Political opposition in Russia: the challenges of mobilisation and the political–civil society nexus

References

• Bovt, Georgy. 2012. “Opposition's Coordination Council is Pointless.” Moscow Times, October 25.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 6–21. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0041
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 479–487. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, Ivan. 2001. “Democracy Out of Balance.” Policy Review, (April and May): 25–35. http://www.hoover.org/research/democracy-out-balance
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Alfred B. 2010. “Russian Society and the State.” In Developments in Russian Politics 7, edited by Stephen White, Richard Sakwa, and Henry Hale, 99–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Michael, and Bob Edwards. 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 38–52. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemment, Julie. 2009. “Soviet-Style Neo-liberalism? Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and the Restructuring of Social Welfare in Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 56 (3): 36–50. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216560604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Sarah. 2011. “Civil Society in Russia: State-Society Relations in the Post-Yeltsin Era.” Problems of Post-Communism 58 (3): 11–27. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216580302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Javeline, Debra, and Sarah Lindemann-Komarova. 2010. “A Balanced Assessment of Russian Civil Society.” Journal of International Affairs 63 (2): 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kara-Murza, Vladimir. 2012. Khimki: Local Elections, National Importance. Institute of Modern Russia, September 17. Accessed March 20, 2014. http://imrussia.org/en/politics/301-fake-russia-2012-khimki
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, Petr, and Cas Mudde. 2003. “Rethinking Civil Society.” Democratization 10 (3): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13510340312331293907
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Paul. 1997. “Theories of Democratization and Patterns of Change in Eastern Europe.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 13 (1): 4–26. doi: 10.1080/13523279708415329
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nodia, Ghia. 2005. Civil Society Development in Georgia: Achievements and Challenges. Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Policy Paper. Accessed September 12, 2013. http://www.csogeorgia.org/uploads/developmentTrends/56/CivilSocietyDevelopmentinGeorgia-eng.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2011. “Opposition Accuses Kremlin in Release of Nemtsov's Phone Conversations.” December 20, 2011. Accessed January 24, 2012. http://www.rferl.org/content/russias_nemtsov_accuses_kremlin_over_phone_tapping/24427959.html
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Graeme. 2009. “Managing Society: Protest, Civil Society and Regime in Putin's Russia.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 528–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. 2006. “The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism.” In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, edited by Andreas Schedler, 1–26. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred. 1990. “On the Tasks of a Democratic Opposition.” Journal of Democracy 1 (2): 41–49. doi: 10.1353/jod.1990.0021
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred. 1997. “Democratic Opposition and Democratization Theory.” Government and Opposition 32 (4): 657–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vorobyov, R. 2012. “Battle for Khimki Takes New Turn.” Russia Beyond the Headlines, August 23. Accessed March 12, 2014. http://rbth.com/articles/2012/08/23/battle_for_khimki_takes_new_turn_17617.html
   Google Scholar
• White, David. 2005. “Going Their Own Way: The Yabloko Party's Opposition to Unification.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21 (4): 462–486. doi: 10.1080/13523270500363395
   Google Scholar
• White, David. 2011. “Dominant Party Systems: A Framework for Conceptualizing Opposition Strategies in Russia.” Democratization 18 (3): 655–681. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.563122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, David. 2013. “Taking it to the Streets: Raising the Costs of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Perspective on European Politics and Society 14 (4): 582–598. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2013.840169
   Google Scholar