Power: ambiguous not vague

References

• Abell, P., 1977. The many faces of power and liberty: revealed preference, autonomy, and teleological explanation. Sociology, 11 (1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/003803857701100101.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1999. The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance, solidarity. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B., 2002. Capitalists rule OK? Some puzzles about power. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 1 (2), 155–184. doi:10.1177/1470594X02001002001.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B., 2003. Capitalists rule OK? A commentary on Keith Dowding. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2 (3), 323–341. doi:10.1177/1470594X030023003.
   Google Scholar
• Battegazzorre, F., 2017. Some reflections on the power to/power over debate. Journal of Political Power, 10 (3), 274–285. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1382169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K., and Xu, Y., 2003. Similarity of options and the measurement of diversity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15 (4), 405–422. doi:10.1177/0951692803154004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, W. and Dowding, K., 2019. The Cambridge School and Kripke: bug detecting with the history of political thought. The Review of Politics, 81 (4), 621–642. doi:10.1017/S0034670519000512.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D.J., 2011. Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review, 120 (4), 515–566. doi:10.1215/00318108-1334478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2 (3), 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303.
   Google Scholar
• De Dijn, A., 2020. Freedom: an unruly history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2003. Resources, Power and Systematic Luck: A Response to Barry. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2 (3), 305–322. doi:10.1177/1470594X030023002.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2006. Three-Dimensional Power: A Discussion of Steven Lukes‘ Power: A Radical View. Political Studies Review, 4 (2), 136–145. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000100.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2008. Agency and structure: interpreting power relationships. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/17540290801943380.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2012. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 119–135. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2016. The philosophy and methods of political science. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2019. Rational choice and political power: the original text with two new chapters. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. and Bosworth, W., 2018. Ambiguity and vagueness in political terminology: on coding and referential imprecision. European Journal of Political Theory, 147488511877125. online first. doi:10.1177/1474885118771256.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. and Van Hees, M., 2007. Counterfactual success and negative freedom. Economics and Philosophy, 23 (2), 141–162. doi:10.1017/S0266267107001344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. and Van Hees, M., 2009. Freedom of choice. In: P. Anand, P.K. Pattanaik, and C. Puppe, eds.. Oxford handbook of rational and social choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–392.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., 1978. Can there be vague objects? Analysis, 38 (4), 208. doi:10.1093/analys/38.4.208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., 2004. Linking power and poverty reduction. In: R. Alsop, ed.. Power, rights and poverty: concepts and connections. Washington, DC: World Bank, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2015. The history of sexuality, vol. 1: the will to knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W.B., 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1), 167–198. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 2005. The concept of power: a constructivist analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33 (3), 495–521. doi:10.1177/03058298050330031301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, C.R., 2000. De-facing power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, J., 1987. Power and Marxist theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, J. 2000. Power-with, not power-over. Peace News, June–August, 35.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., 1988. Vague identity: evans misunderstood. Analysis, 48 (3), 128–130. doi:10.1093/analys/48.3.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, E.S., 1993. The economic effects of physical appearance. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 420–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view: the original text with two major new chapters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2021. Power and rational choice. Journal of Political Power, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed, T. and Bonzionelos, N., 2012. Managerial promotion and height. Psychological Reports, 112, 587–593.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, D., et al. 2000. New York: Oxford University Press/World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M.C., 2000. Women and human development: the capability approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M.C., 2011. Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, F., 1981. Political concepts: a reconstruction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2011. Power with. In: K. Dowding, ed. Encyclopedia of power. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 527–528.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2014. Just freedom: a moral compass for a complex world. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H.F., 1972. Wittgenstein and justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stulp, G., et al., 2013. Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (1), 159–171. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J., et al., 1999. Women and power: fight patriarchies and poverty. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hees, M., 2004. Freedom of choice and diversity of options: some difficulties. Social Choice and Welfare, 22 (1), 253–266. doi:10.1007/s00355-003-0285-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J., 2002. Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law and Philosophy, 21, 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, L., 2009. Types and tokens: on abstract objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T., 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar