Why does publicity matter? Power, not deliberation

References

• Allport, G., 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B., 2001. Malled, mauled, and overhauled: arresting suburban sprawl by transforming suburban malls into usable civil space. In: M. Henaff and T. Strong, eds. Public space and democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 201–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, S., 2000. Constructing inequality: city spaces and the architecture of citizenship. Political Theory, 28 (3), 355–376. doi:10.1177/0090591700028003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. and Snyder, M.G., 1997. Fortress America: gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 1999. “Citizenship and norms of publicity: wide public reason in cosmopolitan societies. Political Theory, 27 (2), 176–202. doi:10.1177/0090591799027002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C., ed., 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Carmen, B., 1996. Easton tax deals. Columbus Dispatch, 23 (July), p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• Caspary, W., 2000. Dewey on democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center, E.T. 2020. Our promises to our guests [online]. Available from: https://eastontowncenter.com/Portals/0/EastonCodeofCoduct.pdf?ver=2019-05-22-103148-657. Accessed 18 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Damico, A., 1978. Individuality and community: the social and political thought of John Dewey. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., 1990. City of quartz: excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J., 2002. Publicity’s secret: how technoculture capitalizes on democracy. cy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., 1954. The public and its problems. 1927. Athens, Ohio: Swallow.
   Google Scholar
• Festenstein, M., 1997. Pragmatism and political theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R., 2002. Towards an open-minded space. In: D. Smiley, ed. Sprawl and public space: redressing the mall. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fominaya, C., 2010. Creating cohesion from diversity: the challenge of collective identity formation in the global justice movement. Sociological Inquiry, 80 (3), 377–404. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2010.00339.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., 1992. Rethinking the public sphere. In: C. Calhoun, ed. C. Calhoun. ed: Habermas and the public sphere, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, B. and Sagalyn, L., 1989. Downtown, inc.: how America rebuilds cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frug, G., 2011. Voting and justice. In: C.R. Hayward and T. Swanstrom, eds. Justice and the American metropolis, 201–222. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., 1992. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R., 2001. Public goods, private goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., 2019. Citizen Brown: race, democracy, and inequality in the St. Louis suburbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. 1962. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., 2000. De-facing power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. and Lukes, S., 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: a dialogue. Journal of Power, 1 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17540290801943364
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, R.W., 2009. Reconstructing Dewey on power.”. Political Theory, 37 (6), 780–807. doi:10.1177/0090591709345454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E., 1990. Sacrifice for the cause: group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement.”. American Sociological Review, 55 (2), 243–254. doi:10.2307/2095630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, B., 2017. Public things: democracy in disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 1998. Democracy as reflexive cooperation: john Dewey and the theory of democracy today.”. Political Theory, 26 (6), 763–783. doi:10.1177/0090591798026006001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J., 2000. Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (1), 367–369. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., 1985. Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., 2004. Brave new neighborhoods: the privatization of public space. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., 2013. Privatization and protest: occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), 99–110. doi:10.1017/S1537592712003623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunstler, J., 1996. Home from nowhere: remaking our everyday world for the twenty-first century. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, W., 1922. Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, W., 1925. The phantom public. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., 2004. Behind the gates: life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E., 1994. Privatopia: homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W., 1969. Sociology and pragmatism: the higher learning in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, E. 2015. Mall of America protesters enter pleas, supporters vow boycott. TwinCities.com, 10 March. Available from: https://www.twincities.com/2015/03/09/mall-of-america-protesters-enter-pleas-supporters-vow-boycott/. Accessed 25 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D., 2008. Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory?”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 521–538. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, M., 2004. Impossible subjects: illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., 2012. Democracy and public space: the physical sites of democratic performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T., 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49 (1), 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. and Tropp, L. 2000. Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In: S. Oskam, ed. Reducing prejudice and discrimination, 93–114. Mahway, NJ: Earlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Poletta, F. and Jasper, J., 2001. Collective identity and social movements”. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (1), 283–305. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
   Google Scholar
• Rabbat, N., 2012. “The Arab revolution takes back public space.”. Critical Inquiry, 39 (1), 198–208. doi:10.1086/668055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., 2002. Redressing the mall. In: D. Smiley, ed. Sprawl and public space: Redressing the mall, 3–7. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., 2009. “Democracy, elites, and power: john Dewey reconsidered.”. Contemporary Political Theory, 8 (1), 68–89. doi:10.1057/cpt.2008.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R., 1970. The uses of disorder: personal identity and city life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M., ed., 1992. Variations on a theme park: the new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Y., 2005. What’s in name? Plenty. Retail Traffic, 34 (5), 178–179.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J., 2002. The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy. Modern Law Review, 65 (2), 204–228. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00375
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., 2002. Easton rounding up youths who hang around after 9:30. Columbus Dispatch, 31 (July), p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G., 1914. The great society: a psychological analysis. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, T., 2016. Blazing the neoliberal trail: urban political development in the United States and the United Kingdom. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook., R., 1991. John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, S., 2004. Politics and vision. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar