Non-voting young people in conflict with the political system

References

• Almlund, P., 2013. The unequal power relation in the final interpretation. Qualitative Studies, 4 (1), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Almlund, P. and Andersen, N.B., 2017. Lokaldemokrati på spil. Et casestudie af et dansk kommunalvalg. København: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J., 2011. Politisk interesse og selvtillid – fordelt på generationer. In: DUF and Valgretskommissionen, ed. Demokrati for fremtiden. Valgretskommissionens betænkning om unges demokratiske engagement. København: Valgretskommissionen c/o DUF.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., et al., 2014a. Hvem stemte og hvem blev hjemme? Valgdeltagelsen ved kommunalvalget 19. november 2013. Beskrivende analyse af valgdeltagelsen baseret på registerdata. Center for Valg og Partier, Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet. CVAP Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., et al., 2014b. Kan man øge valgdeltagelsen? Analyse af mobiliseringstiltag ved kommunalvalget den 19. november 2013. Center for Valg og Partier, Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet. CVAP Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• KORA and Bhatti, Y., 2017. Potentialeberegninger for valgdeltagelsen ved kommunalvalget i 2017. København: Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y. and Hansen, K.M., 2012. Leaving the nest and the social act of voting: turnout among first-time voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22 (4), 380–406. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.721375
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and Passeron J.-C., 1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London, UK: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1991. Language & Symbolic Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1997. Af praktiske grunde. Omkring teorien om menneskelig handlen. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1998. Om TV – og journalistikkens magt. København: Samlerens bogklub.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 2007. Den praktiske sans. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S., 2005. Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 157–181. doi:10.1080/10720530590914789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W.E., 1974. Democracy, pluralism and political theory. New York, NY: Routledge Innovators in Political Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A. and Green, D.P., 2015. Is voting habit forming? New evidence from experiments and regression discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science, 60 (4), 1044–1062. doi:10.1111/ajps.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1991. Review: A Rejoinder: democracy and its critics. The Journal of Politics, 53 (1), 226–231. doi:10.2307/2131732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1998. On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., 2003. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Second ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1991. Rationalitet og magt. bind 1: det konkretes videnskab. København: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1999. Socrates didn’t like the case method. why should you?. Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies, 4, 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2004. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Department of Development and Planning. Ålborg: UNI.PRINT, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Folkeskoleloven, 2017. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=192527 [Acessed 9th October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W.B., 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 56. Wiley on behalf of Aristotelian Society, 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D.P. and Gerber, A.S., 2001. Getting Out the Youth Vote: Results from Randomized Field Experiments. A report prepared for the pew charitable trusts as part of an evaluation of the 2000 election efforts of the youth vote coalition. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D.P., Gerber, A.S., and Nickerson, D.W., 2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. The Journal of Politics, 65 (4), 1083–1096. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 2006. Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426. doi:10.1111/comt.2006.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkier, B., 2009. Fokusgrupper. 2nd ed. København: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.T., 2013. Available from: http://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2017-11-19-47000-gjorde-det-sidste-gang-det-betyder-en-blank-stemme-til-valget
   Google Scholar
• Harrits, G.S., 2011. Political power as symbolic capital and symbolic violence. Journal of Political Power. 4 (2), 237–258. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2011.589178
   Google Scholar
• Harrits, G.S., 2013. Class, culture and politics: on the relevance of a bourdieusian concept of class in political sociology. The Sociological Review, 61 (1), 172–202. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KORA and Hjelmar, U. and Hansen, S.W., 2013. Lokalpolitik og borgere. Resultater fra en borgerundersøgelse om deltagelse, kendskab, holdninger og ønsker til lokaldemokratiet. København: Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, J. and Klastrup, L., 2011. Unge, sociale medier og politik. In: DUF and Valgretskommissionen, ed. Demokrati for fremtiden. Valgretskommissionens betænkning om unges demokratiske engagement. København: Valgretskommissionen c/o DUF.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, A., 2016. Millennials now rival boomers as a political force, but will they actually vote? NPR Politics Newsletter, 16 May, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, G. and Nassehi, A., 1997. Niklas Luhmann – introduktion til teorien om sociale systemer. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, L., 2013. Available from: https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/valg/kv13/valgforsker-forudser-mange-blanke-stemmer
   Google Scholar
• Koch, C., 2011. De svarer ikke. Fordummende uskikke i den politiske debat. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., 1997. Interview. En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., 2002. Dialogue as oppression and interview research. In: Nyhedsbrevet.Vol. 32. Center for Kvalitativ metodeudvikling, Psykologisk Institut, Århus Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Levinsen, K., 2011. Politiske temaer, der optager de unge. In: DUF and Valgretskommissionen, ed. Demokrati for fremtiden. Valgretskommissionens betænkning om unges demokratiske engagement. København: Valgretskommissionen c/o DUF.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1989. Ecological Communication. Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1995. Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 2000. Sociale systemer. Grundrids til en almen teori. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 2002. Massemediernes realitet. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 2007. Niklas Luhmann. Indføring i systemteorien. København: Unge Pædagoger.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A.B., and Willig, I., 2009. Om forskningsprojektet: En nyhedsuge I Danmark 1999-2008. In:  A.B. Lund, I. Willig and M. Blach-Ørsten, eds. Hvor kommer nyhederne fra? Den journalistiske fødekæde i Danmark før og nu,. Århus: Forlaget Ajour.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen Hansen, V., 2017. Available from: https://www.dr.dk/ligetil/hvor-mange-stemmer-blankt-i-din-kommune
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L., 2010. Reconsidering the role of interaction in analyzing and reporting focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 20 (5), 718–722. doi:10.1177/1049732310364627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagda, B.R.A., Mccoy, M.L., and Barrett, M.H., 2006. Mix it up: crossing social boundaries as a pathway to youth civic engagement. National Civic Review, 95, 47–56. Spring. doi:10.1002/ncr.128
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D.W., 2006. Volunteer phone calls can increase turnout. Evidence from eight field experiments. American Politics Research, 34 (3), 271–292. doi:10.1177/1532673X05275923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D.W., 2007a. Does email boost turnout? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 369–379. doi:10.1561/100.00007032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D.W., 2007b. Quality is job one: professional and volunteer voter mobilization calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (2), 269–282. doi:10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T., 2013. Available from: http://nyheder.tv2.dk/2013-11-21-s%C3%A5-mange-stemte-blankt-til-valget [Accessed 16th February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2008. Counter-democracy: politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, R.F., 2004. The promise of youth is in the present. National Civic Review. Spring. doi:10.1002/ncr.128
   Google Scholar
• Stinebrickner, B., 2015. Robert A. Dahl and the essentials of modern political analysis: politics, influence, power and polyarchy. Journal of Political Power, 8 (2), 189–207. Robert A. Dahl: an unended quest. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2015.1054579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tække, J., 2008. Krisekommunikation og konfliktsystemer. In: J. Tække and M. Paulsen, eds. Luhmann og organisation. København: Forlaget UP – Unge Pædagoger.
   Google Scholar
• Thyrring, M., 2013. Op af sofaen – anbefalinger til lokaldemokratiet. København: Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• TNS Gallup, 2012. Valgretsalderen og demokratiske værdier, december 2012. Rapport for unge 16-25 år. København: TNS Gallup for DUF – Dansk Ungdoms Fællesråd.
   Google Scholar
• Valgretskommissionen, 2011. Demokrati for fremtiden. Valgretskommissionens betænkning om unges demokratiske engagement. Dansk Ungdoms Fællesråd and Valgretskommissionen.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T., 2006. “Make them pay attention to us”: young voters and the 2004 election. National Civic Review, 95, 26–33. doi:10.1002/ncr.128
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research. design and methods. 3rd ed.Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. California, USA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar