Party politics after the colour revolutions: party institutionalisation and democratisation in Ukraine and Georgia

References

• Areshidze, I. 2007. Democracy and Autocracy in Eurasia. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslund, A. 2005. “The Economic Policy of Ukraine after the Orange Revolution.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (5): 327–353. doi: 10.2747/1538-7216.46.5.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M. 2010. Against All Odds: Aiding Political Parties in Georgia and Ukraine. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheterian, V. 2008. “Georgia's Rose Revolution: Change or Repetition? Tension Between State Building and Modernization Projects.” Nationalities Papers 36 (4): 689–712. doi: 10.1080/00905990802230530
   Google Scholar
• D'Anieri, P. 2007. Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics, and Institutional Design. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• D'Anieri, P. 2011. “Structural Constraints in Ukrainian Politics.” East European Politics in Society 25 (1): 28–46. doi: 10.1177/0888325410388559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorosh, S. 2012. “Yatsenyuk primeryaet ‘nomer v spiske’ Timoshenko [Yatsenyuk tries out a place on Tymoshenko's list].” BBC Ukrainian, March 30. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ukrainian/ukraine_in_russian/2012/03/120330_ru_s_opposition_union_election.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. H. 2007. “Revolution Reconsidered.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 42–57. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, A., and E. Martinez Kuhonta. 2011. “Shadows from the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (5): 572–597. doi: 10.1177/0010414010396460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kis, O. 2007. “Beauty Will Save the World!: Feminine Strategies in Ukrainian Politics and the Case of Yulia Tymoshenko.” Spaces of Identity 7 (2): 31–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kovryzhenko, D. 2010. Regulation of Political Parties in Ukraine: The Current State and Direction of Reforms. Kyiv: Agency for Legislative Initiatives, OSCE/ODIHR.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. 2008. “Ukraine's Orange Evolution.” Current History 107 (707): 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2005. “The Opposition's Road to Success.” Journal of Democracy 16 (2): 117–130. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2007. “Oligarchs, Tapes and Oranges: ‘Kuchmagate’ to the Orange Revolution.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23 (1): 30–56. doi: 10.1080/13523270701194839
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2010. “Populism in Ukraine in a Comparative European Context.” Problems of Post-Communism 57 (6): 3–18. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216570601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2011. “Political Culture and Democracy: Ukraine as an Immobile State.” East European Politics and Society 25 (1): 88–113. doi: 10.1177/0888325410388410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., and T. R. Scully. 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, edited by S. Mainwaring and T. R. Scully, 1–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., and M. Torcal. 2005. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. Working Paper 319. Kellogg Institute, Notre Dame, South Bend, IN. http://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/319.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., and M. Torcal. 2006. “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization.” In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by R. S. Katz and W. Crotty, 204–227. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McFaul, M. 2007. “Ukraine Imports Democracy: External influences on the Orange Revolution.” International Security 32 (2): 45–83. doi: 10.1162/isec.2007.32.2.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meleshevich, A. 2006. “Geographical Patterns of Party Support in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine.” European Urban and Regional Studies 13 (2): 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnykovska, I., and R. Schweickert. 2008. Who You Gonna Call? – Oligarchic Clans as a Bottom-Up Force of Neighborhood Europeanization in Ukraine. Berlin, Germany: Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts Der Freien Universitat Berlin, Germany. http://www.oei.fu-berlin.de/politik/publikationen/AP_67.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. A. 2006. “Democracy in Georgia since the Rose Revolution.” Orbis 50 (4): 669–676.
   Google Scholar
• Motyl, A. 2010. “Ukrainian Blues.” Foreign Affairs, July/August, 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Muskhelishvili, M., and G. Jorjoliani. 2009. “Georgia's Ongoing Struggle for a Better Future Continued: Democracy Promotion Through Civil Society Development.” Democratization 16 (4): 682–708. doi: 10.1080/13510340903083000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodia, G., and A. P. Scholtbach. 2006. Political Landscape of Georgia. Delft: Eburon Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pattie, N. 2012. “Campaigning in Ukraine's 2012 Parliamentary Election.” Ridge Consulting Ltd Special Report.
   Google Scholar
• Political Parties in Georgia: Issues of Party Financing. 2008. “Transparency International.” Accessed January 12, 2012. http://www.investmentguide.ge/files/22_10_223461_PoliticalPartiesinGeorgia,IssueofPartyFinancing-E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Power, T. 1997. “Parties, Puppets, and Paradoxes: Changing Attitudes toward Party Institutionalization in Post-Authoritarian Brazil.” Party Politics 3 (2): 189–219.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, V., and L. Svasand. 2002. “Party Institutionalization in New Democracies.” Party Politics 8 (1): 5–29. doi: 10.1177/1354068802008001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razumkov Centre. 2009. “Political Corruption as a Phenomenon: Approaches to Definition.” National Security and Defence 7. http://www.razumkov.org.ua/eng/journal.php?y=2009&cat=150
   Google Scholar
• Razumkov Centre. 2010. “Ukraine's Party System: Establishment, Functioning, Development.” National Security and Defence 5. http://www.razumkov.org.ua/eng/journal.php?y=2010&cat=156
   Google Scholar
• Riabchuk, M. 2008. “Ukraine: Lessons Learned from Other Post-communist Transition.” Orbis Winter: 41–63. doi: 10.1016/j.orbis.2007.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 1995. “Under and Overinstitutionalization.” The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Accessed January 13, 2012. http://nd.edu/∼kellogg/publications/workingpapers/WPS/213.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 1998. “What is Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 91–107. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenova, E. 2012. “Patterns of Parliamentary Representation and Careers in Ukraine: 1990–2007.” East European Politics and Societies 26 (3): 538–560.
   Google Scholar
• Sidikov, B. 2004. “New or Traditional? ‘Clans’, Regional Groupings, and State in Post-Soviet Azerbaijan.” Berliner Osteuropa Info 21: 68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Socor, V. 2013. “Georgian Dream Seizes Local Administrations from Elected UNM Incumbents.” Eurasia Daily Monitor 10 (63). http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=40688&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=685&no_cache=1#.Ugtl3hbU9UQ
   Google Scholar
• Stefes, C. 2008. “Governance, the State, and Systemic Corruption: Armenia and Georgia in Comparison.” Caucasian Review of International Affairs 2 (2): 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sydorenko, S. 2011. “Blocking Out its Rivals.” Transitions Online. http://www.tol.org
   Google Scholar
• Timm, C. 2010. “Neopatrimonialism by Default. State Politics and Domination in Georgia after the Rose Revolution.” Paper presented at the workshop “Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions”, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, August 23.
   Google Scholar
• Tomsa, D. 2008. Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagstyl, S., and R. Oleachyk. 2010. “Ukraine Election Divides Oligarchs.” Financial Times, January 15.
   Google Scholar
• Way, L. 2005. “Rapacious Individualism and Political Competition in Ukraine, 1992–2004.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38 (2): 191–205. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R. 2003. “Clans, Cliques and Captured States: Rethinking ‘Transition’ in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of International Development 15: 427–440. doi: 10.1002/jid.994
   Google Scholar
• Wheatly, J. 2009. “Managing Ethnic Diversity in Georgia: One Step Forward Two Steps Back.” Central Asian Survey 28 (2): 119–134. doi: 10.1080/02634930903034880
   Google Scholar
• Zherebkin, M. 2006. “Mobilizing Political Support During the Orange Revolution: The Constitutive Role of Ideological Practices.” CEU Political Science Journal 1 (1): 14–24.
   Google Scholar