The new concepts of power? Power-over, power-to and power-with

References

• Allen, A., 1998. Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13 (1), 21–40. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1999. The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance, solidarity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2016. Power and international relations: A conceptual approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battegazzorre, F., 2017. Some reflections on the power to/power over debate. Journal of Political Power, 10 (3), 274–285. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1382169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N.J., 2019. In political seas: engaging with political ecology in the ocean and coastal environment. Coastal Management, 47 (1), 67–87. doi:10.1080/08920753.2019.1540905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra, W.J., 2016. Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecology and Society, 21 (1). doi:10.5751/ES-07966-210121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I., 2016. Unpacking the notion of participation in participatory design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25 (6), 425–475. doi:10.1007/s10606-016-9259-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. and Mak, B., 2020. Understanding Chinese girlfriend getaways: an interdependence perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 81, 102878. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.102891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2 (3), 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K.M.,2019[1991]. Rational choice and political power. 2nd ed. Bristol: Bristol University Press
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K.M., 1996. Power. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., 2004. Linking power and poverty reduction. In: R. Alsop, ed. Power, rights and poverty: concepts and connections. Washington, DC: The World Bank pp. 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M.P., 1940. In: H.C. Metcalf and L. Urwick, eds. Dynamic administration. The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Galiè, A. and Farnworth, C.R., 2019. Power through: A new concept in the empowerment discourse. Global Food Security, 21, 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.07.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallarotti, G.M., 2016. Compound soft power: the BRICS and the multilateralization of soft power. Journal of Political Power, 9 (3), 467–490. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., 2006. Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37 (6), 23–33. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, S., 2015. Encountering occupy London: boundary making and the territoriality of urban activism. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 33 (2), 314–330. doi:10.1068/d14041p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2015. Concerted power over. Constellations, 22 (1), 147–158. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018a. Justification and the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018b. What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18 (2), 104–132. doi:10.1177/1468795X17723737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power. Understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1985[1641]. Leviathan. New York: Penguin Books
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., 2010a. Change the world without taking power: the meaning of revolution today. Vol. New ed. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., 2010b. Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. London: MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 1994. Using power/fighting power. Constellations, 1 (1), 53–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00004.x.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002[1988]. Power: a philosophical analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2011a. Power to and power over. In: K. Dowding, ed. Encyclopedia of power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 521–524.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2011b. Power with. In: K. Dowding, ed. Encyclopedia of power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 527–528.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012a. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012b. On abilities and power again: a reply to Peter Morriss. Journal of Political Power, 5 (3), 493–497. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.735120.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012c. Power and freedom: opposite or equivalent concepts? Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 59 (132), 26–44. doi:10.3167/th.2012.5913203.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2013. A non-normative theory of power and domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (5), 614–633. doi:10.1080/13698230.2012.691204.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2016. Democracy, domination and the distribution of power: substantive Political Equality as a Procedural Requirement. Revue Internationale De Philosophie, 70(275), 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L., 2017. ‘Power with’ and ‘power to’ in environmental politics and the transition to sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26 (2), 193–211. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1256961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, J., 2013. Power Analysis: A Practical Guide [online]. Stockholm, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). Available from https://www.sida.se/contentassets/83f0232c5404440082c9762ba3107d55/power-analysis-apracticalguide_3704.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. and Williams, O.R., 2016. Against power? Distinguishing between acquisitive resistance and subversion. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 98 (3), 171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H., 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raffnsøe, S., 2013. Beyond rule; trust and power as capacities. Journal of Political Power, 6 (2), 241–260. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2013.809216.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J., 1997. Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B., 1938. Power: A new social analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, D., 2015. The concept of power in the analysis of organisations with social and political goals. Journal of Political Power, 8 (3), 301–320. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Thomé, K. and Mäntysalo, R., 2014. Interplay of power and learning in planning processes: A dynamic view. Planning Theory, 13 (2), 115–135. doi:10.1177/1473095213490302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J. and Gordon, M., 2017. Democratic tensions in decentralised planning–Rhetoric, legislation and reality in England. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (7), 1324–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J.A., 2013. Constructing empowered women: cinematic images of power and powerful women. In: J.A. Sutherland and K.M. Feltey, eds. Cinematic sociology: social life in film. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/Pine Forge, 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J.A. and Feltey, K.M., 2017. Here’s looking at her: an intersectional analysis of women, power and feminism in film. Journal of Gender Studies, 26 (6), 618–631. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1152956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiernan, A. and O’Connor, P., 2020. Perspectives on power over and power to: how women experience power in a mining community in Zimbabwe. Journal of Political Power, 13 (1), 86–105. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2020.1720089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J.G., et al., 1999. Women and power: fighting patriarchies and poverty. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turcsanyi, R.Q., 2017. Assessing the power of China: insights from the conceptual thinking about power. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22 (3), 473–486. doi:10.1007/s11366-017-9499-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baarle, S., et al., 2019. Beyond command and control: tensions arising from empowerment initiatives. Organization Studies, 0170840618818600, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• VeneKlasen, L. and Miller, V., 2002. A new weave of power, people and politics: the action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. Oklahoma City, OK: World Neighbors.
   Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T.E., 1990. The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society. G. Roth and C. Wittich, eds. Berkeley: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, L.A. and Vendrzyk, J.M., 2020. Improving US army civil affairs assessment through social power analysis. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 31 (3), 612–638. doi:10.1080/09592318.2020.1726576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woroniecki, S., et al., 2019. The framing of power in climate change adaptation research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change, 10 (6), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar