Political power and magic

References

• Adebanwi, W., 2014. Yoruba elites and ethnic politics in Nigeria: Obafemi Awolowo and corporate agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anglo, S., 2005. Machiavelli,the first century: studies in enthusiasm, hostility and irrelevance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Condren, C., and Fitzmaurice, A., 2009. Shakespeare and early modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baehr, P., 2008. Caesarism, Charisma and Fate: historical sources and modern resonances in the work of Max Weber. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, P., 1997. Reversing history: time, fortune, and the doubling of sovereignty in Macbeth. European Journal of English Studies, 1 (3), 367–387. doi:10.1080/13825579708574397
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, N., 1990. Introduction: The Tragedy of Macbeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Davies, D., 1983. The mercurian monarch: magical politics from Spenser to Pope. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 1985. This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine: The Tempest and the discourse of colonialism. In: J. Dollimore and A. Sinfield, eds. Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 48–71.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, E., 2008. The work of the devil? Theatre, the supernatural, and Montaigne’s public stage. Renaissance Studies, 22, 705–722. doi:10.1111/rest.2008.22.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., 2015. Tis new to thee’: power, magic and early science in Shakespeare’s Tempest. The Ben Jonson Journal, 22 (1), 1–22. doi:10.3366/bjj.2015.0119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavell, S., 2003 fp 1987 Macbeth Appalled. In: Disowning knowledge in seven plays of Shakespeare, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–250.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., 1997. Thinking with demons: the idea of witchcraft in early modern Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coby, P., 1983. Politics and the poetic ideal in Shakespeare’s The Tempest. Political Theory, 11 (2), 215–243. doi:10.1177/0090591783011002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crais, C., 2002. Magic, state power and the political imagination in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., 1994. Putting women in their place: the carnival at Greenham Common. Antipode, 26 (1), 35–58. doi:10.1111/anti.1994.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, M., 2016. Magic and politics. American Thinker, http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/magic_and_politics.html accessed Sept 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Dewar-Watson, S., 2004. Shakespeare and ~Aristotle. Literature Compass, 1, 1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2004.87.x
   Google Scholar
• Dollimore, J. and Sinfield, A., 1985. Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. and Haar, G., 2004. Worlds of power: religious thought and political practice in Africa. London: C. Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, W.R., 1997. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida. Journal of the History of Ideas, 58 (2), 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, A. and Frazer, E., 2010. Fictions of sovereignty: Shakespeare, theatre and the representation of rule. Parliamentary Affairs, 64, 233–247. doi:10.1093/pa/gsq035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer, E., 2016. Shakespeare’s Politics. Review of Politics, 78, 503–522. doi:10.1017/S0034670516000553
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, E. and Hutchings, K., 2014. Feminism and the critique of violence: negotiating feminist political agency. Journal of Political Ideologies, 143–163. doi:10.1080/13569317.2014.909263
   Google Scholar
• Galli, G., 2012. La Magia e il Potere. 1st edn 2004. Torino: Lindau s.r.l.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, H., 2000. Shakespeare’s links to Machiavelli and Montaigne: constructing intellectual modernity in early modern Europe. Comparative Literature, 52, 119–142. doi:10.1215/-52-2-119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, D., 2012. Can’t Stop Believing: magic and politics. The Baffler, 21, doi: 10.1162/BFLR_a_00090.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S., 1988a. Shakespeare and the exorcists. In: Shakespearean negotiations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 94–128.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S., 1988b. Shakespearean negotiations: the circulation of social energy in renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S., 2009. Shakespeare and the ethics of authority. In: D. Armitage, C. Condren, and A. Fitzmaurice, eds. Shakespeare and early modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, A., 2005. Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, W.M., 2013. Montaigne’s English journey: reading the essays in Shakespeare’s day. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J., 2008. The fragmentation of renaissance occultism and the decline of magic. In: History of science xlvi, 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1996. Leviathan. fp 1651. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1998. On the Citizen. fp 1647. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J., 2006. Dramatic traditions and Shakespeare’s political thought. In: D. Armitage, ed. British political thought in history, literature and theory 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, D. and Lamport, S., 2003. The palace of enchantments. London: Time Warner Paperbacks. fp 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Jardine, L., 1989. Still harping on daughters: women and drama in the age of Shakespeare. New York: Columbia University Press. 1st edn 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jillette, P., 2011. Who’s the real illusionist? on how modern politics resembles a Vegas magic act. Wall Street Journal, Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903285704576560482965329702 accessed September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., 2014–15. Tricks, politics, and the ‘magic negro’. The Enemy, 2 (1), http://theenemyreader.org/tricks-politics-magic-negro/ accessed September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, A., 2002. Charismatic politics and the symbolic foundations of power in Max Weber. New German Critique, 85, 67–103. doi:10.2307/3115177
   Google Scholar
• Kassell, L., 2005. The practice of reform in health, medicine and science 1500–200. In: M. Pelling and S. Mandelbrote, eds.The economy of magic in early modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kassell, L., 2007. Medicine and magic in Elizabethan London. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kastan, D.S., 1986. Proud majesty made subject: Shakespeare and the spectacle of rule. Shakespeare Quarterly, 37, 459–475. doi:10.2307/2870677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laycock, J. (2011) Romania’s ‘witch tax’: magic meets bureaucracy. Religion Dispatches Available from: http://religiondispatches.org/romanias-witch-tax-magic-meets-bureaucracy/[accessed February 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, M.P. (2017) Politics as Magic: a breakdown of Trump’s deceptions, by a professional liar. Available from: https://bullshit.ist/politics-as-magic-e2c8294c76c5.
   Google Scholar
• Lowrance, B., 2012. Modern ecstasy: Macbeth and the meaning of the political. ELH, 79 (4), 823–849. doi:10.1353/elh.2012.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, A., 2000. Civility and the decline of magic. In: P. Burke, B. Harrison, and P. Slack, eds. Civil histories: essays presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N., 1961. The Prince. fp 1532. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N., 1970. The Discourses. fp 1531. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• May, L., 2012. Hobbes against the jurists: sovereignty and artificial reason. Hobbes Studies, 25, 223–232. doi:10.1163/18750257-02502007
   Google Scholar
• McCann, S. and Szalay, M., 2005. Do you believe in magic? Literary thinking after the new left. Yale Journal of Criticism, 18 (2), 435–468. doi:10.1353/yale.2006.0010
   Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M., 2006a. fp French 1588, English 1603. The institution and education of children. In: The essays, trans.John Florio. London: The Folio Society, 134–175.
   Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M., 2006b. fp French 1588, English 1603 the lame or cripple. In The Essays, trans. John Florio London: The Folio Society. 270–281.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, A.D., 2007. Shakespeare the thinker. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orgel, S., 1987. Introduction. The tempest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, G., 2006. John Dee and the Elizabethan British Empire in its European context. The Historical Journal, 49 (3), 643–675. doi:10.1017/S0018246X06005462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, G., 2012. Occult philosophy and politics: why John Dee wrote his Compendious Rehearsal in November 1592. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 480–488. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, M., 2007. Political Conduct. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posel, D., 2014. Madiba magic: politics as enchantment. In: R. Barnard, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Nelson Mandela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, L., 1994. Oedipus and the devil: witchcraft, religion and sexuality in early modern Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, I., 1989. The political magic of John Dee. History Today, 39 (1), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W., 1984. Julius Caesar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W., 1987. The Tempest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W., 1987a. The tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W., 1990. The Tragedy of Macbeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 2002. Hobbes’s changing conception of civil science. In: Visions of politics iii: Hobbes and civil science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66–86.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 2014. Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, R.E., 1995. Hobbes’ Leviathan: monsters, metaphors, magic. ELH, 62, 791–819. doi:10.1353/elh.1995.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagonist, A. (2017) 2016: The year magic broke into politics. Available from: http://dark-mountain.net/blog/2016-the-year-magic-broke-into-politics/. [accessed May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Tennenhouse, L., 1986. Power on display: the politics of Shakespeare’s genres. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., 1971. Religion and the decline of magic: studies in popular beliefs in sixteenth and seventeenth century England. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Tonge, M., 1932. Black magic and miracles in Macbeth. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 31 (2), 234–246.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society. fp German 1921. Berkeley Ca: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1994. Suffrage and democracy in Germany. In: P. Lassman and R. Speirs, eds. Weber political writings. fp German 1917. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80–129.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1994a. fp German 1919 The profession and vocation of politics. P. Lassman and R. Speirs, eds. Weber political writings, H H Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology ‘Politics as a Vocation’ pp 77–128 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 309–369.
   Google Scholar
• Weimann, R., 1978. Shakespeare and the popular tradition in theater: studies in the social dimension of dramatic form and function. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wlodarczyk, N., 2009. Magic and warfare: appearance and reality in contemporary African conflict and beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar