Noumenal power revisited: reply to critics

References

• Allen, A., 2014. The power of justification. In: R. Forst. Justice, democracy and the right to justification: Rainer Forst in dialogue. London: Bloomsbury, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., Forst, R., and Haugaard, M., 2014. Power and reason, justice and domination. A conversation. Journal of Political Power, 7 (1), 7–33. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.887540
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1972. Lying in politics. In: Crises of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., [1951] 2017. The origins of totalitarianism. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Azmanova, A., 2012. The scandal of reason. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azmanova, A., 2018. Relational, structural and systemic forms of power: the ‘right to justification’ confronting three types of domination. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 68–78. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L., 2006. On justification. Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J., 2009. The politics of persons: individual autonomy and socio-historical selves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N., Hammond, M., and Min, J.B., forthcoming. Power in deliberative democracy: norms, forums, systems. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., 1980. Actions, reasons, and causes. In: Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir, A., ed. 2013. Rechtfertigungsnarrative. Zur Begründung normativer Ordnung durch Erzählungen. Normative orders, Vol. 7. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2002. Contexts of justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2012. The right to justification. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2013. Toleration in conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2014a. Justification and critique. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2014b. Justice, democracy and the right to justification: Rainer Forst in dialogue. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2014c. Justifying justification. Reply to my critics. In: Justice, democracy and the right to justification: Rainer Forst in dialogue. London: Bloomsbury, 169–216.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2014d. Two pictures of justice. In: Justification and critique. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2015. Noumenal power. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2016. The justification of basic rights: A discourse-theoretical approach. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45, 7–28. doi:10.5553/NJLP/221307132016045003002
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2017a. Noumenal alienation. Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the dialectics of self-determination. Kantian Review, 22 (4), 523–551. doi:10.1017/S1369415417000267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2017b. Normativity and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. and Günther, K., 2011. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Zur Idee eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms. In: R. Forst and K. Günther, eds. Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. and Günther, K., 2017. Normative crisis: conceptual and diagnostic remarks. Unpublished manuscript. Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2001. The subject and power. In: J. Faubion, ed. Power: essential works of Foucault. New York, NY: New Press, 326–348.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., 2012. From global poverty to global equality: a philosophical exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., 2018. A broad definition of agential power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 79–92. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., forthcoming. Human dignity and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A., 2000. Hegemony, relations of force, historical bloc. In: D. Forgacs, ed. The Gramsci reader: selected writings, 1916-1935. New York, NY: New York University Press, 189–221.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., [1976] 1983. Hannah arendt: on the concept of power. In: Philosophical-political profiles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S., 2012. Resisting reality: social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 1997. The constitution of power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1), 87–113. doi:10.1177/1368431003006001562
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018. Justification and the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. and Kettner, M., 2018. Special issue on noumenal power: an editorial. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1434923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. and Lukes, S., 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: a dialogue. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17540290801943364
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C.R., 2000. De-facing power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C.R., 2018. On structural power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmann, G., ed. 2013. Justice and peace. Interdisciplinary perspectives on a contested relationship. Normative orders, Vol. 10. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R. and Kadelbach, S., eds. 2016. Law beyond the state. pasts and futures. Normative orders, Vol. 18. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, R., forthcoming. Critique of forms of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, M., 1999. Neue Perspektiven der Diskursethik. In: A. Grunwald and S. Saupe, eds. Ethik technischen Handelns. Praktische Relevanz und Legitimation. Heidelberg: Springer, 153–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, M., 2006. Discourse ethics: Apel, Habermas, and beyond. In: C. Reimann-Sutter, M. Düwell, and D. Miet, eds. Bioethics in cultural contexts. Reflections of methods and finitude. Berlin: Springer, 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, M., 2016. Der Raum der Gründe und die Kommunikationsgemeinschaft der Begründer. Deutsches Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 8, 637–655.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, M., 2018. The Forstian bargain. Journal of Political Power, 11 (2), 139–150. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1479039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompridis, N., 2006. Critique and disclosure: critical theory between past and future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. Revised 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2018. Noumenal power: concept and explanation. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 46–55. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz-Bachmann, M., ed. 2015. Postsäkularismus. Zur Diskussion eines umstrittenen Begriffs. Normative orders, Vol. 12. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A., 1988. Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niesen, P., ed. 2012. Transnationale Gerechtigkeit und Demokratie. Normative orders, Vol. 6. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W., 1992. A theory of structure: duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29. doi:10.1086/229967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbeck, J., 1987. The grapes of wrath. Second reprint. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S., 2018. The seductive force of ‘noumenal power’: a new path (or impasse) for critical theory? Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 4–45. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1362734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2011. Responsibility for justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar