The seductive force of ‘noumenal power’: a new path (or impasse) for critical theory?

References

• Allen, Amy, Forst, Rainer, and Haugaard, Mark, 2014. Power and reason, justice and domination: a conversation. Journal of Political Power, 7 (1), 7–33.10.1080/2158379X.2014.887540
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S., 1971 [1962]. Two faces of power. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Baert, Patrick and da Silva, Filipe Carreira, 2010 [1998]. Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt, 1991. Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt and Tester, Keith, 2007. On the postmodernism debate. In: Pelagia Goulimari, ed. Postmodernism. What moment?, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Tom, et al., 1976. Meta-power and the structuring of social hierarchies. In: Tom Burns and Walter Frederick Buckley, eds. Power and control: social structures and their transformation. London: Sage, 215–288.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich and Lau, Christoph, 2005. Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. The British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4), 525–557.10.1111/bjos.2005.56.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix, Reinhard and Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1967. Class, status, and power: social stratification in comparative perspective. 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, Jeremy, 1971 [1843]. Of elementary political powers. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, Felix and Williams, Michael J., eds., 2007. Power in world politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Michael Abram, 2006. Justification without awareness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199275742.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Blokker, Paul and Brighenti, Andrea, 2011. Politics between justification and defiance. European Journal of Social Theory, 14 (3), 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, James, 1999. Theories, practices, and pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29 (4), 459–480.10.1177/004839319902900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, James, 2007. Democracy across borders: from Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, 1990. L’amour et la justice comme compétences. Paris: Métailié.10.3917/meta.bolta.1990.01
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, 2002. Nécessité et justification. Revue économique, 53 (2), 275–289.10.3917/reco.532.0273
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, 2009a. De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, 2009b. Autour de De la justification. Un parcours dans le domaine de la sociologie morale. In: Marc Breviglieri, Claudette Lafaye, and Danny Trom, eds. Compétences critiques et sens de la justice. Paris: Economica, 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, 2012 [1990]. Love and justice as competences, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, Honneth, Axel and Celikates, Robin, 2014 [2009]. Sociology of critique or critical theory? Luc Boltanski and Axel Honneth in conversation with Robin Celikates. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’, trans. Simon Susen. London: Anthem Press, 561–589.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, Rennes, Juliette, and Susen, Simon, 2010. La fragilité de la réalité. Entretien avec Luc Boltanski. Propos recueillis par Juliette Rennes et Simon Susen. Mouvements, 64, 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, Rennes, Juliette, and Susen, Simon, 2014 [2010]. The fragility of reality: Luc Boltanski in conversation with Juliette Rennes and Simon Susen. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’, trans. Simon Susen. London: Anthem Press, 591–610.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent, 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent, 2006 [1991]. On justification: economies of worth, trans. Catherine Porter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest, 2003. Epistemic justification: internalism vs. externalism, foundations vs. virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, 1976. Les modes de domination. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2 (2), 122–132.10.3406/arss.1976.3456
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, 1979. La distinction : Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, 1992. Language and symbolic power, ed. and introduced by John B. Thompson, trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, Craig and Susen, Simon, 2014. Austerity and its antitheses: practical negations of capitalist legitimacy. South Atlantic Quarterly, 113 (2), 217–230.10.1215/00382876-2643576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael, et al., 2000. Global ethnography: forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Tom and Buckley, Walter Frederick, eds., 1976. Power and control: social structures and their transformation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Held, David, and McGrew, Anthony, 1998. Realism vs cosmopolitanism. Review of International Studies, 24 (3), 387–398.10.1017/S0260210598003878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel, 1996. The information age: economy, society, and culture. Volume I: the rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel, 1997. The information age: economy, society, and culture. Volume II: the power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel, 1998. The information age: economy, society, and culture. Volume III: end of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Champlin, John R., ed., 1971a. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Champlin, John R., 1971b. Introduction. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, Daniel, 2013a. The natural law foundations of modern social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842511
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, Daniel, 2013b. Jürgen Habermas: modern social theory as postmetaphysical natural law. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2), 254–273.10.1177/1468795X13477294
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, Daniel and Fine, Robert, 2013. Introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Social Theory and Natural Law’. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2), 191–196.10.1177/1468795X12472533
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart, 1979. The theory of power and organization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart, 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446279267
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart and Haugaard, Mark, eds., 2009. The SAGE handbook of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corcuff, Philippe, 1998. Justification, stratégie et compassion : Apports de la sociologie des régimes d’action. Correspondances (Bulletin d’information scientifique de l’Institut de Recherche sur le Maghreb Contemporain), Tunis, 51, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Andrew W., Furlong, Paul, and Page, Edward, 1985. Power in capitalist societies: theory, explanations and cases. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallmayr, Fred R., 1992. Critical theory and reconciliation. In: Don S. Browning and Francis Schüssler Fiorenza, eds. Habermas, modernity and public theology. New York, NY: Crossroad, 119–151.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, Donatella, et al., 2006. Globalization from below: transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, Keith M., 1996. Power. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, Keith M., ed., 2011. Encyclopedia of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, Andrew, 2005. The philosophy of Habermas. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmet, Dorothy, 1971 [1954]. The concept of power. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 78–103.
   Google Scholar
• Eulriet, Irène, 2014. The civil sphere and On justification: two models of public culture. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press, 413–423.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir, Andreas, ed., 2013. Rechtfertigungsnarrative. Zur Begründung normativer Ordnung durch Erzählungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Mike and Lash, Scott, 1995. Globalization, modernity and the spatialization of social theory: an introduction. In: Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash, and Roland Robertson, eds. Global modernities. London: Sage, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Robert, 2013. Natural law and critical theory: bringing rights back in. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2), 222–238.10.1177/1468795X12472549
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2002 [1994]. Contexts of justice: political philosophy beyond liberalism and communitarianism, trans. John M.M. Farrell. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2012 [2007]. The right to justification. Elements of a constructivist theory of justice, trans. Jeffrey Flynn. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2013. Zum Begriff eines Rechtfertigungsnarrativs. In: Andreas Fahrmeir, ed. Rechtfertigungsnarrative. Zur Begründung normativer Ordnung durch Erzählungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2013 [2003]. Toleration in conflict: past and present, trans. Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2013 [2011]. Justification and critique. Towards a critical theory of politics, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2014. Justice, democracy and the right to justification: Rainer Forst in dialogue. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2015a. Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2015b. Noumenal power. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), 111–127.10.1111/jopp.2015.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, 2015c. Noumenale Macht. In: Rainer Forst, Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 58–81.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer and Günther, Klaus, eds., 2011a. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer and Günther, Klaus, 2011b. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. In: Rainer Forst and Klaus Günther, eds. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel, 1979 [1975]. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel, 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon and trans. Colin Gordon, et al. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel, 2003. Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange, trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, and Christiane Wilke. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, Walter Bryce, 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, Raymond, 1981. The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony, 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony, 1991. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin I., 1986 [1972]. Toward a theory of social power. In: Steven Lukes, ed. Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 156–202.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1970. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13 (4), 360–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1981a. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1981b. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1987 [1965/1968]. Knowledge and human interests: a general perspective. In: Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and human interests, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro. Cambridge: Polity, 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1987 [1981]. Author’s preface. In: Jürgen Habermas, The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: reason and the rationalization of society, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity, xli–xliv.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1987 [1985]. Some questions concerning the theory of power: Foucault again. In: Jürgen Habermas, The philosophical discourse of modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity, 266–293.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1988 [1963]-a. Between philosophy and science: Marxism as critique. In: Jürgen Habermas, Theory and practice, trans. John Viertel, Cambridge: Polity, 195–252.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1988 [1963]-b. Dogmatism, reason, and decision: on theory and praxis in our scientific civilization. In: Jürgen Habermas, Theory and practice, trans. John Viertel. Cambridge: Polity, 253–282.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1988 [1971]. Introduction: some difficulties in the attempt to link theory and praxis. In: Jürgen Habermas, Theory and practice, trans. John Viertel, Cambridge: Polity, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1992. Transcendence from within, transcendence in this world. In: Don S. Browning and Francis Schüssler Fiorenza, eds. Habermas, modernity and public theology. New York, NY: Crossroad, 226–250.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 2001. Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam, Ditzingen.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 2001 [1984]. Truth and society: the discursive redemption of factual claims to validity. In: Jürgen Habermas, On the pragmatics of social interaction: preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action, trans. Barbara Fultner. Cambridge: Polity, 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 2004. Freiheit und Determinismus. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 52 (6), 871–890.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, 2004 [1999]. Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Philip, 2011. Simulation and dissimulation. Journal of War and Culture Studies, 3 (3), 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Frigga, Haug, Wolfgang Fritz, and Küttler, Wolfgang, 2004. Idealtypus. In: Wolfgang Fritz Haug, ed. Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Band 6/I). Hamburg: Argument-Verlag, 622–632.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark, 1997. The constitution of power: a theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark, ed., 2002. Power: a reader. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark, 2014a. Editorial. Journal of Political Power, 7 (1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark, 2014b. Power, competition, civilization and democracy: an editorial. Journal of Political Power, 7 (2), 167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, Jonathan, 2012. Theorizing power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, Jonathan, 2014. On the social evolution of power to/over. Journal of Political Power, 7 (2), 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hearse, Phil, ed., 2007. Take the power to change the world: globalisation and the debate on power. London: Socialist Resistance Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, Barry, 1996. Discourses of power: from Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas, 1971 [1651]. Of power. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, John, 2005 [2002]. Change the world without taking power. The meaning of revolution today. New ed. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, John and Susen, Simon, 2013. Change the world by cracking capitalism? A critical encounter between John Holloway and Simon Susen. Sociological Analysis, 7 (1), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel, 1991 [1986]. The critique of power. Reflective stages in a critical social theory, trans. Kenneth Baynes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel, 2007 [2000]. Disrespect: the normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max, 1976. Traditional and critical theory. In: Paul Connerton, ed. Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 206–224.
   Google Scholar
• Iggers, Georg G., 2005 [1997]. Historiography in the twentieth century: from scientific objectivity to the postmodern challenge. New ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Jeffrey C., 1987. Power and Marxist theory: a realist view. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Michael Hviid and Marshman, Sophia, 2008. Bauman’s metaphors: the poetic imagination in sociology. Current Sociology, 56 (5), 798–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetté, Christian, 2003. Du don comme principe de justification. Montréal: Cahiers du Larepps, Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Raja and Reyes, Javier, 2007. The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4), 595–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner, Douglas, 2007. Reappraising the postmodern: novelties, mapping and historical narratives. In: Pelagia Goulimari, ed. Postmodernism. What moment? Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press, 102–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kompridis, Nikolas, 2005. Rethinking critical theory. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13 (3), 299–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, 1990. Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21 (1), 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux, Cyril, 2014. The moral idealism of ordinary people as a sociological challenge: reflections on the French reception of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s On justification. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press, 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Stephen T., 1990. Critical theory in political practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livet, Pierre, 2009. Régimes de justification, émotions et révisions. In: Marc Breviglieri, Claudette Lafaye, and Danny Trom, eds. Compétences critiques et sens de la justice. Paris: Economica, 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, 1974. Power: a radical view. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, ed., 1986a. Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, 1986b. Introduction. In: Steven Lukes, ed. Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, 2005 [1974]. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven, 2007. Power and the battle for hearts and minds: on the bluntness of soft power. In: Felix Berenskoetter and Michael J. Williams, eds. Power in world politics. London: Routledge, 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Iain, 1999. Power. In: Fidelma Ashe, et al, eds. Contemporary social and political theory: an introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press, 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., 1971 [1966]. The power of power. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 167–185.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Roderick, 1977. The sociology of power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl, 1972 [1852]. Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte. In: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Ausgewählte Schriften in zwei Bänden (Band 1). Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 226–316.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, Kevin, 2014. Evidentialism and epistemic justification. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, Charles A., 1971 [1966]. Power and influence. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• McLennan, Gregor, 2017. Review article: The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences by Simon Susen, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4 (1), 100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mendieta y Nuñez, Lucio, 1969. Sociología del poder. México D.F.: UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Merle, Jean-Christophe, ed., 2013. Spheres of global justice, 2 Vols. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David and Walzer, Michael, eds., 1995. Pluralism, justice, and equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Peter, 1987. Domination and power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, Hans J., 1971 [1958]. Power as a political concept. In: John R. Champlin, ed. Power. New York, NY: Atherton Press, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, Peter, 2002 [1987]. Power: a philosophical analysis. 2nd ed. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulinari, Diana and Sandell, Kerstin, 2009. A feminist re-reading of theories of late modernity: Beck, Giddens and the location of gender. Critical Sociology, 35 (4), 493–508.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Doohm, Stefan, 2000. Kritik in kritischen Theorien. Oder: Wie kritisches Denken selber zu rechtfertigen sei. In: Stefan Müller-Doohm, ed. Das Interesse der Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit ‘Erkenntnis und Interesse’. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 71–106.
   Google Scholar
• Nachi, Mohamed, 2006. Rendre justice au sens de la justice. Des théories de la justice à l’exploration pragmatique du juste. In: Marc Briviglieri, Claudette Lafaye, and Danny Trom, eds. Compétences critiques et sens de la justice. Colloque de Cerisy. Paris: Economica, 399–411.
   Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, William, 2016. Remarks on Simon Susen’s The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29 (4), 423–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggi, Gianfranco, 2001. Forms of power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Steven L., 2006. Restoring the foundations of epistemic justification: a direct realist and conceptualist theory of foundationalism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, Nicos, 1980 [1978]. State, power, socialism, trans. Patrick Camiller. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Power, Michael K., 1998. Habermas and the counterfactual imagination. In: Michel Rosenfeld and Andrew Arato, eds. Habermas on law and democracy: critical exchanges. Berkeley: University of California Press, 207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Quicke, John, 1999. The postmodern turn: problems and possibilities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20 (2), 281–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John, 1999 [1971]. A theory of justice. Revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricœur, Paul, 1995. La place du politique dans un conception pluraliste de justice. In: Joëlle Affichar and Jean-Baptiste de Foucauld, eds. Pluralisme et équité : Penser la justice dans la democratie. Paris: Esprit, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. Michael, 2016. The conceptual articulation of the reality of life: Max Weber’s theoretical constitution of sociological ideal types. Journal of Classical Sociology, 16 (1), 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, Christian, 1990. Le champ de bataille post-moderne, néo-moderne. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand, 1986 [1938]. The forms of power. In: Steven Lukes, ed. Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, Martin, 2010. Power and critique. Journal of Power, 3 (1), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, John, 1996. Stratification and power: structures of class, status and command. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, John, 2001. Power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Silber, Ilana F., 2011. Emotions as regime of justification? The case of civic anger. European Journal of Social Theory, 14 (3), 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg, 1986 [1950]. Domination and freedom. In: Steven Lukes, ed. Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, David, 2009. The sense of dissonance. Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Angus, 2001. Theories of power and domination: the politics of empowerment in late modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2007. The foundations of the social: between critical theory and reflexive sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2008a. Poder y anti-poder (I-III). Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural, 10 (1), 49–90.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2008b. Poder y anti-poder (IV-V). Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural, 10 (2), 133–180.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2009a. Between emancipation and domination: Habermasian reflections on the empowerment and disempowerment of the human subject. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 20, 80–110.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2009b. The philosophical significance of binary categories in Habermas’s discourse ethics. Sociological Analysis, 3 (2), 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2010a. Los movimientos sociales en las sociedades complejas. In: Celia Basconzuelo, Teresita Morel, and Simon Susen, eds. Ciudadanía territorial y movimientos sociales. Historia y nuevas problemáticas en el escenario latinoamericano y mundial. Río Cuarto: Ediciones del ICALA, 149–226.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2010b. The transformation of citizenship in complex societies. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10 (3), 259–285.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2010c. Remarks on the concept of critique in Habermasian thought. Journal of Global Ethics, 6 (2), 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2010d. Meadian reflections on the existential ambivalence of human selfhood. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 17, 62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2011. Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie or kritische Gesellschaftspraxis? Robin Celikates, Kritik als soziale Praxis. Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie (Frankfurt am Main, Campus Verlag, 2009). Archives Européennes de Sociologie / European Journal of Sociology, 52 (3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2012a. ‘Open Marxism’ against and beyond the ‘Great Enclosure’? Reflections on how (not) to crack capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12 (2), 281–331.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2012b. Une sociologie pragmatique de la critique est-elle possible? Quelques réflexions sur De la critique de Luc Boltanski. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 110 (4), 685–728.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2013a. Comments on Patrick Baert and Filipe Carreira da Silva’s Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond – towards a ‘hermeneutics-inspired pragmatism’? Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14 (1), 80–101.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2013b. Bourdieusian reflections on language: unavoidable conditions of the real speech situation. Social Epistemology, 27 (3–4), 199–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2013c. A reply to my critics: the critical spirit of Bourdieusian language. Social Epistemology, 27 (3–4), 323–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014a. Reflections on ideology: lessons from Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Thesis Eleven, 124 (1), 90–113.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014b. 15 theses on power. Philosophy and Society, 25 (3), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014c. The place of space in social and cultural theory. In: Anthony Elliott, ed. Routledge handbook of social and cultural theory. London: Routledge, 333–357.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014d. Luc Boltanski and his critics: an afterword. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press, 613–801.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014 [2012]. Is there such a thing as a ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’? Reflections on Luc Boltanski’s On critique. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’, trans. Simon Susen. London: Anthem Press, 173–210.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2014 [2015]. Towards a dialogue between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘critical sociology’ and Luc Boltanski’s ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’, trans. Simon Susen. London: Anthem Press, 313–348.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2015a. The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2015b. Emancipation. In: Michael T. Gibbons, et al., eds. The encyclopedia of political thought, Vol. 3. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 1024–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2015c. Une réconciliation entre Pierre Bourdieu et Luc Boltanski est-elle possible ? Pour un dialogue entre la sociologie critique et la sociologie pragmatique de la critique. In: Bruno Frère, ed. Le tournant de la théorie critique. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 151–186.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2016a. Towards a critical sociology of dominant ideologies: an unexpected reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Cultural Sociology, 10 (2), 195–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2016b. Further reflections on the ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences: a reply to William Outhwaite. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29 (4), 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2016c. Scattered remarks on the concept of engagement: a socio-philosophical approach. Philosophy and Society, 27 (2), 459–463.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2016d. Reconstructing the self: a Goffmanian perspective. In: Harry F. Dahms and Eric R. Lybeck, eds. Reconstructing social theory, history and practice, book series: Current perspectives in social theory, Vol. 35. Emerald: Bingley, 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2017a. No exit from Brexit? In: William Outhwaite, ed. Brexit: sociological responses. London: Anthem Press, 153–182.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2017b. Following the footprints of the ‘postmodern turn’: a reply to Gregor McLennan. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4 (1), 104–123.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2017c. Between crisis and critique: the fragile foundations of social life à la Rodrigo Cordero. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 18 (1), 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2017d. Remarks on the nature of justification: a socio-pragmatic perspective. In: Charlotte Cloutier, Jean-Pascal Gond, and Bernard Leca, eds. Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: contributions from French pragmatist sociology, book series: Research in the sociology of organizations, Vol. 52. Emerald: Bingley, 349–381.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon, 2018. Jürgen Habermas: between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracy. In: Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, eds. The Routledge handbook of language and politics. London: Routledge, 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon and Baert, Patrick, 2017. The sociology of intellectuals: after ‘The existentialist moment’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon and Turner, Bryan S., eds., 2011. The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: critical essays. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, Simon and Turner, Bryan S., eds., 2014. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, Chris, 2013. Natural law, state formation and the foundations of social theory. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2), 197–221.
   Google Scholar
• Toews, David, 2003. The new Tarde: sociology after the end of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 20 (5), 81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Bryan S., 2013. Alasdair MacIntyre on morality, community and natural law. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2), 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Bryan S., 2014. Three theories of justice: preliminary reflections. In: Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, eds. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press, 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vaisey, Stephen, 2009. Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114 (6), 1675–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raaij, W. Fred, 1993. Postmodern consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14 (3), 541–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco, Juan Carlos, 2003. Para leer a Habermas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Peter, 1999. After Justification: repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2 (3), 341–357.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael, 1983. Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Oxford: Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max, 1978 [1922]. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max, 1980 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, Vol. 5. Auflage: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, Adrian, 2010. Naturphilosophie Redivivus: on Bruno Latour’s ‘political ecology’. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 6 (1), 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, Sheldon S., 1988. On the theory and practice of power. In: Jonathan Arac, ed. After Foucault: humanistic knowledge, postmodern challenges. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, Dennis Hume, 1995 [1979]. Power: its forms, bases, and uses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar