1,247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The desire to locate political space: a methodological discussion

&
Pages 268-284 | Received 05 Jan 2019, Accepted 15 Mar 2020, Published online: 08 Jun 2020

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L., 1990. The romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17 (1), 41–55. doi:10.1525/ae.1990.17.1.02a00030.
  • Ackerly, B.A., Stern, M., and True, J., eds., 2006. Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Afray, J. and Anderson, K.B., 2005. Foucault and the Iranian revolution. Gender and the seduction of Islamism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Agamben, G., 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Alvesson, M., Deetz, S., and Torhell, S.-E., 2000. Kritisk samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Baaz, M., Lilja, M., and Vinthagen, S., 2017. Resistance studies as an academic pursuit. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1 (3), 10–28.
  • Bell, V., 1996. The promise of liberalism and the performance of freedom. In: A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose, eds.. Foucault and political reason, liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bell, V., 2015. Studying provocations: the researchers care for what exists. In: S. Hansson, S. Hellberg, and M. Stern, eds.. Studying the agency of being governed: methodological reflections. London: Routledge, 21–33.
  • Bernauer, J., 2006. An uncritical foucault? Foucault and the Iranian revolution. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32 (6), 781–786. doi:10.1177/0191453706066981.
  • Blundo, G. and Le Meur, P.-Y., eds., 2008. The governance of daily life in Africa. Boston, MA: Brill.
  • Butler, J., 1995. Subjection, resistance, resignification. In: J. Rajchman, ed.. The identity in question. New York, NY: Routledge, 229–250.
  • Butler, J., 1997. The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Butler, J., 2001. What is critique? An essay on foucault’s virtue. In: S. Salih and J. Butler, eds.. The Judith Butler reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 302–322.
  • Chatterjee, P., 1993. The nation and its fragments: colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Coleman, L.M., 2015. Ethnography, commitment, and critique: departing from activist scholarship. International Political Sociology, 9 (3), 263–280. doi:10.1111/ips.12096.
  • de Certeau, M., 1984. The practices of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Dean, M., 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
  • Dean, M., 2015. Afterword: the art of not being governed so much. In: S. Hansson, S. Hellberg, and M. Stern, eds.. Studying the agency of being governed: methodological reflections. London: Routledge, 21–33.
  • Death, C., 2011. Counter-conducts in South Africa: power, government and dissent at the world summit. Globalizations, 8 (4), 425–438. doi:10.1080/14747731.2011.585844.
  • Duffield, M., 2007. Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Evans, B. and Reid, J., 2014. Resilient life. The art of living dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ferguson, J., 2015. Give a man a fish: reflections on the new politics of distribution. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
  • Foucault, M., 1977 [1975]. Discipline and punish, the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds.. The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 87–104.
  • Foucault, M., 1997a. What is Critique? In: S. Lotringer and L. Hochroth, eds.. The politics of truth. New York: Semiotext(e), 41–82.
  • Foucault, M., 1997b. Technologies of the self. In: P. Rabinow, ed.. Essential works of foucault 1954–1984. Ethics, subjectivity and truth. New York: The New Press, 223–252.
  • Foucault, M., 2000. The subject and power. In: J.D. Fabion, ed.. Essential works of foucault 1954–1984. Power. New York: The New Press
  • Foucault, M., 2003. “Society must be defended”, Lectures at the Colle`ge de France 1975–1976. New York: Picador.
  • Foucault, M., 2005. The mythical leader of the Iranian revolution. In: J. Afray and K.B. Anderson, eds.. Foucault and the Iranian revolution. Gender and the seduction of Islamism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Foucault, M., 2011. The courage of truth: lectures at the College de France 1983–1984. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gabay, C., 2011. Consenting to ‘heaven’: the millennium development goals, neo-liberal governance and global civil society in Malawi. Globalizations, 8 (4), 487–501. doi:10.1080/14747731.2011.585852.
  • Gupta, A., 2012. Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Hale, C.R., 2011. Resistencia para que? Territory, autonomy and neoliberal entanglements in the ‘empty spaces’ of Central America. Economy and Society, 40 (2), 184–210. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.548947.
  • Hansson, S., 2013 Who brings the water? Negotiating state responsibility in water sector reform in Niger, PhD thesis, The School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University.
  • Hansson, S., 2015. Dependence and autonomy: conditions of possibility for Nigerien ownership in the water sector. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9 (2), 256–277. doi:10.1080/17502977.2015.1026160.
  • Hansson, S., Hellberg, S., and Stern, M., (eds), 2014. Studying the agency of being governed: methodological reflections. London: Routledge.
  • Hellberg, S., 2014. ‘Water, life and politics: exploring the contested case of eThekwini municipality through a governmentality lens. Geoforum, 56, 226–236. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.004
  • Hellberg, S., 2015 The biopolitics of water: technology, subjectivity and lifestyle in eThekwini municipality, South Africa, PhD Thesis, University of Gothenburg, School of Global Studies, Sweden.
  • Hellberg, S., 2018. The biopolitics of water. London: Governance, Scarcity and Populations, Routledge/Earthscan.
  • Hollander, J.A. and Einwohner, R.L., 2004. Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19 (4), 533–554. doi:10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5.
  • Horkheimer, M., 1982. Critical theory. selected essays. New York: Continuum Pub.
  • Jazeel, T. and McFarlane, C., 2010. The limits of responsibility: a postcolonial politics of academic knowledge production. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35 (1), 109–124. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00367.x.
  • Kapoor, I., 2005. Participatory development, complicity and desire. Third World Quarterly, 26 (8), 1203–1220. doi:10.1080/01436590500336849.
  • Knutsson, B., 2014. Smooth machinery: global governmentality and civil society HIV/AIDS work in Rwanda. Globalizations, 11 (6), 793–807. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.916555.
  • Lacan, J., [1970] 2007. Écrits. New York and London: W &W Norton & Company.
  • Lilja, M., 2008. Power, Resistance and Women Politicians in Cambodia: Discourses of Emancipation. Copenhagen: Nias Press.
  • Lilja, M. and Vinthagen, S., 2018. Dispersed resistance: unpacking the spectrum and properties of glaring and everyday resistance. Journal of Political Power, 11 (2), 211–229. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1478642.
  • Mahmood, S., 2011. Politics of piety. The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mezzadra, S., Reid, J., and Samaddar, R., 2013. The biopolitics of development. New Dehli: Springer.
  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P., 2008. State Bureaucracy and governance in francophone Africa: en empirical diagnosis and historical perspective. In: G. Blundo and P.-Y. Le Meur, eds.. The governance of daily life in Africa. Boston, MA: Brill, 39–72.
  • Prozorov, S., 2015. The artist of not being governed: the emergence of the political subject. In: S. Hansson, S. Hellberg, and M. Stern, eds.. Studying the agency of being governed: methodological reflections. London: Routledge, 21–33.
  • Reid, J., 2012. The disastrous and politically debased subject of resilience. Development Dialogue, 58, 67–79.
  • Rutherford, S., 2007. Green governmentality: insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (3), 291–307. doi:10.1177/0309132507077080.
  • Scott, J., 1985. Weapons of the weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Spivak, G.C., 1988. Can the subaltern speak?. In: L. Grossberg and C. Nelson, eds.. Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–315.
  • Spivak, G.C., 1994. Responsibility. Boundary, 2 (21), 3.
  • Spivak, G.C., 2015. ‘Institutional validation and the agency of the researcher. In: S. Hansson, S. Hellberg, and M. Stern, eds.. Studying the agency of being governed: methodological reflections. London: Routledge, 21–33.
  • Vinthagen, S. and Johansson, A., 2013. “Everyday resistance”: exploration of a concept and its theories. Resistance Studies Magazine, 1, 1–45.
  • Walters, W., 2012. Governmentality. Critical encounters. New York: Routledge.