1,086
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Don’t you feel bad watching the Olympics, watching us?’ A qualitative analysis of London 2012 Olympics influence on family sports participation and physical activity

&
Pages 45-60 | Received 01 Dec 2014, Accepted 15 May 2015, Published online: 09 Jul 2015

References

  • Alaszewski, A., 2006. Diaries as a source of suffering narratives: a critical commentary. Health, risk and society, 8 (1), 43–58.10.1080/13698570500532553
  • Bates, C., 2015. Intimate encounters: making video diaries about everyday life. In: C. Bates, ed. Video methods social science research in motion. Oxon: Routledge, 10–26.
  • Bijoux, D. and Myers, J., 2006. Interviews, solicited diaries and photography: ‘new’ ways of accessing everyday experiences of place. Journal of Asia-Pacific studies, 4 (1), 44–64.
  • Billings, A.C. and Hardin, M.C., 2013. Megasport in a mega-city to a mega-audience: the impact of 2012 London Olympic media. Mass communication and society, 16 (6), 847–849.10.1080/15205436.2013.852922
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • Carmichael, F., Grix, J., Marqués, D.P., 2013. The Olympic legacy and participation in sport: an interim assessment of sport England’s active people survey for sports studies research. International journal of sport policy and politics, 5 (2), 229–244.10.1080/19406940.2012.656675
  • Carter, R.V. and Lorenc, T., 2013. A qualitative study into the development of a physical activity legacy from the London 2012 Olympic Games. Health promotion international. 19 September 2013. Available from: http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/09/18/heapro.dat066.abstract [Accessed 4 July 2014].
  • Cherrington, J. and Watson, B., 2010. Shooting a diary, not just a hoop: using video diaries to explore the embodied everyday contexts of a university basketball team. Qualitative research in sport and exercise, 2 (2), 267–281.10.1080/19398441.2010.488036
  • Coalter, F., 2004. Stuck in the blocks? A sustainable sporting legacy. In: A. Vigor, M. Mean, and C. Tims, eds. After the gold rush: a sustainable Olympics for London. London: Demos/IPPR, 91–108.
  • Darko, N., 2012. Rugby union men: body concerns. Thesis (PhD). Loughborough University.
  • Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS), 2009. London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games impacts and legacy evaluation framework. London: DCMS.
  • Frawley, S., 2013. Sport participation legacy and the hosting of mega-sport events. In: G. Richards, M. de Brito, and L. Wilks, eds. Exploring the social impacts of events. London: Routledge, 97–110.
  • Gibson, B. E., 2005. Co-producing video diaries: the presence of the “absent” researcher. International journal of qualitative methods, 4 (3), Article 3. Available from: http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/4_4/pdf/gibson.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2014].
  • Gibson, O., 2013. London 2012 Olympic Games legacy questioned as young people shun sport. The guardian, Thurs 12 Dec 2013. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/dec/12/london-2012-olympic-legacy-young-people-shun-sport [Accessed 4 June 2014].
  • Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of the self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.
  • Green, K., 2012. London 2012 and sports participation: the myths of legacy. Significance, June 2012, The Royal Statistical Society.
  • Hawkes, G., Houghton, J., and Rowe, G., 2009. Risk and worry in everyday life: comparing diaries and interviews as tools in risk perception research. Health, risk & society, 11 (3), 209–230.
  • Holliday, R., 2004. Reflecting the self. In: P. Sweetman and C. Knowles, eds. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods and the sociological imagination. London: Routledge, 46–49.
  • Horne, J. and Whannel, G., 2012. Understanding the Olympics. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Jewitt, C., 2012. An introduction to using video, National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper 03/12. National Centre for Research Methods. London: Institute of Education.
  • Jones, R.L., et al., 2014. The promise and problems of video diaries: building on current research. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2014.938687 [Accessed 25 September 2014].
  • Kennelly, J. and Watt, P., 2012. Seeing Olympic effects through the eyes of marginally housed youth: changing places and the gentrification of East London. Visual studies, 27 (2), 151–160.10.1080/1472586X.2012.677496
  • Lincoln, S. 2012. Youth culture and private space. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137031082
  • Lines, G., 2001. Villains, fools or heroes? Sports stars as role models for young people. Leisure studies, 20 (4), 285–303.
  • Mackintosh, C., et al., 2014. A qualitative study of the impact of the London 2012 Olympics on families in the East Midlands of England: lessons for sports development policy and practice. Sport, education and society. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.881337 [Accessed 28 September 2014].
  • Mason, J., 2002. Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
  • Morley, D., 1986. Family television, cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Routledge.
  • Murray, L., 2009. Looking at and looking back: visualization in mobile research. Qualitative research, 9, 469–488.10.1177/1468794109337879
  • Murthy, D., 2008. Digital ethnography: an examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42 (5), 837–855.10.1177/0038038508094565
  • Phoenix, C. and Smith, B., eds., 2011. The world of physical culture in sport and exercise, visual methods for qualitative research. London: Routledge.
  • Pink, S., 2013. Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
  • Plowman, L. and Stevenson, O., 2012. Using mobile phone diaries to explore children’s everyday lives. Childhood, 19 (4), 539–553.10.1177/0907568212440014
  • Rose, G., 2007. Visual methodologies: an introduction to interpreting visual materials. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Saldaña, J., 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
  • Silk, M., 2011. Towards a sociological analysis of London 2012. Sociology, 45 (5), 733–748.10.1177/0038038511413422
  • Smith, B. and Caddick, N., 2012. Qualitative methods in sport: a concise overview for guiding social scientific sport research. Asia Pacific journal of sport and social science, 1 (1), 60–73.10.1080/21640599.2012.701373
  • Smith, B. and Sparkes, A., 2013. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: from process to product. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Sport England, 2012. Places people play – delivering a mass participation sporting legacy from the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Available from: http://archive.sportengland.org/about_us/places_people_play.aspx [Accessed 6 April 2014].
  • Sport England, Active People Survey, 7 Q2–8 Q2 2013–2014. Sport participation factsheet: summary of results for England, April 2012 – April 2013. London: Sport England.
  • Tang, T. and Cooper, R., 2013. Olympics everywhere: predictors of multiplatform media uses during the 2012 London Olympics. Mass communication and society, 16 (6), 850–868.10.1080/15205436.2013.804936
  • The Telegraph, 2011. London 2012 Olympics: Lord Coe rejects criticism of ‘legacy’ planning. The Telegraph, 24 May 2011. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/8534433/London-2012-Olympics-Lord-Coe-rejects-criticism-of-legacy-planning.html [Accessed 28 April 2014].
  • Veal, A.J., 2003. Tracking change: leisure participation and policy in Australia, 1985–2002. Annals of leisure research, 6 (3), 245–277.
  • Veal, A.J., Toohey, K., and Frawley, S., 2012. The sport participation legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games and other international sporting events hosted in Australia. Journal of policy research in tourism, leisure and events, 4 (2), 155–184.10.1080/19407963.2012.662619
  • Weed, M., Coren, E., and Fiore, J., 2009. A systematic review of the evidence base for developing a physical activity and health legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Canterbury. Canterbury: Centre for Sport, Physical Education & Activity Research (SPEAR), Canterbury Christ Church University.
  • Würfel, G., 2012. Go for gold!. Visual studies, 27 (2), 141–147.10.1080/1472586X.2012.677279

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.