Conceptual analysis of power: basic trends

References

• Akram, S., Emerson, G., and Marsh, D., 2015. (Re)Conceptualising the third face of power: insights from Bourdieu and Foucault. Journal of Political Power, 8 (3), 345–362. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1998. Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13 (1), 21–40. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1999. The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance, solidarity. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 2014. The power family tree. Journal of Political Power, 7 (3), 443–449. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.963380
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., 2007. Power and social antology. Malmo: Bokbox Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On Violence. London: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D., 1989. Paradoxes of power. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P., 1964. Exchange and power in social life. Wiley: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 2014. Circuits of power/knowledge. Journal of Political Power, 7 (3), 383–392. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.965538
   Google Scholar
• Crenson, M., 1971. The Un-politics of air pollution: a study of non-decision-making in the cities. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., 1986. Power as the control of behaviour. In: S. Lukes, ed.. Power. Blackwell: Oxford, 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 2012. The signature of power. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 101–117. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.659864
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54 (4), 977–1007. doi:10.2307/2132105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2008. Agency and structure: interpreting power relationships. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/17540290801943380
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2012. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 119–135. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2019. Rational choice and political power. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., 1980. Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an appalachian valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., 2010. Powercube: understanding power for social change. Institute of development studies. UK: University of Sussex. Online resource: http://www.powercube.net
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. The outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1985. A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Vol. 2. The nation state and violence. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gohler, G., 2009. Power to’ and ‘power over. In: S. Clegg and M. Haugaard, eds.. The sage handbook of power. Los Angeles: Sage, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., 2009. The history of community power. In: J.S. Davies and D.L. Imbroscio, eds.. Theories of urban politics. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1), 87–113. doi:10.1177/1368431003006001562
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2008a. Power and habitus. Journal of Political Power, 1 (2), 189–206. doi:10.1080/17540290802227593
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2008b. Sociologial Lukes versus moral Lukes: reflections on the second edition of power: A radical view by Steven Lukes. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 99–106. doi:10.1080/17540290801943471
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. and Clegg, S., 2009. Introduction. Why power is the central concept of the social sciences. In: S. Clegg and M. Haugaard, eds.. The sage handbook of power. Los Angeles: Sage, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2010. Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13 (4), 419–438. doi:10.1177/1367549410377152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. and Ryan, K., 2012. Introduction. In: M. Haugaard and K. Ryan, eds.. Political power: the development of the field. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., 2000. De-facing power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. and Lukes, S., 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17540290801943364
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2008. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power, 1 (1), 37–49. doi:10.1080/17540290801943406
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2012. Theorizing power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B., 1996. Discourses of power: from hobbes to foucault. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1996. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jouvenel, B., 1948. Power: the natural history of its growth. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. and Kaplan, A., 1950. Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledyaev, V., 1998. Power: A conceptual analysis. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ledyaev, V., 2012. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of power]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, A., 1974. Power: A radical view. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, C., 1934. Political power: its composition and incidence. New York: McGrow-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 1987. Power: A philosophical analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: A philosophical analysis. 2nd. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., 2011. Perspectives on power. Journal of Political Power, 4 (1), 87–103. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2011.555961
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1963. On the concept of political power. In: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107, 232–258.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N., 1963. Community power and political theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N., 1980. Community power and political theory. 2nd. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J., 2012. Is power zero-sum or variable-sum? Old arguments and new beginnings. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 5–31. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.659865
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B., 1938. Power: a new social anslysis. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. and Haugaard, M., 2012. Social and political power. In: M. Haugaard and K. Ryan, eds.. Political power: the development of the field. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 23–56.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, M., 2010. Power and critique. Journal of Power, 3 (1), 7–20. doi:10.1080/17540291003630320
   Google Scholar
• Spinosa, B., 2002. Political treatise. In: M.L. Morgan, ed.. Complete works. Indianapolis, In: Hackett, 676–754.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D., 1979. Power. Its forms, bases, and uses. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D., 2002. Power. Its forms, bases, and uses. With a new introduction by the author. 3rd. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar