161
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Individually lucky, collectively powerful: a response to friends

Pages 340-362 | Received 21 Jan 2021, Accepted 02 Feb 2021, Published online: 13 May 2021

References

  • Barry, B., ed. 1991. Is it better to be powerful or lucky? In: Democracy and power. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bosworth, W., 2021. Power Obsessed. Journal of Political Power, 14 (2), 288–300.
  • Bosworth, W. and Dowding, K., 2019. The Cambridge school and Kripke: bug detecting with the history of political thought. Review of Politics, 81 (3), 621–642.
  • Brams, S.J., 1976. Paradoxes in politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Clarke, A.C., 2013. Profiles of the future: an inquiry in the limits of the possible. 2nd. London: Gollancz.
  • Crenson, M., 1971. The unpolitics of air pollution. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Davidson, D., 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Davidson, D., 2004. Problems of rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Dennett, D.C., ed. 1998. Real patterns. In: Brainchildren: essays on designing minds. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Dowding, K., 1996. Power. Buckingham: Open University Press/Minnesota University Press.
  • Dowding, K., 2013. The role of political argument in justice as impartiality. Political Studies, 61 (1), 67–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00968.x
  • Dowding, K., 2016a. The philosophy and methods of political science. London: Palgrave.
  • Dowding, K., 2016b. Power and Persuasion. Political Studies, 64 (1S), 4–18. doi:10.1177/0032321715614848
  • Dowding, K., 2017. Power, luck and freedom: collected essays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Dowding, K., 2018. Emotional appeals in politics and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 21 (2), 242–260. doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1196536
  • Dowding, K., 2019. Rational choice and political power: the original text with two new chapters. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Dowding, K., 2020a. Can a case-study test a theory? Types and tokens in social explanation. In: B. Guy Peters and G. Fontaine, eds. Handbook of methods for comparative policy analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, e48–64.
  • Dowding, K. 2021. Why forecast? The value of forecasting to political science. PS Political Science and Politics. 54 (1), 104–106. 10.1017/S104909652000133X, Firstview.
  • Dowding, K., 2021a. Power: ambiguous not vague. Journal of Political Power, 14 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2021.1876997
  • Dowding, K., 2021b. Process tracing: causation and levels of analysis. In: H. Kincaid and J. Van Bouwel, eds. Oxford handbook of the philosophy of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dowding, K. and Bosworth, W., 2021. Ambiguity and vagueness in political terminology: on coding and referential vacuity. European Journal of Political Theory, 20 (2), 335–354. doi:10.1177/1474885118771256
  • Dowding, K. and Miller, C., 2019. On prediction in political science. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (3), 1003–1021. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12319
  • Dowding, K. and Van Hees, M., 2007. Counterfactual success and negative freedom. Economics and Philosophy, 23 (1), 141–162. doi:10.1017/S0266267107001344
  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M., 1998. The measurement of voting power. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Gallie, W.B., 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1), 167–198. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
  • Gelfert, A., 2014. A critical introduction to testimony. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Goodman, N., 1958. Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., and Kuhl, P., 1999. How babies think. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
  • Hartman, S., 1999. Models and stories in Hadron physics. In: M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison, eds. Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 326–346.
  • Hindmoor, A. and McGeechan, J., 2013. Luck, systematic luck and business power: lucky all the way down or trying hard to get what it wants without trying. Political Studies, 61 (4), 834–850. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00981.x
  • Holler, M.J. and Widgrén, M., 1999. The value of a coalition is power. Homo Oeconomicus, 15 (4), 497–511.
  • Johnson, J., 2021. Grumpy old men: reconsidering rational choice and political power. Journal of Political Power, 14 (2), 313–323.
  • Kripke, S., 1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Ladyman, J. and Ross, D., 2007. Every thing must go. with D. Spurrett and J. Collier. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view: the original text with two major new chapters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lukes, S., 2021. Power and rational choice. Journal of Political Power, 14 (2), 281–287.
  • Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. 2nd. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Pansardi, P., 2021. Why we do need a concept of power. Journal of Political Power, 14 (2), 301–312.
  • Pritchard, D., 2004. The epistemology of testimony. Philosophical Issues, 14 (1), 326–348. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00033.x
  • Ross, D., 2000. Rainforest realism: a Dennettian theory of existence. In: D. Ross, A. Brook, and D. Thompson, eds. Dennett’s philosophy: a comprehensive assessment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 147–168.
  • Sen, A., 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
  • Wetzel, L., 2009. Types and tokens: on abstract objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Whitfield, G., 2020. On the concept of political manipulation. European Journal of Political Theory. online first, 147488512093225. doi:10.1177/1474885120932253.
  • Whitfield, G., 2021. Two puzzles for shared-reason accounts of persuasion. Journal of Political Power, 14 (2), 324–339.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.