SCUSA: identifying five types of disruption for playful experiences

References

• Araake, K., Kono, M., Iwata, E., & Sasaki, N. (2021). Playful engagement for public spaces: A case study on a mall escalator. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(ISS). https://doi.org/10.1145/3488543
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The semantics of fun: Differentiating enjoyable experiences. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment (pp. 91–100). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_9
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2021). Play and playfulness in Lynda Barry’s what it is. Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 12(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6366
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Moore, J., Kristensson, P. O., Fletcher, P., & Blackwell, A. (2012). I did that! Measuring users’ experience of agency in their own actions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025–2034. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208350
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge University Press. (N.d.). ‘Disruption’. Cambridge Dictionary. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/disruption Assessed May 2nd 2022
   Google Scholar
• Ferland, F. (1997). Play, children with physical disabilities and occupational therapy: The ludic model. University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, J., Umfahrer, M., Theil, A., Buchweitz, L., Lindell, E., Guo, L., Persson, N. K., & Korn, O. (2020). Keep your distance: A playful haptic navigation wearable for individuals with deafblindness. Proceedings of ASSETS 2020. 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418048
   Google Scholar
• Hanington, B. (2017). Design and emotional experience. In M. Jeon (Ed.), Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00006-9
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. M., Alfalah, S., Kwon, J. M., & Kudrowitz, B. (2020). Familiarity trumps playfulness: Exploring children’s preferences for playful design of vegetables. International Journal of Food Design, 5(1–2), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd_00009_1
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, H., Montola, M., & Arrasvuori, J. (2009). Understanding playful user experiences through digital games. Proc. DPPI 2009, ACM Press, 274–285.
   Google Scholar
• Legaard, J. F. (2020). Designing for play(ful) experiences. In S. Gudiksen & H. M. Skovbjerg (Eds.), Framing play design: A hands-on guide for designers, learners and innovators (pp. 49–62). BIS Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Legaard, J. F. (2022). Crispi: A model for designing toys that facilitate immersive play experiences. The International Journal of Designed Objects, 16(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1379/CGP/v16i02/75-87
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, N. J. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, Y. D., Khot, R. A., Patibanda, R., & Mueller, F. F. (2018). “Arm-a-dine”: Towards understanding the design of playful embodied eating experiences. CHI PLAY 2018 – Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs technology and meaning change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, B. (2013). Form follows fun: Modernism and modernity in British Pleasure architecture 1925-1940. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pohlmeyer, A., & Desmet, P. (2017). From good to the greater good. In J. Chapman (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable product design (1st ed., pp. 469–486). Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Proyer, R. T. (2018). Playfulness and humor in psychology: An overview and update. HUMOR, 31(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2011). The virtuousness of adult playfulness: The relation of playfulness with strengths of character. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-1-4
   Google Scholar
• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sicart, M. (2014). Play matters. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ugur Yavuz, S., Veske, P., Scholz, B., Honauer, M., & Kuusk, K. (2021). Design for playfulness with interactive soft materials: Description document. TEI 2021 – Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Li, Z., Jarvis, R. S., Russo, A., Khot, R. A., & Mueller, F. F. (2019). Towards understanding the design of playful gustosonic experiences with ice cream. CHI PLAY 2019 – Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., & Nam, T. J. (2014). Let’s Giggle! Design principles for humorous products. Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS, 275–284.
   Google Scholar