Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation

References

• Ahlborg, H., 2017. Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 25, 122–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., [1979]2002. On violence. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader, 132–145. Manchester: Manchester University Press
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. 1998. “Empowerment: The Emporor's New Clothes”, Harvard Business Review, 76 (3):98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., 2009. Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 369–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9102-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2011) Power in transition: empowering discourses on sustainability transitions. PhD-Thesis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available from: http://repub.eur.nl/pub/30663/
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., et al., 2016. The politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Policy & Planning, 18 (5), 557–567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., et al., 2017. Guest editorial: game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecology and Society, 22 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09897-220441
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., 2017. Power in sustainability transitions. analysing power and (Dis)empowerment in transformative change towards environmental and social sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Governance, 27 (6), 505–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., et al., 2019. Transformative social innovation and (Dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., et al., 2020. Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks. European Planning Studies, 28, 5,955–977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. and Grin, J., 2017. Beyond deconstruction. A reconstructive perspective on sustainability transition governance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 15–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. and Rotmans, J., 2009. Power in transition. An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (40), 543–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009349830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. and Rotmans, J., 2011. A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (8), 796–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. and Wittmayer, J.M., 2016. Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18 (5), 628–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aladjam, T.K. 1995. “Of Truth and Disagreement: Habermas, Foucault and Democratic Discourse”, History of European Ideas, 20 4–6: 909–914.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1962. The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 53, 947–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., [1988]2002. The NATURE OF POWER. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A reader, 113–131. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D.M. and Rosile, G.A. 2001. “Where is the Power in Empowerment? Answers from Follet and Clegg”, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 37 (1): 90-117.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, W., 2016. Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecology and Society, 21, 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07966-210121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., [1989]2002. Social space and social power. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A Reader, 225–244. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., et al., 2016. The good, the bad and the ugly in social innovation. In: Social Innovations in the urban context. Springer International Publishing, 303–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C., et al., 2005. Systemic Power; Luhmann, Foucault and Analytics of Power, Acta Sociologica, (48) 2 155–267.
   Google Scholar
• Cajaiba-Santana, G., 2014. Social innovation: moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CConger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. 1988. The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Review, 13(3): 471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 2009. Foundations of organization power. Journal of Political Power, 2 (1), 35–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290902760873
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., [1989]2002. Frameworks of power. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A reader, 245–273. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., [1968]2002. Power’. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A reader, 5–25. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K., Leijenaar, M., and Oldersma, J., [1991] 2002. The gender of power. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A reader, 205–224. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, T. 1993. “The Deceptive Allure of Empowerment”, Long Range Planning, 26 (6): 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmes, M. and Smith, C. 2001. “Moved by the Spirit: Contextualizing Workplace Empowerment in American Spiritual Ideas”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 37 (1): 22–50.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Power and rationality: democracy in practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2004. “Phronetic planning research: theoretical and methodological reflections”. Planning Theory and Practice, 5 (3), 283–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000250195
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977]2002. Discipline and Punish. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader, 181–204. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power and Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1984. Of other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité, 5, 46–49. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/foucault1.pdf (pp 1–9) [online] . [Accessed 20 Dec 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Franz, H.W., Hochgerner, J., and Howaldt, J., 2012. Challenge social innovation: potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gandz, J. And Bird, F.G. 1996 “The Ethics of Empowerment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 383–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. and J. Schot 2007. “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways”, Research Policy, 36 (3): 399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., 2005. Technological transitions and system innovations; a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., 2010. “Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective”. Research Policy, 39 (4), 495–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. and Schot, J., 2010. The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective’part I. In: J. Grin, J. Rotmans, and J. Schot, eds. Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change, 11–104. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, 21–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., [1984]2002. The constitution of society. outline of the theory of structuration. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader, 146–165. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, N., 2002. On visibility and power: an arendtian corrective of Foucault. Human Studies, 25, 125–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015599323147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., 2010. Understanding transitions from a governance perspective, part III. In: J. Grin, J. Rotmans, and J. Schot, eds. Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change, 223–319. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., and Schot, J., 2010. Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, R.M.R., 2001. Scientia Potestas Est – Knowledge is Power: Francis Bacon to Michel Foucault. Neohelicon, 28 (1), 109–122
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. and Leiba-O'Sullivan, S. 1998. The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice, Human Relations, 51 (4): 451–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., eds., 2002. Power: a reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Haxeltine, A., et al., 2017. Building a middle-range theory of transformative social innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2 (1), 59–77. http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/51
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, L. and Lukes, S., 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue. Journal of Political Power, 1 (1), 5–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943364
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C., 2009. Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 341–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9095-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C.M. and Grin, J., 2007. ‘Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of dutch transitions to sustainability’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3–4), 333–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J., 2013. Industrial fields and countervailing power: the transformation of distributed solar energy in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 847–855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J., 2014. Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy, 43 (2), 278–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., 2013. Theorizing power in transition studies: the role of creativity and novel practices in structural change. Policy Science, 46 (3), 257–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9173-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infinito, J., (2003). Ethical Self-formation: A Look at the Later Foucault. Educational Theory, 53 (2)2; 155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Juhl, H.J., Kristensen, K., Dahlgaard, J.J., Kanji, G.K. 1997. “Empowerment and Organizational Structure”, Total Quality Management, 8 (1): 103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., 2011. Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability”. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 29 (6), 1116–1134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/c1142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F. and Howlett, M., 2009. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 391–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., and Avelino, F., 2017. Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., [1974]2002. Power: a radical view. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader, 38–58. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., [1986]2002. The sources of social power Vol.1ʹ. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader, 166–180. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. and Haugaard, M., 2011. Reflections on the sources of power”. Journal of Political Power, 4 (2), 169–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.589258
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., and Truffer, B., 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41 (6), 955–967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, M., 2009. ‘What about the Politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions’. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 323–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, M., 2011. “Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions”. Journal of Societal Transitions and Environmental Innovation, 1 (1), 70–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., Riddell, D., & Vocisano, D. 2015. Scaling Out , Scaling Up , Scaling Deep, Social Innovation, (58), 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M.-L., et al., 2014. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society, 19 (4), 54. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06966-190454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P., 1987]2002. Power: A philosophical analysis. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: A Reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 278–303.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., et al., 2007. Introduction: social innovation and governance in European cities: urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14 (3), 195–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. (Ed.). 2013. The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Mehmood, Abid, MacCallum, Diana and Leubolt, Bernhard, eds. 2017. Social innovation as a trigger for transformations - the role of research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., [1967]2002. On the concept of political power. sociological theory and modern society. In: M. Haugaard, ed. Power: a reader,67–112. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L., 2015. No change without power – an Agenda for a multidimensional understanding of power in sustainability research. GAIA, 24/1 (2015), 48–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L. and Fuchs, D., 2012. Philanthropy: power with in international relations. Journal of Political Power, 5 (3), 359–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.735114
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B., et al., 2020. Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy, 49 (8), 104080. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollit, C. (2008). Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R.E., Spreitzer, G.M. 1997. The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider, Organizational Dynamics, 26 (2):37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RFlyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrígez García, J M. 2001. “Scientia Potestas Est – Knowledge is Power: Francis Bacon to Michel Foucault”, Neohelicon, 28 (1): 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Leach, M., and Newell, P., eds. 2015. The politics of green transformations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Cato, M. and Hillier, J., 2010. How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying deleuzean philosophy to transition towns. Environmental Politics, 19 (6), 869–887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.518677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, W.H., 1992. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/229967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. and Walker, G., 2007. CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment & Planning A, 39, 763–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. and Walker, G., 2008. ‘Transition management and the politics of shape shifting’. Environment & Planning A, 40, 1012–1014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a4004leb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. and Kern, F., 2009. “The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy”. Environmental Politics, 18 (1), 78–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802624835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. and Stirling, A., 2010. The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15 (1), 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03218-150111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., and Berkhout, F., 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1491–1510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G.M. De Janasz, S.C. and Quinn, R.E., 1999. Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4): 511–527 doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A., 2001. Theories of Power and Domination. The Politics of Empowerment in Late Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42 (11), 1991–2006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S., et al., 2020. Everyone a changemaker? Exploring the moral underpinnings of social innovation discourse through real utopias. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1738532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K.W. and Velthouse, B.A., 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretative” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4), 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, K., 2003. “Forms of resistance: Foucault on tactical reversal and self-formation”. Continental Philosophy Review, 36:113–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Have, R.P. and Rubalcaba, L., 2016. Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45 (9), 1923–1935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., and Grin, J., 2009. Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 275–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, F.R., et al., 2016. How game changers catalyzed, disrupted, and incentivized social innovation: three historical cases of nature conservation, assimilation, and women’s rights. Ecology and Society, 21 (4), 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08811-210413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar