Personal Freedom without Private Property? Hegel, Marx, and the Frankfurt School

References

• Brudney, D. 2010. “Producing for Others.” In The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by H.-C. Schmidt am Busch and C. F. Zurn, 151–88. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, D. 2013. “Two Types of Friendship.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4): 729–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1979. “Überlegungen zum evolutionären Stellenwert des modernen Rechts” [Reflections on the evolutionary status of modern law]. In Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus [Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism], by J. Habermas, 260–67. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Translated by F. Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1988. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Philosophische Aufsätze [Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardimon, M. O. 1994. Hegel's Social Philosophy. The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1970. Werke 7: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts [Works 7: Elements of the philosophy of right]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by A. Wood , translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by J. Anderson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2003. “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, by N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 110–97. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014. Freedom's Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by J. Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 1999. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Critical Theory: Selected Essays, edited by M. J. O'Connell, 188–243. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. M. 1980. Das Prinzip Arbeit. Drei metakritische Kapitel über die Grundbegriffe, Struktur und Darstellung der “Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie” von Karl Marx [Work as a principle: Three meta-critical chapters on the basic concepts, structure and presentation of the “Critique of Political Economy” by Karl Marx]. Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1975a. “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844.” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Collected Works, vol. 3, 229–348. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1975b. “On the Jewish Question.” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Collected Works, vol. 3, 146–74. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Menke, C. 2012. Recht und Gewalt [Law and violence]. Berlin: August Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Menke, C. 2013. “Die ‘andre’ Form der Herrschaft. Recht und Gesellschaft” [The “other” form of domination: Law and society]. In Der Ausnahmezustand als Regel [The state of emergency as a rule], edited by R. Schmidt-Grépály, J. Urbich, and C. Wirsing, 96–112. Weimar: Verlag der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar.
   Google Scholar
• Mohseni, A. 2014. Abstrakte Freiheit. Zum Begriff des Eigentums bei Hegel [Abstract freedom: The concept of property in Hegel]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Munzer, S. R. 1990. A Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhouser, F. 2000. Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, M. 2004. Hegel's Concept of Action. Translated by D. Moyar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, M. 2011. “Recognition as the Social Grammar of Species Being in Marx.” In Recognition and Social Ontology, edited by H. Ikäheimo and A. Laitinen, 239–67. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, M. 2014. “Das gegenständliche Gattungswesen. Bemerkungen über den intrinsischen Wert menschlicher Dependenz” [Species being: Remarks about the intrinsic value of human dependency]. In Nach Marx. Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis [After Marx: Philosophy, criticism, practice], edited by R. Jaeggi and D. Loick, 69–86. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. 2011. “Anerkennung” als Prinzip der Kritischen Theorie [“Recognition” as a principle of critical theory]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. 2013. “‘The Egg of Columbus?’ How Fourier's Social Theory Exerted a Significant (and Problematic) Influence on the Formation of Marx's Anthropology and Social Critique.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (6): 1154–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. 2014: “Welchen normativen Status hat das Privatrecht? Zu Jürgen Habermas’ Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus” [What is the normative status of private law? Jürgen Habermas's reconstuction of historical materialism]. In Habermas und der Historische Materialismus [Habermas and historical materialism], edited by S. Rapic, 275–94, with a reply by J. Habermas, 294–95. Freiburg, Munich: Alber.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. 2002. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar