The influence of pretend ‘technologies’ on children’s cognitive development in symbolic play

References

• Arnott, L., & Yelland, N. J. (2020). Multimodal lifeworlds: Pedagogies for play inquiries and explorations. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 9(1), 124–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J. (2020). “You need a phone and camera in your bag before you go out!”: Children’s play with imaginative technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. A., & Laski, E. V. (2019). Digging deeper: Shared deep structures of early literacy and mathematics involve symbolic mapping and relational reasoning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., & Bird, J. (2017). Observing and assessing young children’s digital play in the early years: Using the Digital Play Framework. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15579746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen, J. (2002). Moves in the territory of literacy? The telephone discourse of three- and four-year-olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984020021002
   Google Scholar
• Kravtsov, G. G., & Kravtsova, E. E. (2010). Play in L. S. Vygotsky's nonclassical psychology. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 48(4), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405480403
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Gillen, J. (2019). Young children's digital literacy practices in the home. In O. Erstad, B. Kümmerling-Meibauer, R. Flewitt, & Í. S. Pires Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (Vol. 95, pp. 1–34). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., Johnson, S. K., & Buckingham, M. H. (2015). Relational developmental systems-based theories and the study of children and families: Lerner and Spanier (1978) revisited. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillard, A., Pinkham, A. M., & Smith, E. (2011). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 285–311). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 119(12), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711901206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., & Scott, F. (2016). Digital play: A new classification. Early Years, 36(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1167675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2009). A theory of physically distributed learning: How external environments and internal states interact in mathematics learning. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, L. (1995). A normative study of representational play in the transition to language. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F. (2013). Relationism and relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the post-Cartesian era. In R. Lerner & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 44, pp. 21–57). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-397947-6.00002-7
   Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton, P. C. M. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 9–62). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy102.
   Google Scholar
• Palaiologou, I., Kewalramani, S., & Dardanou, M. (2021). Make-believe play with the Internet of toys: A case for multimodal playscapes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2100–2117. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, Y. B., & Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2020). Enactivism and ecological psychology: The role of bodily experience in agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 539841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.539841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, M., & Araújo, D. (2019). Embodied cognition with and without mental representations: The case of embodied choices in sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindle, E., Apperly, I. A., Beck, S. R., & Tennie, C. (2017). Young children copy cumulative technological design in the absence of action information. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01715-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, C., & Edwards, S. (2017). Young children playing and learning in a digital age: A cultural and critical perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., O’Doherty, K., Newland, R., Hand, L. L., & DeLoache, J. (2009). Dual representation and the linking of concrete and symbolic representations. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., & Yuan, L. (2014). Using symbols: Developmental perspectives. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veraksa, A. N. (2013). Symbol as cognitive tool of mental activity. Psychology in Russia: State of Art, 5(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2013.0105
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040505036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child (V.I. Golod, J.E. Knox, & V.I. Golod, Eds.) (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203772683.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelland, N. (2011). Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 4–12. doi:10.1177/183693911103600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar