Demarchy: a flexible deliberative process for contemporary democracies

References

• Ajzenstat, J., 1986. Review of is democracy possible. Journal of Political Science, 19 (September), 205.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J.A., 2008. Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37 (3), 129–139. doi:10.3102/0013189X08317501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S., 1996. Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Vol. 31. New Jersey: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L., 1997. Democracy and decision. The pure theory of electoral preference. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J., 1985. Is democracy possible. In: The alternative to electoral. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J., 2006. Is democracy possible?: The alternative to electoral democracy. 2nd ed., Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J., 2014. Is democracy possible?: The alternative to electoral democracy . Kindle ed. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. Available from Amazon.com
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J., 2016. The Demarchy Manifesto: for better public policy. Sydney: Andrews UK Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Canada Bay Citizens’ Panel, 2012. Canada Bay 2012 Citizens’ Panel Final Report. Available from: http://www.canadabay.nsw.gov.au/verve/_resources/Final_Report_of_the_2012_Citizens_Panel_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carson, L., 2009. Ignorance and inclusion, Mr Jefferson, might be good for democracy. United States Study Centre, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., Rehg, W., & ProQuest. 1997. Deliberative democracy : Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press, 67–92.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., 2000. Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48 (5), 947–969. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven, G., 2005. Referenda, plebiscites and sundry parliamentary impedimenta [Paper presented to the Australasian study of Parliament group, Annual conference (2004: perth)]. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 20 (1), 79.
   Google Scholar
• Curtice, J., 2018. Buyer’s remorse: has Britain changed its mind on brexit? Political Insight, 9 (1), 12–15. doi:10.1177/2041905818764700
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., 2003. Citizenship as a learning process: disciplinary citizenship versus cultural citizenship. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22 (6), 597–605. doi:10.1080/0260137032000138158
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., 2011.Creative democracy-the task before us. In The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce through the Present. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 150–154.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2001. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29 (5), 651–669. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T., 2000. Rethinking democracy and education: towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (2), 305–313. doi:10.1080/002202700182772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enslin, P., Pendlebury, S., and Tjiattas, M., 2001. Deliberative democracy, diversity and the challenges of citizenship education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35 (1), 115–130. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S., 1991. Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform. Vol. 217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S. and Farrar, C., 2005. Deliberative polling: from experiment to community resource. In: Gastil, John, and Peter Levine, eds.The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. 68–79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S. and Luskin, R.C., 2005. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica, 40 (3), 284–298. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M.J. and Heath, O., 2016. The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate‐level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly, 87 (3), 323–332. doi:10.1111/poqu.2016.87.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., 1987. Democratic education. New Jersey: Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., 2009. Why deliberative democracy? New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F.A., 2012. Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Melbourne: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebaum, C., 2013. Demarchy: a dubious conception of global democracy. In: Spheres of global justice. Sydney: Springer Netherlands, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, W., 1986. Is democracy possible? The alternative to electoral politics. International Affairs, 62 (Autumn 1986), 658. doi:10.2307/2618569
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B., 2018. Comparing the Irish abortion vote with the Brexit poll is disingenuous. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/28/irish-abortion-vote-brexit-vote-disingenuous-referendums?CMP=share_btn_link
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H., 2013. Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives. Synthese, 190 (7), 1209–1231. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0062-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, M. and Cavanagh, P., 2005. The parliament and the people and the role of deliberative polling in the South Australian constitutional convention. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 20 (1), 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Makri, A., 2018. Ireland to vote on a referendum to repeal the eighth. The Lancet, 391, 1466–1467. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30891-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 1983. Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 1988. Review of is democracy possible. Political Theory, 16 (November), 654–659. doi:10.1177/0090591788016004010
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 2007. “Deliberative democracy” or “Democratic deliberation”? In: S.W. Rosenberg, ed. Deliberation, participation and democracy: can the people govern? London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 251–271.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 2010. Deliberative polling as the gold standard. The Good Society, 19 (1), 55–62. doi:10.5325/goodsociety.19.1.0055
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B., 2001a. Nonviolence versus capitalism. London: War Resisters’ International.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B., 2001b. A passion for planning. Social Alternatives, 20 (2), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• newDemocracy Foundation, 2011a. Process design overview: a next step in empowered community engagement & decision making. In: City of Canada Bay: fair use of Council facilities. Sydney: The newDemocracy Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• newDemocracy Foundation, 2011b. Process design overview: empowered community engagement & decision-making. Available from: http://www.newdemocracy.com.au/docs/City%20of%20Canada%20Bay_newDemocracy%20Foundation_Oct2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Social Theory and Practice, 3 (4), 487–496. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19753412
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C., 1975. Participation and democratic theory. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1988. Review. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 66 (March), 105–106. doi:10.1080/00048408812350291
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. A theory of justice. rev ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., 1986. Review. Sociology, 20 (May), 287–288. doi:10.1177/0038038586020002013
   Google Scholar
• Talisse, R.B., 2004. Introduction: pragmatism and deliberative politics. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1353/jsp.2004.0009
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, P., 2018. It’s time for Ireland to deliver a credible climate plan. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/08/its-time-for-ireland-to-deliver-a-credible-climate-plan
   Google Scholar
• Uhr, J., 1998. Deliberative democracy in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M.E. and Pearse, H., 2008. Designing deliberative democracy: the British Columbia citizens’ assembly. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1996. Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: S. Benhabib, ed. Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Vol. 31. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaphir, L., 2018. Democratic communities of inquiry: creating opportunities to develop citizenship. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50 (4), 359–368. doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1364156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar