Shifting power relations in disability sport and social activism research: an emancipatory approach

References

• Barnes, Colin. 1996. “Disability and the Myth of the Independent Researcher.” Disability & Society 11 (1): 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Colin. 2002. “‘Emancipatory Disability research’: Project or Process?” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2 (1): no–no. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2002.00157.x.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Colin. 2007. “Disability Activism and the Struggle for Change: Disability, Policy and Politics in the UK.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 2 (3): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197907081259.
   Google Scholar
• Beddard, Jamie. 2012. “The Race to Mainstream Acceptance”. In Cultural Shifts:A Collection of Essays About Disability, Success, Art, Sport and the Influence of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Edited by Camilla Brueton and Esther Fox. An Accentuate Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, Peter. 2021. Participatory Ideology: From Exclusion to Involvement. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berghs, Maria, Tsitsi Chataika, Yahya El-Lahib, Kudakwashe Dube, M. Berghs, T. Chataika, Y. El-Lahib, and K. Dube. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Disability Activism. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351165082.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 11 (4): 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braye, Stuart. 2016. ““‘I’m Not an activist’: An Exploratory Investigation into Retired British Paralympic athletes’ Views on the Relationship Between the Paralympic Games and Disability Equality in the United Kingdom.” Disability & Society 31 (9): 1288–1300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1251392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braye, Stuart. 2017. ““You Shall Not murder”: Atos at the Paralympic Games.” Journal of Disability & Religion 21 (2): 215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Braye, Stuart, Kevin Dixon, and Tom Gibbons. 2013. “‘A Mockery of equality’: An Exploratory Investigation into Disabled activists’ Views of the Paralympic Games.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 984–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.748648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain, Ian, and Aaron Beacom. 2016. “Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: What Legacy for Disabled People?” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 40 (6): 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723516655580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Inhyang, Damian Haslett, and Brett Smith. 2019. “Disabled Athlete Activism in South Korea: A Mixed-Method Study.” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 19 (4): 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2019.1674903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, Ellen. 2020. The War on Disabled People: Capitalism, Welfare and the Making of a Human Catastrophe. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350225732.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. 2017. Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Hayley. 2009. “Are You a ‘Parasite’ Researcher? Researching Disability and Youth Sport.” In Disability and Youth Sport, edited by Hayley Fitzgerald, 157–171. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2016. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan, and Michele Moore. 2000. “Doing disability research: Activist lives and the academy.” Disability & Society 15 (6): 861–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Miro. 2022a. “Disabled Youth Participation within Activism and Social Movement Bases: An Empirical Investigation of the UK Disabled People’s Movement.” Current Sociology 001139212211005. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921221100579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Miro. 2022b. “UK Social Model of Disability and the Quest for Emancipation.” In Handbook of Disability, edited by Marcia Rioux, Jose Viera, Alexis Buettgen, and Ezra Zubrow, 1–15. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haslett, Damian. 2023. “Addressing Power Dynamics in Disability Sport Studies: Emancipatory Participatory Principles for Social Justice Research.” In Routledge Handbook of Sport, Leisure and Justice, edited by Stefan Lawrence, Rasul Mowatt, and Joanne Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Haslett, Damian, and Brett Smith. 2022. “Disability, Sport and Social Activism.” In Athlete Activism: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Rory Magrath, 65–76. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003140290-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Brian. 2009. “Disability Activisms: Social Model Stalwarts and Biological Citizens.” Disability & Society 24 (6): 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903160118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPC. 2019. “International Paralympic Committee Strategic Plan 2019 to 2022.” https://www.paralympic.org/
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Travis Chi Wing. 2019. “Slowness, Disability, and Academic Productivity: The Need to Rethink Academic Culture.” In Disability at the University: A Disabled Students’ Manifesto, edited by Peter Lang, 11–19. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Liddiard, Kirsty, Katherine Runswick‐Cole, Dan Goodley, Sally Whitney, Emma Vogelmann, and M. B. E. Lucy Watts. 2019. ““I Was Excited by the Idea of a Project That Focuses on Those Unasked questions” Co‐Producing Disability Research with Disabled Young People.” Children & Society 33 (2): 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, Jessica. 2010. “Reflecting on Disability Research in Sport and Leisure Settings.” Leisure Studies 29 (4): 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2010.523834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrath, Rory. 2022. Athlete Activism: Contemporary Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003140290.
   Google Scholar
• McColl, Mary Ann, William Adair, Sue Davey, and Nick Kates. 2013. “The Learning Collaborative: An Approach to Emancipatory Research in Disability Studies.” Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 2 (1): 71–93. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v2i1.71.
   Google Scholar
• Mietola, Reetta, Sonja Miettinen, and Simo Vehmas. 2017. “Voiceless Subjects? Research Ethics and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (3): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1287872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIRH. 2020. “A Map of Resources for Co-Producing Research in Health and Social Care: A Guide for Researchers, Members of the Public and Health and Social Care Practitioners.” Version 1.2. https://arc-w.nihr.ac.uk/Wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Map-of-resources-Web-version-v1.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NIRH. 2021. “Briefing Notes for Researchers – Public Involvement in NHS, Heath and Social Care Researcher.” In Retrieved: Briefing Notes for Researchers - Public Involvement in NHS, Health and Social Care Research. NIHR.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years on.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappous, Athanasios, and Chris Brown. 2018. “Paralympic Legacies: A Critical Perspective.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies, edited by Ian Brittain and A. Beacom, 647–664. London: Palgrave Macmillian. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-3_29.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, Danielle. 2018. “Sport and Social Movements by and for Disability and Deaf Communities: Important Differences in Self-Determination, Politicisation, and Activism.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies, edited by Ian Brittain and A. Beacom, 71–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Paula Campos. 2019. “When Academia Meets Activism: The Place of Research in Struggles for Disability Rights.” In Global Perspectives on Disability Activism and Advocacy: Our Way, edited by Karen Soldatic and Kelley Johnson, 315–327. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powis, Ben, James Brighton, and P. David Howe. 2023. “Researching Disability Sport: Theory, Method, Practice”. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003153696.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, Leanne, Priscilla Robinson, and Nora Shields. 2019. “Media Portrayal of Elite Athletes with Disability - a Systematic Review.” Disability and Rehabilitation 41 (4): 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1397775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2014. “Psycho-Emotional Disablism and Internalised Oppression.” In Disabling Barriers - Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas, 92–98. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, Lesley, Janine Coates, and Carolynne Mason. 2022. “Participatory Research with Young People with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities: A Reflective Account.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 14 (3): 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2021.1952297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, Margrit. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In Handbook to Disability Studies, edited by Nock Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas, 30–41. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Brett, and Andrea Bundon. 2018. “Disability Models: Explaining and Understanding Disability Sport in Different Ways.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies, edited by Ian Brittain and A. Beacom, 15–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Brett, Andrea Bundon, and Melanie Best. 2016. “Disability Sport and Activist Identities: A Qualitative Study of Narratives of Activism Among Elite Athletes with Impairment.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 26:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Brett, Kerry R. McGannon, Mike Atkinson, and the Moving Social Work Co-production. Collective. 2023. “Advancing Participatory Approaches to Co-Production, Co-Design, and Community Based-Research in Sport, Exercise and Health: A Curated Collection of Contemporary Views.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 15 (2): 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2052946.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Brett, Oli Williams, Lydia Bone, the Moving Social Work Co-production. Collective, and and the Moving Social Work Co-production Collective. 2022. “Co-Production: A Resource to Guide Co-Producing Research in the Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 15 (2): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2052946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldatic, Karen, Kelley Johnson, K. Soldatic, and K. Johnson. 2019. Global Perspectives on Disability Activism and Advocacy: Our Way. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351237499.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Nancy, and Győző Molnár. 2022. “Whose Knowledge Counts? Examining Paradigmatic Trends in Adapted Physical Activity Research.” Quest 74 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.2021258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Emma, and Mark Priestley. 1996. “Parasites, Pawns and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-Disabled Researchers.” The British Journal of Sociology 47 (4): 699–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/591081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 2014. “Disability and Impairment.” In Disabling Barriers - Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zarb, Gerry. 1992. “On the Road to Damascus: First Steps Towards Changing the Relations of Disability Research Production.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780161.
   Google Scholar