Authority as epistemic capital

References

• Ahrne, G. and Brunsson, N., 2008. Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., 2010. The nominalist turn in theorizing power. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13, 403–417. doi:10.1177/1367549410377579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., 2016. The synchronization of national policies: ethnography of the global tribe of moderns. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. and Qadir, A., 2014. Epistemic governance: an approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1, 67–84. doi:10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P. and Qadir, A., 2016. Imageries of the social world in epistemic governance. International Sociology, 31, 633–652. doi:10.1177/0268580916662386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., Rautalin, M., and Syväterä, J., 2016. Organisations as epistemic capital: the case of independent children’s rights institutions. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29, 57–71. doi:10.1007/s10767-015-9205-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J.C., 2010. The celebrity-icon. Cultural Sociology, 4, 323–336. doi:10.1177/1749975510380316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R., 1933. What is technocracy? New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On violence. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Aronczyk, M., 2013. Branding the nation: the global business of national identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, Z., 2016. Vernacularization of liberal civil society by transnational Islamist NGO networks. Global Networks, 16, 391–411. doi:10.1111/glob.2016.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant, D.D., Finnemore, M., and Sell, S.K., 2010. Who governs the globe?. In: D.D. Avant, M. Finnemore and S.K. Sell, eds. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 28, 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C., 1997. Ritual: perspectives and dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E. and Taylor, S., 2016. Vernacular mourning and corporate memorialization in framing the death of Steve jobs. Organization, 23, 114–132. doi:10.1177/1350508415605109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W.L. and Segerberg, A., 2012. The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bislev, S., et al., 2002. The global diffusion of managerialism: transnational discourse communities at work. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 16, 199. doi:10.1080/09537320220132929
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M., 1989. Ritual, history and power: selected papers in anthropology. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blood, R., 2004. Should NGOs be viewed as ‘political corporations’? Journal of Communication Management, 9, 120–133. doi:10.1108/13632540510621353
   Google Scholar
• Boli, J. and Thomas, G.M., 1999. Constructing world culture: international nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1989. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14–25. doi:10.2307/202060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1991. Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 2000. Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. and Nice, R., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E.G., Pirzadeh, A., and Popescu, D., 2011. Institutional learning and knowledge transfer across epistemic communities: new tools of global governance. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 2011. A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D., 2006. Social Theory’s Methodological Nationalism: myth and Reality. European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 5–22. doi:10.1177/1368431006060460
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D., 2008. Classical sociology and the Nation-State. Journal of Classical Sociology, 8, 27–43. doi:10.1177/1468795X07084693
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 1976. Power, theorizing, and Nihilism. Theory & Society, 3, 65–87. doi:10.1007/BF00158480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., 2013. The power of expertise? Politician–bureaucrat interactions, national budget transparency and the Israeli health care policy. Policy Studies, 34, 638–654. doi:10.1080/01442872.2013.804174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.A., 1997. Authority, power, leadership: sociological understandings. New Theology Review, 10, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S., 1963. Comment on “on the concept of influence”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 63–82. doi:10.1086/267149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1958. A critique of the ruling elite model. The American Political Science Review, 52, 463–469. doi:10.2307/1952327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jouvenel, B., 1993. On power: the natural history of its growth. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D., Croft, R., and Pich, C., 2015. Toward a conceptual framework of emotional relationship marketing: an examination of two UK political parties. Journal of Political Marketing, 14, 19–34. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.990849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J., 2008. The ethics of realism. In: C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, eds. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2006. Three-dimensional power: a discussion of steven Lukes’ power: a radical view. Political Studies Review, 4, 136–145. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000100.x
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2011. Community power debate. In: K.M. Dowding, ed. Encyclopedia of power. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317. doi:10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 1993. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2003. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. The history of sexuality vol. 1. An introduction. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2003. Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds. The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. In: H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, eds. Michel foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M., 1992a. Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International Organization, 46, 187–224. doi:10.1017/S002081830000148X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M., 1992b. Introduction: epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46, 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas Jr, 1984a. The theory of communicative action, volume 1: reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas Jr, 1984b. The theory of communicative action, volume 2: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilhorst, D., 2003. The real world of NGOs: discourses, diversity and development. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Hironaka, A., 2016. Tokens of power: rethinking war. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, F., 1953. Community power structure; a study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inda, J.X., 2005. Analytics of the modern: an introduction. In: J.X. Inda, ed. Anthropologies of modernity: foucault, governmentality, and life politics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1990. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, M., 2001. Luokiteltu sukupuoli [Classified Gender]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, C., et al., 2007. Celebrity status. Sociological Theory, 25, 347–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusch, M., 1991. Foucault’s Strata and fields: an investigation into archaeological and genealogical science studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kylander, N. and Stone, C. (2012) The role of brand in the nonprofit sector. Stanford social innovation review. Available from: http://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_role_of_brand_in_the_nonprofit_sector [Accessed 18 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. Second. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1986. The sources of social power volume 1: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1993. The sources of social power volume 2: the rise of classes and nation-states, 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2012a. The sources of social power: volume 3, global empires and revolution, 1890-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2012b. The sources of social power. Volume 4: globalizations, 1945-2011. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., et al., 1997. World society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181. doi:10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., 2010. World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Bromley, P., 2013. The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological Theory, 31, 366–389. doi:10.1177/0735275113513264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Jepperson, R.L., 2000. The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18, 100. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H.T. and Fox, C.J., 2001. The epistemic community. Administration & Society, 32, 668–685. doi:10.1177/00953990122019613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W., 1956. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1963a. On the Concept of Influence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 37–62. doi:10.1086/267148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1963b. On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American philosophical society, 107, 232–262.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., 1968. What is legal logic? Israel Law Review, 3, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., 1982. The realm of rhetoric. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., 1984. On legal systems. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 7, 301–305. doi:10.1016/0140-1750(84)90002-2
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N.W., 1960. How to study community power: the pluralist alternative. The Journal of Politics, 22, 474–484. doi:10.2307/2126892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. and Wetherell, M., 1987. Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London; Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D., 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R.Y., 1993. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I.A., 2013. Charismatic performance: A study of Bacon’s rebellion. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1, 254–287. doi:10.1057/ajcs.2013.2
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I.A., 2017. Chains of power and their representation. Sociological Theory, 35, 87–117. doi:10.1177/0735275117709296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek, C., 2012. Fame attack: the inflation of celebrity and its consequences. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 1992. Governing the enterprising self. In: P. Heelas and P. Morris, eds. The values of the enterprise culture: the moral debate. London: Routledge, 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N.S., 1999. Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., and Savigny, E., 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schnable, A., 2016. Amateurs without borders: the projects of anti-professional INGOs. In: The future of world society theory: World Society Mini- Conference, August 2016, University of Washington, Seattle. Available from: https://evans.uw.edu/about/news/future-world-society-theory-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenger, D., Straub, T., and Borzillo, S., 2014. Non-governmental organizations: strategic management for a competitive world. Journal of Business Strategy, 35, 11–19. doi:10.1108/JBS-11-2013-0105
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 2014. Institutions and organizations: ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., 2016a. ‘The fable of the Bs’: between substantialism and deep relational thinking about power. Journal of Political Power, 9, 183–205. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1191163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selg, P., 2016b. Two Faces of the “Relational Turn”. PS, Political Science & Politics, 49, 27–31. doi:10.1017/S1049096515001195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E., 1965. Charisma, order, and status. American Sociological Review, 30, 199–213. doi:10.2307/2091564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., 2000. Culture and charisma: outline of a theory. Acta Sociologica (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 43, 101–111. doi:10.1177/000169930004300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2001. Think tanks, global lesson-drawing and networking social policy ideas. Global Social Policy, 1, 338–360. doi:10.1177/146801810100100304
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2002. Introduction: global knowledge and advocacy networks. Global Networks, 2, 1–12. doi:10.1111/glob.2002.2.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2004. Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2008. Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 19–38. doi:10.1111/psj.2008.36.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelenyi, I., 2016. Weber’s theory of domination and post-communist capitalisms. Theory & Society, 45, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11186-015-9263-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, P, 2004. Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W.I. and Thomas, D.S.T., 1928. The Child in America; Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: A. A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Timm Knudsen, B. and Waade, A.M., 2010. Re-investing authenticity: tourism, place and emotions. Buffalo: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., 1999. New theories of discourse: laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K., 2016. Cool nations: media and the social imaginary of the branded country. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T.A., 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249–283. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Vestergaard, A., 2008. Humanitarian branding and the media: the case of amnesty international. Journal of Language and Politics, 7, 471–493. doi:10.1075/jlp.7.3.07ves
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, T., 2003. We all want to change the world: rock and politics from Elvis to Eminem. Lanham, Md.: Taylor Trade Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M., 1987. Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C.M., 2011. A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 349–360. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., Yates, S., and Taylor, S., 2001. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Corbett, J., and Flinders, M., 2016. Just like us: everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 581–598. doi:10.1177/1369148116632182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D.H. and Pollner, M., 1971. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In: J.D. Douglas, ed. Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 80–103.
   Google Scholar