Why More Civil Society Will Not Lead to Less Domination: Dealing with Present Day State Phobia through Michel Foucault and Neo-Republicanism

References

• Akman, A., 2012. Beyond the objectivist conception of civil society: social actors, civility and self-limitation. Political Studies, 60 (2), 321–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00913.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrent, M.C., 2016. Conclusion. In: D. Zamora and M.C. Behrent, eds. Foucault and neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I., 2002. Two concepts of liberty. Isaiah berlin, liberty. ed., H. Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online November 2003 DOI:10.1093/019924989X.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, G.D., 2015. On the source, site and modes of domination. Journal of Political Power, 8 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2015.1010800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2012. Critical theory, republicanism, and the priority of injustice: transnational republicanism as a nonideal theory. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43 (2), 97–112. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W., 2015. Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Casassas, D. and Jurgen, D.W., 2016. Republicanism and the political economy of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 19 (2), 283–300. doi:10.1177/1368431015600026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J.L. and Arato, A., 1999. Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission for a Socially Sustainable Malmö, 2013. Malmö’s path towards a sustainable future: health, welfare and justice. Malmö: Malmö Stad.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Meneguzzo, M., and Riccucci, N., 2017. Collaborative administration: the management of successful networks. Public Management Review, 19 (3), 275–283. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 2014. Michel foucault’s ‘apology’for neoliberalism.” lecture delivered at the british library on the 30th anniversary of the death of michel foucault, june 25, 2014. Journal of Political Power, 7 (3), 433–442. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.967002
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 2016. Foucault, Ewald, Neoliberalism and the Left. In: D. Zamora and M.C. Behrent, eds. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. and Villadsen, K., 2016. State phobia and civil society: the political legacy of michel foucault. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., 2007. Adam Ferguson : selected Philosophical Writings. ed. Heath, A. Exeter, UK: Andrews UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., et al., 2011. Public policy networks and ‘wicked problems’: a nascent solution? Public Administration, 89 (2), 307–324. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01896.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society? British Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1984. Du Pouvoir. A 1978 interview with P. Boncenne. L’Express, 1722 ( 6–12 July 1984 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1987. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: an Interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. eds., R.F. Betancourt, Philosophy and Social Criticism. Vol. 12. 2-3 112–131. Sage. 10.1177/019145378701200202.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1988. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In: J. Bernauer and D. Rasmussen, eds. The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.24–53
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1990. The History of Sexuality: an Introduction. Vol. 1. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997. Sexual Choice, Sexual Act. In: P. Rabinow, ed. Ethics: subjectivity and Truth. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984. Vol. 1. translated by Robert Hurley and others. New York: New Press. 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2004. Society Must be Defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2007. Security, Territory, Population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2010. The Government of Self and Others: lectures at the Collège de France 1982-1983. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2012a. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2012b. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 2. The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E., 1994. Conditions of Liberty: civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, B., 2015. Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., 1996. F“oucault in Britain. In: A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose, eds. Foucault and Political Reason: liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: University of Chigaco Press, 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, B., 2000. Critique of Violence: between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1994. Leviathan, with Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., 2007. From micro-powers to governmentality: foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography, 26 (1), 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, M., Peter, and Villadsen, K., 2015. Foucault, maoism, genealogy: the influence of political militancy in michel foucault’s thought, new political science. 37 (1), 91–117. New Political Science. doi:10.1080/07393148.2014.94525
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J., 1998. Civil Society: old Images, New Visions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John., 2004. Violence and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kriegel, B., 2001. The State and the Rule of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., 1993. Civil society: an inquiry into the usefulness of an historical term. British Journal of Sociology, 44 (3), 375–395. doi:10.2307/591808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cour, A. and Andersen, N.A., 2016. Metagovernance as strategic supervision. Public Performance and Management Review, 39 (4), 905–925. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1180305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., 2013. Sovereign power beyond the state: a critical reappraisal of governance by networks. Critical Policy Studies, 7 (2), 99–114. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.784624
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. 2015 The governmentality of meta-governance: identifying theoretical and empirical challenges of network governance in the political field of security and beyond. Diss. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., 2019. A theoretical framework for analyzing institutionalized domination in network governance arrangements. Critical Policy Studies, 13 (1), 81–100. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1393440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., 2020. The governmentality of network governance: collaboration as a new facet of the liberal art of governing. Constellations, 2020 (27), 111–126. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12447
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T., 2012. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Boulder, CO, and London: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, J., 1776. An Answer to the Declaration of the American Congress. London: T. Cadell in the Strand; J. Walter, Charingcross; and T. Sewell, near the Royal Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R.A., 2016. Foucault’s Critical Ethics. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K., 1995. Taking Liberties in Foucault’s Triangle: sovereignty, Discipline, Governmentality, and the Subject of Rights. In: A. Sarat and T.R. Kearns, eds. Identities, Politics, and Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 149–192.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, J., ed., 1998. The Later Foucault: politics and Philosophy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P., 2005. Foucault, critique and rights. Critical Horizons, 6 (1), 267–287. doi:10.1163/156851605775009456.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, V., Naja, C.D., and Triantafillou, P., 2011. Histories and freedom of the present: foucault and skinner. History of the Human Sciences, 24 (5), 124–141. doi:10.1177/0952695111415176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2012. On the People’s Terms: a Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prozorov, S., 2004. Three theses on ‘governance’ and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7 (3), 267–293. doi:10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIRD.1800023.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., 2010. Reflections on ‘the big society’. Community Development Journal, 46 (1), 132–137. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., 2016. Politics against Domination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shnayderman, R., 2012. Liberal vs. republican notions of freedom. Political Studies, 60 (1), 44–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00900.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 2012. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1984. Foucault on Freedom and Truth. Political Theory, 12 (2), 152–183. doi:10.1177/0090591784012002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. and Ansell, C., 2017. Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19 (1), 37–54. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K., 2016. Michel foucault and the forces of civil society. Theory, Culture and Society, 33 (3), 3–26. doi:10.1177/0263276415581895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R., 2008. Reconciling foucault and skinner on the state: the primacy of politics? History of the Human Sciences, 21 (3), 94–114. doi:10.1177/0952695108093955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., 2015. Institutionalizing freedom as non-domination: democracy and the role of the state. Polity, 47 (4), 508–534. doi:10.1057/pol.2015.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora, D. and Behrent, M.C., eds, 2016. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar