An application of the four-dimensional model of power: the case of Khutsong

References

• Adebayo, P.W., 2011. Post-apartheid housing policy and a somewhat altered state role: does incremental housing still have a place in South Africa. The Built Environment Review, 4 (2), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Aigbavboa, C.O. and Thwala, W.D., 2013. Residents’ perception of subsidised low-income housing in South Africa: A case study of Kliptown, Johannesburg. Journal of Human Ecology, 42 (1), 17–23. doi:10.1080/09709274.2013.11906577.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S., 1962. The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56 (4), 947–952. doi:10.2307/1952796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, S.M. and Van Ryneveld, M., 2007. Improving the location of low income housing delivery in South African urban areas. Computers in urban planning and urban management. 10th International Congress. 11–13 July 2007 Mabu Thermas & Resort, Iguassu Falls, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, S. and Kihato, C., 2006. Reaching the poor? An analysis of the influences on the evolution of South Africa’s housing programme. In: U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, and J. Du Toit, eds.. Democracy and delivery: urban policy in South Africa. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council, 258–282.
   Google Scholar
• Charter, T.F., 1955. Available from: https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/freedom-charter [Accessed 20 March 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2 (3), 202–215.
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54 (4), 977–1007. doi:10.2307/2132105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehebrecht, D., 2015. The challenge of informal settlement upgrading: breaking new ground in Hangberg, Cape Town? Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., 2018. Power in action. democracy, citizenship and social justice. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goebel, A., 2007. Sustainable Urban Development? Low-cost housing challenges in South Africa. Habitat International, 31 (3–4), 291–302. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, B.-C., 2019. What is power? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018. Justification and the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, M., 2009. The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlements: a reflection on cases in Gauteng. Development Southern Africa, 26 (1), 59–73. doi:10.1080/03768350802640099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javornicky, M., 2020. In the eye of the potentially non-confirm-structuring beholder: agent-centred reading of four-dimensional model of power. Journal of Political Power, 13 (1), 60–85. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2019.1632005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F., 2003. Continuities, Ambiguities and Contradictions: the past, present and possible future of housing policy practice in South Africa. In: F. Khan and P. Thring, eds.. Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Sandown: Heinemann. 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J. and Phokela, C., 2010. Khutsong and xenophobic violence: exploring the case of the dog that didn’t bark. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg, Centre for Sociological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power. A Radical View. Second edition ed.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matebesi, S. and Botes, L., 2011. Khutsong cross-boundary protests: the triumph and failure of participatory governance? Politeia, 30 (1), 4–221.
   Google Scholar
• MCLM, 2009. Merafong city integrated development plan. Carletonville: Merafong City Local Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Mupambwa, G. 2016. Housing provision systems and power dynamics: the case of Khutsong. Thesis (PhD). North West University.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, M., 2005. Core housing and subsidies in South Africa: addressing the unintended outcomes. 33rd IAHS World Congress on Housing Transforming Housing, 27–30 September 2005 University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ndinda, C., Uzodike, U.O., and Winnaar, L., The Politics of Housing. 2010. HSRC Review, [online]., Available at: http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/review/August-2010/politics-of-housing.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwoudt, A., 2013. Khutsong resettlement plan: implementation. Unpublished document. Carletonville: Merafong City Local Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• PPEC, 2008–2016. ProPlan Engineering Consulting 2008–2016. khutsong south development 18000 stands: summary progress report. Carletonville: Merafong City Local Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• PSCM, 2008–2016. Khutsong south extension project steering committee minutes (PSCM). Carletonville: Department of Human Settlements, Merafong City Local Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1985. Weapons of the weak. everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tau, R., N2 Gateway, zanemvula and khutsong priority projects: department of human settlements briefing. 2009. Parliamentary Monitoring Group (PMG), [online]., Available at: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/10959/.
   Google Scholar
• Venter, A. and Marais, L., 2010. Housing policy and housing-policy research. International Journal for Housing Science, 34 (4), 249–264.
   Google Scholar