. Brazil’s foreign policy priorities. Third World Quarterly , 34 (2), 271–286.10.1080/01436597.2013.775785
  • Datz, G. and Peters, J. , 2013. Brazil and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in the new century: between ambition, idealism, and pragmatism. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs , 7 (2), 43–57.10.1080/23739770.2013.11446551
  • Destradi, S. and Jakobeit, C. , 2015. Global governance debates and dilemmas: emerging powers’ perspectives and roles in global trade and climate governance. Strategic Analysis , 39 (1), 60–72.10.1080/09700161.2014.980538
  • Dias Carneiro, J. , 2015. Brasil não pode desperdiçar seu ‘soft power’, diz Celso Amorim [Brazil cannot lose its ‘soft power’, Celso Amorim says]. BBC . Available from: http://www.bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2015/03/150310_entrevista_celso_amorim_jc_rb [Accessed 16 July 2015].
  • Dirceu, Z. , 2011. Modernização das Forças Armadas [Modernisation of the Armed Forces]. Zé Dirceu . Available from: http://www.zedirceu.com.br/modernizacao-das-forcas-armadas/ [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  • Doctor, M. , 2015. Brazil’s role in institutions of global economic governance: the WTO and G20. Global Society , 29 (3), 1–15.
  • Dytz Filho, N. , 2014. Crise e reforma da UNESCO: reflexões sobre a promoção do poder brando do Brasil no plano international [Crisis and reform of UNESCO: reflection on the promotion of Brazil's soft power at the international level]. Brasília: FUNAG.
  • The Economist , 2011. The road to Rio . Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21537039 [Accessed 27 June 2014].
  • Edwards, G. and Timmons Roberts, J. , 2015. A fragmented continent: Latin America and the global politics of climate change . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Efstathopoulos, C. , 2012. Leadership in the WTO: Brazil, India and the Doha development agenda. Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 25 (2), 269–293.10.1080/09557571.2012.678294
  • Engstrom, P. , 2012. Brazilian foreign policy and human rights: change and continuity under Dilma. Critical Sociology , 38 (6), 835–849.
  • Engstrom, P. , 2014. Brazilian foreign policy and international human rights promotion: existing tensions and future prospects. In: T. Lindert , L. Troost , eds. Shifting power and human rights diplomacy . Amsterdam: Amnesty International Netherlands, 15–24.
  • Esteves, P. and Assunção, M. , 2014. South–South cooperation and the international development battlefield: between the oecd and the UN. Third World Quarterly , 35 (10), 1775–1790.10.1080/01436597.2014.971591
  • Fernández, M. and Gama, C.S. , 2016. Modernization in-between: the ambivalent role of Brazil in contemporary peacebuilding efforts in Africa. In: P. Cunliffe and K. Kenkel , eds. Brazil as a rising power . Abingdon: Routledge, 65–82.
  • Flatjord, I.M. , 2015. From poverty to power? Brazilian social policy as a soft power resource. NorLARNet . Avaialable from: http://www.norlarnet.uio.no/research-in-norway/mastertheses/flatjord.html [Accessed 18 May 2016].
  • Fonseca, G. , 2015. O Brasil e o Multilateralismo Pós 1945 [Brazil and Multilateralism Post 1945]. In: P. Tarrisse da Fontoura , M.L. Escorel de Moraes , and E. Uziel , eds. O Brasil e as Nações Unidas 70 anos . Brasília: FUNAG, 359–393.
  • Freitas, R. , 2013. Abrir embaixadas em ilhotas é ‘megalomania diplomática’ [Opening embassies in small islands is ‘diplomatic megalomania’]. O Tempo . Avaialable from: http://www.otempo.com.br/capa/pol%C3%ADtica/abrir-embaixadas-em-ilhotas-%C3%A9-megalomania-diplom%C3%A1tica-1.686045 [Accessed 4 March 2016].
  • Gandra, A. , 2014. Colocar novas instituições para funcionar é desafio do BRICS, diz diretor do FMI [Setting new institutions to function is the BRICS' challenge, says IMF Director]. Agência Brasil . Available from: http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/economia/noticia/2014-08/novas-instituicoes-fortalecem-governanca-global-do-brics-diz-diretor-do-fmi [Accessed 18 February 2015].
  • Gardini, G.L. , 2015. Brazil: what rise of what power? Bulletin of Latin American Research , 35 (1), 5–19.
  • Garwood-Gowers, A.D. , 2015. R2P ten years after the world summit: explaining ongoing contestation over pillar III. Global Responsibility to Protect , 7 (3–4), 300–324.10.1163/1875984X-00704005
  • Giraldi, R. , 2012. Presidente do Ipea diz que Brasil tem vocação natural para diplomacia e conciliação [President of IPEA says Brazil has a natural vocation for diplomacy and conciliation]. Agência Brasil . Available from: http://www.ebc.com.br/agenciabrasil/noticia/2012-09-18/presidente-do-ipea-diz-que-brasil-tem-vocacao-natural-para-diplomacia-e-conciliacao [Accessed 27 February 2015].
  • Gouvea, R. , 2015. Brazil’s new defence paradigm. Defence & Security Analysis , 31 (2), 137–151.10.1080/14751798.2015.1038452
  • Green, D. and Luehrmann, L. , 2016. Contentious politics in Brazil and China: beyond regime . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Grix, J. , Brannagan, P. , and Houlihan, B. , 2015. Interrogating states’ soft power strategies: a case study of sports mega-events in Brazil and the UK. Global Society , 29 (3), 463–479.10.1080/13600826.2015.1047743
  • Hakim, P. , 2010. O Brasil em ascensão: os desafios e as escolhas de uma potência global emergente [Brazil is ascension: the challenges and choices of an emerging global power]. Política Externa , 19 (1), 43–53.
  • Harnisch, S. , Franck, C. , and Maull, H. , 2011. Role theory in international relations: approaches and analyses . Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Herz, M. , 2010. Concepts of security in South America. International Peacekeeping , 17 (5), 598–612.10.1080/13533312.2010.516938
  • Herz, M. , 2013. Assumptions on intervention and security in South America. In: K. Kenkel , ed. South America and peace operations: coming of age . Abingdon: Routledge, 25–44.
  • Hirst, M. , 2005. The United States and Brazil, A long road of unmet expectations . New York : Routledge.
  • Hirst, M. , 2015. Emerging Brazil: the challenges of liberal peace and global governance. Global Society , 29 (3), 359–372.10.1080/13600826.2015.1008422
  • Hirst, M. and Lima, M.R. , 2006. Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities. International Affairs , 82 (1), 21–40.
  • Holsti, K.J. , 1970. National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly , 14 (3), 233–309.10.2307/3013584
  • Holsti, K.J. , 1987. National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. In: S. Walker , ed. Role theory and foreign policy analysis . Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 5–43.
  • Hopewell, K. , 2013. New protagonists in global economic governance: Brazilian agribusiness at the WTO. New Political Economy , 18, 603–623.10.1080/13563467.2013.736957
  • Hopewell, K. , 2016. Breaking the WTO: how emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Huntington, S. , 1999. The lonely superpower. Foreign Affairs , 78 (2), 35–49.10.2307/20049207
  • Hurrell, A. , 2010. Emerging powers, global order and global justice. IILJ International Legal Theory Colloquium , 1–18. Available from: http://iilj.org/courses/documents/2010Colloquium.Hurrell.pdf
  • Hurrell, A. and Sengupta, S. , 2012. Emerging powers, North–South relations and global climate politics. International Affairs , 88 (3), 463–484.10.1111/inta.2012.88.issue-3
  • IISS , 2015/2016. The military balance . Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Jesus, D.S.V. , 2010. The Brazilian way. The Non-Proliferation Review , 17 (3), 551–567.
  • Jesus, D.S.V. , 2012. In the search for autonomy: Brazil’s foreign policy on nuclear issues (1940–2011). Global Change Peace and Security , 24 (3), 365–384.10.1080/14781158.2012.716032
  • Kenkel, K. , 2012. Brazil and R2P: does taking responsibility mean using force? Global Responsibility to Protect , 4, 5–32.10.1163/187598412X619649
  • Kenkel, K. , 2013. Brazil’s peacekeeping and peacebuilding policies in Africa. Journal of International Peacekeeping , 17, 272–292.10.1163/18754112-1704006
  • Kenkel, K. and Rosa, F. , 2015. Localization and subsidiarity in Brazil’s engagement with the responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect , 7, 325–349.10.1163/1875984X-00704006
  • Kenkel, K. and Stefan, C. , 2016. Brazil and the responsibility while protecting initiative: norms and the timing of diplomatic support. Global Governance , 22, 41–58.
  • Krotz, U. , 2008. National role conceptions and foreign policies: France and Germany compared . Unpublished Manuscript.
  • Kyrousi, A. , 2014. Measuring soft power: the case of Brazil. WISC 4th Global International Studies Conference, Frankfurt, 1–27.
  • Lima, M.R.S. , 2010. Tradição e Inovação na Política Externa Brasileira [Tradition and Innovation in Brazilian Foreign Policy]. Plataforma Democrática , 3, 1–22.
  • Lima, A.P. , 2015. A ONU 70 Anos Depois e o Tema da Reforma [The UN 70 later and the topic of reform]. Revista Sapientia , 25 (4), 50–54.
  • Lins, M.A. and Silva, L. , 2011. Brazil and the G20: recent development strategy and strength among ‘New’ emerging economies. 21–30. Available from: http://www.kas.de/upload/dokumente/2011/10/G20_E-Book/chapter_3.pdf [Accessed 20 May 2016].
  • Lustig, R. , 2010. Brazil emerges as a leading exponent of soft power. BBC . Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8580560.stm [Accessed 30 June 2010].
  • Malamud, A. , 2011. A leader without followers? the growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society , 53 (3), 1–24.
  • Mantzikos, I. , 2010. The good multilateralists: Brazil and South Africa in the new area of multilateralism. Mundorama . Available from: http://www.mundorama.net/2010/05/01/the-good-multilateralists-brazil-and-south-africa-in-the-new-area-of-multilateralism-por-ioannis-mantzikos/
  • Mares, D. , 2016. Brazil: revising the status quo with soft power? In: T.V. Paul , ed. Accommodating rising powers: past, present and future . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 246–267.10.1017/CBO9781316460191
  • Marques, S.F. , 2005. A Imagem Internacional do Brasil no Governo Cardoso (1995–2002): Uma Leitura Construtiva do Conceito de Potência Media [Brazil's international image during the Cardoso government (1995–2002): a constructive reading of the middle power concept]. Thesis (MA). PUC-Rio.
  • Marsili, M. , 2015. Brazil: the carambole strategy of a rising power. Universities: Relações Internacionais , 13 (1), 63–83.
  • Marthoz, J.P. , 2010. Brazil’s emergence and the potential for the Norwegian peacebuilding diplomacy. NOREF, Working Paper. Available from: https://emergingpowerspeacebuilding.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/marthoz-brazils-emergence-andthe-potential-for-norwegian-peacebuilding-diplomacy.pdf [Accessed 18 May 2016].
  • Martín, F.E. , 2006. Militarist peace in South America conditions for war and peace . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403983589
  • Mello, F.C. , 2014. Política Externa Brasileira: contextos e objetivos da diplomacia multilateral? [Brazilian Foreign Policy: contexts and objectives of multilateral diplomacy?]. In: E. Lazarou , ed. Multilateralismo nas Relações Internacionais . Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 107–126.
  • Milani, C. , 2015. Los países emergentes en el orden mundial actual: cambios y legitimidad política [Emerging countries in the actual world order: changes and political legitimacy]. In: A. Pelfini and G. Fulquet , eds., 35–50.
  • Miyamoto, S. , 2011. A política externa do governo Lula: aspirações e dificuldades [The foreign policy of the Lula government: aspirations and difficulties]. Idéias Campinas , 3, 119–132.10.1590/S0034-73292000000100006
  • Monteiro, T. , 2011. Relatorio sigiloso da defesa comprova sucateamento do setor militar do pais [Secret report confirms dismantlement of the country's military sector]. Defesanet . Available from: http://www.defesanet.com.br/defesa/noticia/3664/Relatorio-sigiloso-da-Defesa-comprova-sucateamento-do-setor-militar-no-Pais [Accessed 19 January 2015].
  • Müller Filho, R. and Souza, J.L. , 2008. Ministro de Assuntos Estratégicos explica os projetos de longo prazo para o Brasil [Strategic Affairs Minister explains Brazil's long-term projects]. Revista Desafios do Desenvolvimento IPEA , 5 (40).
  • Muxugato, B. , 2016. El smart power y la no indiferencia como nuevos principios directores de la política exterior brasileña [Smart power and non-indifference as new driving principles of Brazilian foreign policy]. América Latina Hoy , 72, 89–101.10.14201/alh201672
  • Nadvi, K. , 2014. “Rising Powers” and labour and environmental standards. Oxford Development Studies , 42 (2), 137–150.10.1080/13600818.2014.909400
  • Narlikar, A. , 2010. New powers in the club: the challenges of global trade governance. International Affairs , 86 (3), 717–728.10.1111/inta.2010.86.issue-3
  • Narlikar, A. , Daunton, M. and Stern, R.M. , eds., 2012. The Oxford handbook on the world trade organization . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Oliveira, I.M. , 2010. A Atuação do Brasil no Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC: o Caso do Contencioso do Algodão contra os EUA [Brazil's actuation in the WTO disagreement settlement system: the contentious cotton case against the US]. IPEA , 2, 17–27.
  • Oualalou, L. , 2014. Le Brésil joue la puissance par le football [Brazil and the power play through football]. Le Figaro . Available from: http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2014/06/11/01003-20140611ARTFIG00303-le-bresil-joue-lapuissance-par-le-football.php [Accessed 8 May 2016].
  • Parsi, T. , 2012. A Single roll of the dice: Obama’s diplomacy with Iran . New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
  • Patrick, S. , 2010. Irresponsible stakeholders? The difficulty of integrating rising powers. Foreign Affairs . Avaialable from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/south-africa/2010-11-01/irresponsiblestakeholders [Accessed 25 February 2016].
  • Patti, C. , 2010. Brazil and the nuclear issues in the years of the Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva government (2003–2010). Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional , 53 (2), 178–197.10.1590/S0034-73292010000200010
  • Pinheiro, M. , 2014. Brazil assumes leadership in future of internet governance. Inter Press Service. Available from: http://www.ipsnews.net/2014/04/brazil-assumes-leadership-future-internet-governance/ [Accessed 25 June 2014].
  • Pinto, R. , 2012. Interesse por cultura brasileira cria chance de fortalecer economia via ‘soft power’ [Interest in Brazilian culture creates opportunity to strengthen economy through ‘soft power’]. BBC . Avaialable from: http://www.bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2012/04/040423_brazilian_softpower01_rp.shtml [Accessed 18 April 2016].
  • Proença, D. and Diniz, E. , 1998. Política de Defesa Nacional: uma análise crítica [National Defence Policy: a critical analysis]. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Humanidades.
  • Quéau, Y. , 2014. Are the Brazilian military industrial ambitions at risk? In: F. Dane , ed. International security: a European – South American dialogue . Rio de Janeiro: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 269–287.
  • Ramalho, A.J. , 2016. Norms and tolerance between words and deeds: Brazil’s long-term approach to global governance. In: P. Cunliffe and K. Kenkel , eds. Brazil as a rising power: Intervention norms and the contestation of global order . Abingdon: Routledge, 42–64.
  • Reid, M. , 2014. Brazil: the troubled rise of a global power . New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
  • Ricupero, R. , 2010. Brasil: potência de paz ou guerra? [Brazil: power of peace or war?] Folha de São Paulo . Available from: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/dinheiro/fi1104201006.htm [Accessed 5 May 2016].
  • Rocha Paiva, L.E. , 2012. O Presente e o Futuro da Dissuasão Brasileira [The Present and Future of Brazilian Deterrence]. In: E.B. Silva Filho and R.F. Moraes , eds. Defesa Nacional Para o Século XXI: Política Internacional, Estratégia e Tecnologia Militar . Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 317–342.
  • Rodriguez, J. , 2013. Os efeitos de limitadas capacidades materiais na política externa de pôtencias intermediárias do sistema internacional [The effects of limited material capacities on the foreign policy of the international system's intermediary powers]. Thesis (PhD). University of Lisbon.
  • Rothkopf, D. , 2012. Brazil’s new swagger. Foreign Policy . Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/28/brazils-new-swagger-2/ [Accessed 8 May 2016].
  • Rousseff, D. , 2011. The Brazilian model. The Economist . Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21537004 [Accessed 17 February 2015].
  • Ruvolo, J. , 2014. Brazil’s Constitution Of The Internet puts net neutrality in the spotlight. TechCrunch . Available from: http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/19/brazils-constitution-of-the-internet-puts-net-neutrality-in-the-spotlight/ [Accessed 16 June 2014].
  • Saidi, N. , 2014. The BRICS bank signals the end of the American financial empire and US dollar hegemony. HuffingtonPost . Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-nasser-h-saidi/thebrics-bank-signals-th_b_5604294.html [Accessed 29 February 2016].
  • Sandal, N. , 2014. Middle powerhood as a legitimation strategy in the developing world: the cases of Brazil and Turkey. International Politics , 51 (6), 693–708.10.1057/ip.2014.33
  • Santos, N.B. , 2014a. A política externa do governo Lula com relação ao conflito Israel-Palestina [The foreign policy of the Lula government in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict]. História , 33 (2), 189–216.
  • Santos, R. , 2014b. Brazil: a soft power rising with the BRICS towards a multipolar world. In: V. Lo and M. Hiscock , eds. The rise of the BRICS in the global political economy: changing paradigms? 67–83.
  • Saraiva, M. , 2014a. The Brazilian soft power tradition. Current History , 113 (760), 64–69.
  • Saraiva, M. , 2014b. Balanço da Política Externa de Dilma Rousseff: Perspectivas Futuras? [Balance of Dilma Rousseff's Foreign Policy: Future Perspectives?] Relações Internacionais , 44, 25–35.
  • Satana, N. , 2016. Multilateral interventions as a power-enhancing instrument: rising powers’ path from the periphery to the center. In: P. Cunliffe and K. Kenkel , eds. Brazil as a rising power . Abingdon: Routledge, 127–146.
  • Schor, A. and Onuki, J. , 2015. Política externa brasileira e a coalizão IBAS: comércio e inserção internacional [Brazilian foreign policy and the IBSA coalition: trade and international insertion]. In: H. Ramanzini Júnior and L.F. Ayerbe , eds. Política externa brasileira, cooperação sul-sul e negociações internacionais . São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 115–140.
  • Schweller, R. , 2011. Emerging powers in an age of disorder. Global Governance , 17, 285–297.
  • SEEP , 2012. Defesa Nacional Forte, jamais agressivo [Strong, never aggressive National Defence]. Em Discussão , 3 (10), 1–86.
  • SIPRI , 2015. SIPRI yearbook 2015 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, K. , 2015. La alternativa de los BRICS: implicancias para la gobernanza global [The alternative of the BRICS: implications for global governance]. In: A. Pelfini and G. Fulquet , eds. Los BRICS en la construcción de la multipolaridad: ¿Reforma o adaptación? . Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 19–34.
  • Soares Castro, A. , 2013. Fifa World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games: Brazil’s strategy ‘to win hearts and minds’ through sports and football. PD Magazine , pp. 28–35.
  • Souza Neto, D. , 2011. Brazil & Africa: challenges and opportunities. Africa Quarterly , 51 (3–4), 76–85.
  • Stavridis, S. , 2012. Emerging powers as obstacles to effective multilateralism: the negative impact of Brazil’s foreign policy on the rhetoric of civilian power Europe. Anuario Americanista Europeo , 10, 133–153.
  • Stephen, M.D. , 2012. Rising regional powers and international institutions: the foreign policy orientations of India. Brazil and South Africa. Global Society , 26 (3), 289–309.
  • Stolte, C. , 2012. Brazil in Africa: just Another BRICS country seeking resources? Chatham House Briefing Paper. Available from: http://www.eurodad.org/files/integration/2013/06/1112bp_brazilafrica.pdf [20 May 2016].
  • Stolte, C. , 2014. Brazil’s South–South Cooperation with Africa 2003–2013: a decade of Brazilian outreach towards its Atlantic neighbourhood. CEBRI Artigos , 2 (9), 7–21.
  • Stuenkel, O. , 2010a. Strategic international threats surrounding Brazil. KAS International Reports , 10, 103–121.
  • Stuenkel, O. , 2010b. Identidade, Status e Instituições Internacionais: O Caso do Brasil, da Índia e do Tratado de Não Proliferação [Identity, Status and International Institutions: the case of Brazil, India and the Non-Proliferation Treaty]. Contexto Internacional , 32 (2), 519–561.10.1590/S0102-85292010000200008
  • Stuenkel, O. , 2013. BRICS development bank: patience required. Post-Western World . Avaialable from: http://www.postwesternworld.com/2013/05/12/brics-development-bank-patience-required/ [Accessed 28 February 2016].
  • Stuenkel, O. , 2014. The BRICS and the future of R2P, was Syria or Libya the exception? Global Responsibility to Protect , 6, 3–28.10.1163/1875984X-00601002
  • Stuenkel, O. , 2015. The BRICS and the future of global order . Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Thakur, R. , 2014. How representative are BRICS? Third World Quarterly , 35 (10), 1791–1808.10.1080/01436597.2014.971594
  • Théry, H. , 2014. Le Brésil Pays Emergé [Brazil Emerged Country]. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Thies, C. and Nieman, M.D. , 2014. Power, status and conflict behaviour: Brazil as an emerging in the international system . Buenos Aires: FLACSO-ISA.
  • Tourinho, M. , 2015. For liberalism without hegemony: Brazil and the rule of non-intervention. In: O. Stuenkel and M. Taylor , eds. Brazil on the global stage: power, ideas, and the liberal international order . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 79–94.10.1057/9781137491657
  • Tozetto, C. , 2014. Marco Civil da web é só o primeiro passo, diz idealizador [The Marco Civil is only a first step, says creator]. Veja . Available from: http://veja.abril.com.br/noticia/vida-digital/marco-civil-da-web-e-so-o-primeiro-passo-diz-idealizador [Accessed 26 June 2014].
  • Trinkunas, H. , 2015. Brazil’s global ambitions. Brookings Institution . Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2015/02/04-brazil-global-ambitions-trinkunas [Accessed 9 June 2015].
  • TV Afiada , 2015. Mangabeira: O Brasil é um protetorado americano! Conversa Afiada [Mangabeira: Brazil is an american protectorate!]. Available from: http://www.conversaafiada.com.br/tv-afiada/2015/07/30/mangabeira-o-brasil-e-um-protetoradoamericano [Accessed 12 May 2016].
  • UN News Centre , 2013. Ban praises Brazil’s global leadership and commitment to UN ideals . Available from: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=38754#.U7GZuY3V9oA [Accessed 16 June 2014].
  • Uziel, E. , 2010. O Conselho de Segurança, as operações de manutenção da paz e a inserção do Brasil no mecanismo de segurança coletiva das Nações Unidas [The Security Council, the peacekeeping operations and Brazil's international insertion into the United Nations' collective security mechanism]. Brasilia: FUNAG.
  • Valladão, A. , 2013. Brazil, India, and China: emerging powers and warfare. In: F. Dane , ed. Brazil emerging in the global security order . Rio de Janeiro: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 90–105.
  • Valladão, A. , 2014. Brazil – defence without threat. In: F. Dane , ed. Multilateral Security Governance , 147–155.
  • Vieira, M. , 2013. IBSA at 10: South–South development assistance and the challenge to build international legitimacy in a changing global order. Strategic Analysis , 37 (3), 291–298.10.1080/09700161.2013.782630
  • Vieira, V.R. , 2015. The ‘Eastern Brother’: Brazil’s view of India as a diplomatic partner in world trade. In: K. Sullivan , ed. Competing visions of India in world politics . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–127.10.1057/9781137398666
  • Vigevani, T. and Cepaluni, G. , 2007. Lula’s foreign policy and the quest for autonomy through diversification. Third World Quarterly , 28 (7), 1309–1326.10.1080/01436590701547095
  • Vilela, E. and Neiva, P. , 2011. Temas e regiões nas políticas externas de Lula e Fernando Henrique: comparação do discurso dos dois presidentes [Themes and regions in the foreign policies of Lula and Fernando Henrique: comparison of the two presidents' speeches]. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional , 54 (2), 70–96.10.1590/S0034-73292011000200004
  • Viotti, M.L. , 2011. Statement by H.E. Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti, Permanent Representation of Brazil to the United Nations, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. Responsibility to Protect http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/brazil.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2015].
  • Vucetic, S. and Duarte, E. , 2015. New fighter aircraft acquisitions in Brazil and India: why not buy American? Politics & Policy , 43 (3), 401–425.10.1111/polp.12119
  • Wang, H. and French, E. , 2013. Middle range powers in global governance. Third World Quarterly , 34 (6), 985–999.10.1080/01436597.2013.802509
  • Wehner, L. , 2011. Roles and actions of leadership: Brazil and the South American others. In: N. Godehardt and D. Nabers , eds. Regional powers and regional orders . Abingdon: Routledge, 137–154.
  • Wish, N. , 1980. Foreign policy makers and their national role conceptions. International Studies Quarterly , 24 (4), 532–554.10.2307/2600291

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.