624
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Russian welfare reform and social NGOs: strategies for claim-making and service provision in the case of Saint Petersburg

Pages 294-313 | Received 01 Jul 2014, Accepted 23 Feb 2015, Published online: 18 Aug 2015

References

  • Alapuro, Risto. 2010. “Diabetes Associations and Political Culture in St. Petersburg and Helsinki.” In Witnessing Change in Contemporary Russia, edited by T. Huttunen and M. Ylikangas, 107–135. Kikimora Publications. Series B. Helsinki: Aleksanteri Institute.
  • Anheier, Helmut. 2002. The Third Sector in Europe: Five Theses. Civil Society Working Paper 12. February. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29051/1/CSWP12.pdf
  • Cerami, Alfio. 2009. “Welfare State Developments in the Russian Federation: Oil-Led Social Policy and ‘the Russian Miracle’.” Social Policy and Administration 43 (2): 105–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00650.x
  • Chandler, Andrea. 2009. “Gender, Political Discourse and Social Welfare in Russia: Three Case Studies.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 51 (1): 3–24. doi: 10.1080/00085006.2009.11092600
  • Chebankova, Elena. 2013. Civil society in Putin's Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Cook, Linda. 2007. Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. London: Cornell University Press.
  • Cook, Linda. 2011. “Russia's Welfare Regime: The Shift Toward Statism.” In Gazing at Welfare, Gender and Agency in Post-socialist Countries, edited by M. Jäppinen, M. Kulmala, and A. Saarinen, 14–37. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Cook, Linda J., and Elena Vinogradova. 2006. “NGOs and Social Policy-Making in Russia's Regions.” Problems of Post-Communism 53 (5): 28–41. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216530503
  • Cox, Terry. 2012. Interest Representation and State-Society Relations in East Central Europe. Aleksanteri Paper. Kikimora Publications. http://www.helsinki.fi/aleksanteri/julkaisut/tiedostot/ap_2_2012.pdf
  • Cox, Terry. 2013. “Introduction: Transformation, Post-socialist Legacies and the Problem of Civil Society.” In Civil Society and Social Capital in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, edited by Terry Cox, 1–13. London: Routledge.
  • Deakin, Nicholas. 2001. “Putting Narrow-Mindness Out of Countenance. The UK Voluntary Sector in the New Millennium.” In Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads. An International Non-profit Analysis, edited by Helmut Anheier and Jeremy Kendall, 36–50. New York: Routledge.
  • Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 38–52. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0048
  • Gel'man, Vladimir. 2014. “The Rise and Decline of Authoritarianism in Russia.” Democratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratisation 22 (4): 503–522.
  • Hemment, Julie. 2009. “Soviet-Style Neoliberalism? Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and the Restructuring of Social Welfare in Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 56 (6): 36–50. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216560604
  • Hemment, Julie. 2012. “Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and Potemkin NGOs: Making Sense of Civil Society in Post-Soviet Russia.” Slavic Review 71 (2): 234–260. doi: 10.5612/slavicreview.71.2.0234
  • Henry, Laura. 2009. “Redefining Citizenship in Russia. Political and Social Rights.” Problems of Post-Communism 56 (6): 51–65. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216560605
  • Howard, Marc. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iakimets, V., and E. Isaeva. 2010. “Reiting subektov RF po prodvizheniyu mekhanizmov mezhsektornogo sotsial'nogo partnerstva I opisanie normativno-pravovoi bazy, regulirujuschei dejatel'nost’ grazgdanskogo obschestva v Jaroslavskoi oblasti.” In Otsenka sostoyanya i razvitia grazhdanskogo obschestva Rossii: problemi, instrumenti i regional'naia spetsifika, edited by V. Iakimets, 56–79. Moskva: KRASAND.
  • Jakobson, Lev, Irina Mersianova, and Olga Kononyhina Olga. 2011. Grazhdanskoe obshestvo v modernizirujushejsia Rossii: analiticheskii doklad Centra issledovanii grazhdanskogo obshestva i nekommercheskogo sectora NRU HSE po itogam realizacii proekta. Moscow: National Research University – Higher School of Economics. http://www.hse.ru/data/2011/10/24/1268873714/CIVICUS%20Russia%20RUS.pdf
  • Jakobson, Lev, and Sergey Sanovich. 2010. “The Changing Models of the Russian Third Sector: Import Substitution Phase.” Journal of Civil Society 6 (3): 279–300. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2010.528951
  • Kaufman, Franz-Xaver. 2013. Variations of the Welfare State: Great Britain, Sweden, France and Germany between Capitalism and Socialism. Berlin: Springer.
  • Kay, Rebecca. 2011. “Social Security and the ‘Withdrawing State’ in Rural Russia.” In Gazing at Welfare, Gender and Agency in Post-socialist Countries, edited by M. Jäppinen, M. Kulmala, and A. Saarinen, 145–169. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Korchagina, I., L. Nivorozhkina, A. Pishniak, and L. Prokofieva. 2005. “Socialnye l'goty: effektivnost’ I spravedlivost’, dostupnost’ i kachestvo.” In Dokhodi i sotsial'nie uslugi: neravenstvo uyazvimost’ bednost’, edited by L. Ovcharova. Moscow: HSE. http://www.socpol.ru/publications/inc&ben/ch2.pdf
  • Kulmala, M. 2011. “Rethinking State-Society Boundaries in a Small-Town Context of Russian Karelia.” In Gazing at Welfare, Gender and Agency in Post-Socialist Countries, edited by M. Jappinen, M. Kulmala, and A. Saarinen, 170–198. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Kulmala, Meri. 2013. “State and Society in a Small Russian Border Town.” PhD diss., University of Helsinki.
  • Kulmala, M., and A. Tarasenko. 2013. “Between Wind and Water: Strategies of the Russian Veterans’ Organisations to Adjust and Resist the ‘Modernisation’ of the Welfare System.” Paper presented at CERES conference ‘Intentions, Interactions and Paradoxes in Post-Socialist Space’, Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki University, Helsinki, May 24–25.
  • Magun, Artemy. 2011. “Higher Education in Russia: Is There a Way Out of the Neoliberal Impasse?” In Globalisation and Inequality in Emerging Societies, edited by Boike Rehbein, 148–174. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marier, Patrik. 2008. Pension Politics. Consensus and Social Conflict in Ageing Societies. London: Routledge.
  • Mersianova, Irina. 2011. Vovlechennost’ grazhdan v neformalnye praktiki grazhdanskogo obshestva I deiatel'nost’ NKO: regional'noe izmerenie. Moscow: National Research University – Higher School of Economics.
  • Mueller, Dennis. 2004. The Encyclopaedia of Public Choice. New York: Springer.
  • Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Orenstein, Mitchelle A. 2008. “Poverty, Inequality and Democracy. Postcommunist Welfare States.” Journal for Democracy 19 (4): 80–94. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0038
  • Richter, James. 2009. “Putin and the Public Chamber.” Post-Soviet Affairs 25 (1): 39–65. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.24.1.39
  • Romanov, Pavel, and Elena Iarskaia-Smirnova. 2007. Otsenka effektivnosti dejatel'nosti uchrezhdenii gosuderstvennoj podderzhki naselenia. Moskva: Tsentr sotsial'noi politiki I gendernikh issledovanii.
  • Rowley, Charles, Robert Tollison, and Gordon Tullock, eds. 1988. The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Salamon, Lester, and Wojciech Sokolowski. 2010. “Explaining Patterns of Civil Society: The ‘Social Origins’ Approach.” Prepared for delivery at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Third Sector Research, Istanbul, Turkey, July 9.
  • Sedov, Leonid. 2007. Gosudarstvenny Paternalizm I predstavlenie o politicheskoj svobode v Rossii. Levada Centre Press Release. http://www.levada.ru/13-08-2007/la-sedov-gosudarstvennyi-paternalizm-i-predstavlenie-o-politicheskoi-svobode-v-rossii
  • Starodubtsev, Andrei. 2011. Istoria odnoi reformy: EGE kak primer institucional'nogo perenosa. Saint Petersburg: SPb, Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo Universiteta. http://eu.spb.ru/images/M_center/preprint_Starodubtsev.pdf
  • Strategy. 2011. Analiticheskaia zapiska “Sovershenstvovanie institutsionalnyh uslovii funktsionirovania nekommercheskih organizatsii k predostavleniu gosudarstvennyh (munitsipalnih) uslug (rabot), razvitie mekhanizmov uchastia nekommercheskih organizatsii v upravlenii predostavleniem obshestennyh uslug.” http://2020strategy.ru/g16/documents/32655464.html
  • Sungurov, Aleksandr. 2009. “Modeli vzaimodeistvia struktur grazhdanskogo obschestva I organov vlasti: rossiiskii opyt.” In Modernizatsia ekonomiki I globalizatsia, edited by E. Jasin, 500–508. Kniga 3. Moskva: Izdatelskii dom GU-VSHE.
  • Tarasenko, Anna. 2013. “Analiz praktik vzaimodeistvia SO NKO SPb po dannym reestra poluchatelei gosudarstevooi podderzhki.” In Negosudarstvennye nekommercheskie organiztsii v Sankt Peterburge. http://www.crno.ru/assets/files/skachat/2013-11-14%20SPbNKO%20collection%20A4%20preview.pdf
  • Tarrow, Sydney, and Tsveta Petrova. 2007. “Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 74–94. doi: 10.1177/0010414006291189
  • Transparency International. 2012. Monitoring Raspredelenia Gosudarstvennyh Sredstv, Vydeljaemyh na Podderzhku Sotsial'no-Orientirovannyh Nekommercheskih Organizatsii. Moscow: Transparency International in Russia.
  • Tullock, Gordon. 1993. Rent Seeking. Cambridge: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cambridge University Press.
  • Uhlin, Anders. 2009. “Which Characteristics of Civil Society Organisations Support What Aspect of Democracy? Evidence from Post-Communist Latvia.” International Political Science Review 30 (3): 271–295. doi: 10.1177/0192512109105639
  • Wengle, Susanne, and Michael Rasell. 2008. “The Monetization of L'goty: Changing Patterns of Welfare Politics and Provision in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (5): 739–756. doi: 10.1080/09668130802085125
  • Zaostrovtsev, Andrei. 2009. Teoria obshestvennogo vybora: econpmicheskii analyz poiska renty, bjurokratii i diktatur. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Sankt-peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov.
  • Zimmer, Annette. 2001. “Corporatism Revised. The Legacy of History and the German Non-profit Sector.” In Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads. An International Non-profit Analysis, edited by Helmut Anheier and Jeremy Kendall, 114–125. New York: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.