What Is Political Science and What Should It Be?

References

• Almond, G. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (4): 828–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., M. Jewell, and L. Sigelman, eds. 1991. Political Science in America: Oral Histories of a Discipline. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. W. 2008. “The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science.” New Political Science 30 (2): 215–44. doi: 10.1080/07393140802082598
   Google Scholar
• Beard, C. 1948. “Neglected Aspects of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 42 (April): 211–22. doi: 10.2307/1949728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bren, P., and M. Neuburger. 2012. Communism Unwrapped: Consumption in Cold War Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, E. 2013. “The Art of Not Being Quite So Governed: An Examination of the Work of the ‘Critical’ Journal.” New Political Science 35 (3): 507–21. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2013.813702
   Google Scholar
• Cumings, B. 1998. “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during and after the Cold War.” In Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War, edited by C. Simpson, 159–88. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1961. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55 (4): 763–72. doi: 10.2307/1952525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisfeld, R., and L. A. Pal. 2010. “Political Science in Central-East Europe and the Impact of Politics: Factors of Diversity, Forces of Convergence.” European Political Science 9: 223–43. doi: 10.1057/eps.2010.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. 1980. “American Philanthropy and the Social Sciences: The Reproduction of a Conservative Ideology.” In Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism, edited by R. Arnove, 233–68. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. 2008. “Revisionism in Retrospect: A Personal View.” Slavic Review 67 (3): 682–704. doi: 10.2307/27652945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosdick, R. 1952. The Story of the Rockefeller Foundation. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Gatti de Gamond, M. 1842. Fourier and His System. Translated by C. T. Wood. London: J. H. Young.
   Google Scholar
• Gendzier, I. 1998. “Play It Again Sam: The Practice and Apology of Development.” In Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War, edited by C. Simpson, 57–95. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel, E. W. 2014. “The Golden Mean and the Golden Hammer: Phronesis and Method in Contemporary Political Science.” Polity 46 (2): 274–95. doi: 10.1057/pol.2014.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, A. 1959. “Political Behaviour and Political Behavior.” Political Studies 7 (February): 39–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1959.tb00890.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. 1969. “Sinews of Empire.” Ramparts, October: 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, B. D. 1985. “Philanthropy and the Social Sciences.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 129 (1): 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. 1982. “Another State of Mind.” American Political Science Review 76: 9–21. doi: 10.2307/1960438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, N., and M. Mattern. 2013. “Introduction: Studying Politics Today: Critical Approaches to Political Science.” New Political Science 35 (3): 335–38. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2013.813683
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T., and P. J. Mcgoven. 2010. “The Rebels’ Yell: Mr. Perestroika and the Causes of This Rebellion in Context.” Political Sciences and Politics 43 (4): 729–31. doi: 10.1017/S1049096510001174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, R. (1915) 2009. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• President's Research Committee on Social Trends. (1933) 1970. Recent Social Trends in the United States, vol. 2. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, J. 2003. Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, J. 2008. “Welcome to the Dark Ages.” Theory in Action 1 (4). http://www.transformativestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/103798tia1937-0237080161.pdf. doi: 10.3798/tia.1937-0237.08016
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2014. “Human Well-Being and the Lost Relevance of Political Science.” http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31262/MWP_LS_Rothstein_2014_03.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., B. Flyvbjerg, and T. Landman. 2013. “Political Political Science: A Phronetic Approach.” New Political Science 35 (3): 359–72. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2013.813687
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. M. 2013. “A Peculiar Blind Spot: Why did Radical Political Theory Ignore the Rampant Rise in Inequality over the Past Thirty Years?” New Political Science 35 (3): 389–402. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2013.813691
   Google Scholar
• Seidelman, R., and E. Harpham. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis: 1884–1984. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seybold, P. 1982. “The Ford Foundation and Social Control.” Science for the People, no. May/June: 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, C. 1998. Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somit, A., and J. Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of American Political Science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. 2010. “Should Political Science Be More Relevant?” Paper presented at the annual conference for the International Studies Association, New Orleans, February 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. 1954. Tax-Exempt Foundations: Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations, House of Representatives, 83rd Congress Second Session. Washington DC: US Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, B. 2012. “When the Past Is Not Prologue: The Wagner Act Debates and the Limits of American Political Science.” New Political Science 34 (3): 338–57. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2012.703854
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2012. “Emancipatory Politics, Emancipatory Political Science: On Erik Olin Wright's Envisioning Real Utopias.” New Political Science 34 (3): 386–95. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2012.703860
   Google Scholar