Complexity, Knowledge Politics and the Remaking of Class: Response to Levins

References

• Amin, A. 2013. “Surviving the Turbulent Future.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (1): 140–56. doi: 10.1068/d23011
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2006. “Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror.” Political Geography 25 (3): 336–51. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–98. doi: 10.1177/0309132510362600
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and P. Adey. 2011. “Affect and Security: Exercising Emergency in ‘UK Civil Contingencies.’” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (6): 1092–109. doi: 10.1068/d14110
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2013. “Why ‘Class’ Is Too Soft a Category to Capture the Explosiveness of Social Inequality at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century.” British Journal of Sociology 64 (1): 63–74. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12005
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breman, J. 2013. “A Bogus Concept.” New Left Review 84: 130–38.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and T. McAfee. 2011. Race against the Machine. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K. 2010. “The Second Modern Condition? Compressed Modernity as Internalized Reflexive Cosmopolitanism.” British Journal of Sociology 61 (3): 444–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01321.x
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 1982. Marx, Marginalism, and Modern Sociology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, T. 2011. The Great Stagnation. New York: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, D. 2013a. “Risk Society and the Distribution of Bads: Theorizing Class in the Risk Society.” British Journal of Sociology 64 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12004
   Google Scholar
• Curran, D. 2013b. “What Is a Critical Theory of the Risk Society? Reply to Beck.” British Journal of Sociology 64 (1): 75–80. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12006
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 2007. “Anthropocene Geopolitics: Globalisation, Empire, Environment and Critique.” Geography Compass 1 (1): 103–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd ed., edited by H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–26. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004. Society Must Be Defended. Translated by D. Macey. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2009. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2010. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S., and Y. Shim. 2010. “Redefining Second Modernity for East Asia.” British Journal of Sociology 61 (3): 465–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01322.x
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2013. “Revisiting the Regulation Approach: Critical Reflections on the Contradictions, Dilemmas, Fixes and Crisis Dynamics of Growth Regimes.” Capital & Class 37 (1): 5–24. doi: 10.1177/0309816812472968
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and N. Sum. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2013. “Facing Gaia: Six Lectures on the Political Theology of Nature.” http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/GIFFORD-SIX-LECTURES_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lentzos, F., and N. Rose. 2009. “Governing Insecurity: Contingency Planning, Protection, Resilience.” Economy & Society 38 (2): 230–54. doi: 10.1080/03085140902786611
   Google Scholar
• Levins, R. 2014. “The Road to Wholeness in Medicine and Public Health.” International Critical Thought 4 (2): 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Losurdo, D. 2010. Liberalism: A Counter-History. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1845. “The German Ideology.” http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01b.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2012. “The Biopolitics of Biosphere Complexity: Neoliberal vs. Cyborg Markets.” Paper presented at the First Annual Workshop on the Changing Political Economy of Research & Innovation, Lancaster, October 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. D. 2008. Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oels, A. 2013. “Rendering Climate Change Governable by Risk: From Probability to Contingency.” Geoforum 45: 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2011. “Governing through Disorder: Neoliberal Environmental Governance and Social Theory.” Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 795–803. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.014
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 2012. The Price of Inequality. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. 2007. The Black Swan. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2014. “Climate Change Is an Issue of National Security, Warns Ed Miliband.” February 16. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/15/ed-miliband-stark-warning-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D. 2012a. The Economics of Science: A Critical Realist Overview. 2 vols. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D. 2012b. “A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis.” Minerva 50 (2): 149–67. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D. 2013. “Transition to Science 2.0: ‘Remoralizing’ the Economy of Science.” Spontaneous Generations 7 (1). https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/article/view/19664.
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D. Forthcoming. Liberalism 2.0 and the New Nineteenth Century: Innovation, China and the Crises of Neoliberalism.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J., ed. 2005. “Complexity.” Special issue, Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 1–274.
   Google Scholar