State, Emancipation and the Rise of China

References

• Alway, J. 1995. Critical Theory and Political Possibilities: Conceptions of Emancipatory Politics in the Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, and Habermas. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Arato, A., and P. Breines. 1979. The Young Lukacs and the Origins of Western Marxism. New York, NY: Seabury.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. K. 1987. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 12 (4): 403–434. doi: 10.1177/030437548701200401
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. W. 1993. Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. 1978. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeley, R. 2013. “Human Rights, State Wrongs, and Social Change: The Theory and Practice of Emancipation.” Review of International Studies 39 (3): 599–619. doi: 10.1017/S0260210512000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. 2013. “The Harm Principle and Recognition Theory: On the Complementarity between Linklater, Honneth and the Project of Emancipation.” Critical Horizons 14 (2): 225–256. doi: 10.1179/1440991713Z.0000000001
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1979. “The State’s Positive Role in World Affairs.” Daedalus 108 (4): 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Radio International. 2016. “Is A Sino-US Currency War Imminent?” Accessed January 5, 2017. http://english.cri.cn/6909/2014/01/28/53s810456.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A., R. Veryard, D. H. Mellor, A. G. M. Last, R. Quirk, and J. Mason. 1986. “Historical Inevitability and Human Agency in Marxism [and Discussion].” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 407 (1832): 65–87. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1986.0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1999. “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millenium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order.” Review of International Studies 25 (1): 3–28. doi: 10.1017/S0260210599000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economy, E. C., and A. Segal. 2009. “The G-2 Mirage: Why the United States and China Are Not Ready to Upgrade Ties.” Foreign Affairs 88 (3): 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1902. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Chicago, IL: Kerr.
   Google Scholar
• Farrands, C., and O. Worth. 2005. “Critical Theory in Global Political Economy: Critique? Knowledge? Emancipation?” Capital & Class 29 (1): 43–61. doi: 10.1177/030981680508500113
   Google Scholar
• Fay, B. 1987. Critical Social Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feinerman, J. V. 1995. “Chinese Participation in the International Legal Order: Rogue Elephant or Team Player?” The China Quarterly 141: 186–210. doi: 10.1017/S0305741000032963
   Google Scholar
• Fifield, R. H. 1958. “The Five Principles of Peaceful Co-Existence.” American Journal of International Law 52 (3): 504–510. doi: 10.1017/S0002930000190141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Girardin, J. C. 1974. “On the Marxist Theory of the State.” Politics and Society 4 (2): 193–223. doi: 10.1177/003232927400400204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. 1996. “Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-Reflection, Rational Argumentation.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25 (2): 255–289. doi: 10.1177/03058298960250020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. “Knowledge and Human Interests: A General Perspective.” In Knowledge and Human Interests, Translated by J. J. Shapiro, 301–317. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1984. Political Theory and the Modern State. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 1968. Gulliver’s Troubles, or the Setting of American Foreign Policy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 2002. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York, NY: The Continuum Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. 1989. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” In International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, edited by R. Keohane, 158–179. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Kompridis, N. 2006. “Disclosing Possibility: The Past and Future of Critical Theory.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3): 325–351. doi: 10.1080/09672550500169125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1992. “Beyond Emancipation.” Development and Change 23 (3): 121–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Baron, B. 1971. “Marx on Human Emancipation.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 4 (4): 559–570. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900030043
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. 1990. Critical Theory in Political Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, A. 1987. The End of the State. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1973. “On the Philosophical Foundation of the Concept of Labor in Economics.” Telos 1973 (16): 9–37. doi: 10.3817/0673016009
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H., and F. Neumann. 1994. “A History of the Doctrine of Social Change.” Constellations 1 (1): 116–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00008.x
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. 1997. “Plekhanov, Lenin and Working-Class Consciousness.” Studies in East European Thought 49 (3): 159–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1017952306992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peoples, C. 2011. “Security After Emancipation? Critical Theory, Violence and Resistance.” Review of International Studies 37 (3): 1113–1135. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, P. B. 2007. “China and the International Legal System: Challenges of Participation.” The China Quarterly 191: 699–715. doi: 10.1017/S0305741007001671
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, D. M. 1996. “Critical Theory and Philosophy.” In The Handbook of Critical Theory, edited by D. M. Rasmussen, 11–39. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rengger, N., and B. Thirkell-White. 2007. “Still Critical After All These Years? The Past, Present and Future of Critical Theory in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 33 (S1): 3–24. doi: 10.1017/S0260210507007371
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, A. 1987. Theories of the State. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2014. “Exploring the Path of Major-Country Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics.” Speech by Wang Yi, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Peoples’ Republic of China, June 27, 2013. In Interpretation on New Philosophy of Chinese Diplomacy, edited by M. Zhang, 15–28. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheim, W. F. 1992. “The State and the Dialectics of Emancipation.” Development and Change 23 (3): 257–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 1993. “Class Analysis, History and Emancipation.” New Left Review I/202 (November–December): 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Z. C. 2014. “President Xi Jinping’s Nine New Concepts of Diplomacy.” In Interpretation on New Philosophy of Chinese Diplomacy, edited by M. Zhang, 92–124. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
   Google Scholar