Soft power: the evolution of a concept

References

• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1963. Decisions and nondecisions: an analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57, 632–642. doi:10.2307/1952568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakalov, I., 2019. Whither soft power? Divisions, milestones, and prospects of a research program in the making. Journal of Political Power, 12, 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2002. Power and international relations. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons, eds. Handbook of international relations. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2016. Power and international relations: a conceptual approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K.E., 1989. Three faces of power. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chief of Naval Operations, 2007. A cooperative strategy for 21st century seapower. Washington, D.C. : US Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, R.S., 1977. World power assessment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1961. Who governs: democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54, 107–997. doi:10.2307/2132105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2008. Agency and structure: interpreting power relationships. Journal of Power Studies, 1, 21–36. doi:10.1080/17540290801943380
   Google Scholar
• Economist, The. 2020. The parable of the plug. February 8, p23.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, N., 2003. Think again: power. Foreign Policy, 134, 18–22. doi:10.2307/3183518
   Google Scholar
• Gallarotti, G., 2016. Compound soft power: the BRICS and the multilateralization of soft power. Journal of Political Power, 9, 3. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallarotti, G. and Filali, A., 2012. The soft power of Saudi Arabia. International Studies, 49 (3&4), 233–261. doi:10.1177/0020881714532707
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, L., 2009. Power rules: how common sense can rescue American foreign policy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 1993. Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis. International Organization, 47, 443–479. doi:10.1017/S0020818300028022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J., ed., 2009. Civilizations in world politics: plural and pluralist perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P., 1987. The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. and Nye, J., 1977. Power and Interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Laidi, Z., 2019. The hardening of soft power, Project Syndicate, November 4.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, C., 2010. The unbearable lightness of soft power. In: I. Parmer and M. Cox, eds. Soft power and U.S. foreign policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: A radical view. Second Edition. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstadt, K., 1998. Empire by invitation: the United States and European integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G., 1966. The power of power. In: D. Easton, ed. Varieties of political theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, J.B., 2005. Why soft power isn’t so soft: representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 33, 583–612. doi:10.1177/03058298050330031601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, J., 1975. The descriptive analysis of power. New Haven: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 1965. Pan-Africanism and East African integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 1988. Neo-realism and neo-liberalism. World Politics, XL, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 1990. Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 2004. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 2011. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 2020. Do morals matter? Presidents and foreign policy from FDR to Trump. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, D., 2020. China and the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S., 1988. States and markets. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Taverner, A., 2010. The military use of soft power – information campaigns: the challenge of applications, their audiences and effects. In: I. Parmer and M. Cox, eds. Soft power and U.S. foreign policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, A., et al., 2000. Measuring national power in the postindustrial age: analysts handbook. Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Vuving, A., 2009. How soft power works. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. and Ludwig, J., 2017. The meaning of sharp power: how authoritarian states project influence. Foreign Affairs, November 16.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K., 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, S., 2020. Conceptual politics in practice: how soft power changed the world. Stockholm Studies in International Relations, 2020, 3.
   Google Scholar