References
- Anchor, R. (1978). History and play: Huizinga and his critics. History and Theory, 17(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504901
- Blackstone, W. (1768). Commentaries on the laws of England. Clarendon Press.
- Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. University of Illinois Press.
- Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and education. Pennsylvania State University.
- Edwards, J. (2013). Play and democracy: Huizinga and the limits of agonism. Political Theory, 41(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591712463200
- Geyl, P. (1963). Huizinga as accuser of his age. History and Theory, 2(3), 41–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504105
- Gombrich, E. (1973). In E. Heinrich & R. H. Koops (Eds.), Huizinga’s Homo Ludens’ in Johan Huizinga 1872-1972 (pp. 11–40, chapter 2). Nijhoff.
- Henricks, T. (2006). Play reconsidered. University of Illinois Press.
- Howard, M. (1961). The Franco-Prussian War: The German invasion of France 1870-1871. Routledge. 1961.
- Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press.
- Lambrow, A. (2020). The seriousness of play: Johan Huizinga and Carl Schmitt on play and the political. Games and Culture, 1, 36–53.
- Moyn, S. (2011). Concepts of political in twentieth-century European thought. In J. Meierhenrich & O. Simons (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Carl Schmitt (pp. 291–311). Oxford University Press.
- Plato. (1926). Laws VII (Robert Gregg Bury, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
- Schiller, F. (1795/1967). Letters Upon the aesthetic education of Man (Elizabeth Mary Wilkinson, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
- Schmitt, C. (1927/2007). The concept of the political (George Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
- Tanghe, K. (2016). Homo Ludens and the crisis of the humanities. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 3(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1245087
- Wesseling, H. (2002). From cultural historian to cultural critic: Johan Huizinga and the spirit of the 1930s. European Review, 10(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279870200039X